In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: lpfc: Fix SCSI I/O completion and abort handler deadlock
During stress I/O tests with 500+ vports, hard LOCKUP call traces are
observed.
CPU A:
native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x192
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x32
lpfc_handle_fcp_err+0x4c6
lpfc_fcp_io_cmd_wqe_cmpl+0x964
lpfc_sli4_fp_handle_cqe+0x266
__lpfc_sli4_process_cq+0x105
__lpfc_sli4_hba_process_cq+0x3c
lpfc_cq_poll_hdler+0x16
irq_poll_softirq+0x76
__softirqentry_text_start+0xe4
irq_exit+0xf7
do_IRQ+0x7f
CPU B:
native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x5b
_raw_spin_lock+0x1c
lpfc_abort_handler+0x13e
scmd_eh_abort_handler+0x85
process_one_work+0x1a7
worker_thread+0x30
kthread+0x112
ret_from_fork+0x1f
Diagram of lockup:
CPUA CPUB
---- ----
lpfc_cmd->buf_lock
phba->hbalock
lpfc_cmd->buf_lock
phba->hbalock
Fix by reordering the taking of the lpfc_cmd->buf_lock and phba->hbalock in
lpfc_abort_handler routine so that it tries to take the lpfc_cmd->buf_lock
first before phba->hbalock.
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-25). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it