In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/msm/disp/dpu1: avoid clearing hw interrupts if hw_intr is null during drm uninit
If edp modeset init is failed due to panel being not ready and
probe defers during drm bind, avoid clearing irqs and dereference
hw_intr when hw_intr is null.
BUG: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000000
Call trace:
dpu_core_irq_uninstall+0x50/0xb0
dpu_irq_uninstall+0x18/0x24
msm_drm_uninit+0xd8/0x16c
msm_drm_bind+0x580/0x5fc
try_to_bring_up_master+0x168/0x1c0
__component_add+0xb4/0x178
component_add+0x1c/0x28
dp_display_probe+0x38c/0x400
platform_probe+0xb0/0xd0
really_probe+0xcc/0x2c8
__driver_probe_device+0xbc/0xe8
driver_probe_device+0x48/0xf0
__device_attach_driver+0xa0/0xc8
bus_for_each_drv+0x8c/0xd8
__device_attach+0xc4/0x150
device_initial_probe+0x1c/0x28
Changes in V2:
- Update commit message and coreect fixes tag.
Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/484430/
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-25). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it