In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/i915/gem: add missing boundary check in vm_access
A missing bounds check in vm_access() can lead to an out-of-bounds read
or write in the adjacent memory area, since the len attribute is not
validated before the memcpy later in the function, potentially hitting:
[ 183.637831] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffc90000c86000
[ 183.637934] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
[ 183.637997] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
[ 183.638059] PGD 100000067 P4D 100000067 PUD 100258067 PMD 106341067 PTE 0
[ 183.638144] Oops: 0000 [#2] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
[ 183.638201] CPU: 3 PID: 1790 Comm: poc Tainted: G D 5.17.0-rc6-ci-drm-11296+ #1
[ 183.638298] Hardware name: Intel Corporation CoffeeLake Client Platform/CoffeeLake H DDR4 RVP, BIOS CNLSFWR1.R00.X208.B00.1905301319 05/30/2019
[ 183.638430] RIP: 0010:memcpy_erms+0x6/0x10
[ 183.640213] RSP: 0018:ffffc90001763d48 EFLAGS: 00010246
[ 183.641117] RAX: ffff888109c14000 RBX: ffff888111bece40 RCX: 0000000000000ffc
[ 183.642029] RDX: 0000000000001000 RSI: ffffc90000c86000 RDI: ffff888109c14004
[ 183.642946] RBP: 0000000000000ffc R08: 800000000000016b R09: 0000000000000000
[ 183.643848] R10: ffffc90000c85000 R11: 0000000000000048 R12: 0000000000001000
[ 183.644742] R13: ffff888111bed190 R14: ffff888109c14000 R15: 0000000000001000
[ 183.645653] FS: 00007fe5ef807540(0000) GS:ffff88845b380000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 183.646570] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 183.647481] CR2: ffffc90000c86000 CR3: 000000010ff02006 CR4: 00000000003706e0
[ 183.648384] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[ 183.649271] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[ 183.650142] Call Trace:
[ 183.650988]
[ 183.651793] vm_access+0x1f0/0x2a0 [i915]
[ 183.652726] __access_remote_vm+0x224/0x380
[ 183.653561] mem_rw.isra.0+0xf9/0x190
[ 183.654402] vfs_read+0x9d/0x1b0
[ 183.655238] ksys_read+0x63/0xe0
[ 183.656065] do_syscall_64+0x38/0xc0
[ 183.656882] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[ 183.657663] RIP: 0033:0x7fe5ef725142
[ 183.659351] RSP: 002b:00007ffe1e81c7e8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000000
[ 183.660227] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000557055dfb780 RCX: 00007fe5ef725142
[ 183.661104] RDX: 0000000000001000 RSI: 00007ffe1e81d880 RDI: 0000000000000005
[ 183.661972] RBP: 00007ffe1e81e890 R08: 0000000000000030 R09: 0000000000000046
[ 183.662832] R10: 0000557055dfc2e0 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000557055dfb1c0
[ 183.663691] R13: 00007ffe1e81e980 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
Changes since v1:
- Updated if condition with range_overflows_t [Chris Wilson]
[mauld: tidy up the commit message and add Cc: stable]
(cherry picked from commit 661412e301e2ca86799aa4f400d1cf0bd38c57c6)
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (7.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 7.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-28). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it