CVE-2022-49236

HIGHNVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2025-02-27. NVD baseline CVSS 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 4 sources updated this week

Also known asEUVD-2022-54990 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-m3vm-45hm-666q (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.3%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

bpf: Fix UAF due to race between btf_try_get_module and load_module

While working on code to populate kfunc BTF ID sets for module BTF from its initcall, I noticed that by the time the initcall is invoked, the module BTF can already be seen by userspace (and the BPF verifier). The existing btf_try_get_module calls try_module_get which only fails if mod->state == MODULE_STATE_GOING, i.e. it can increment module reference when module initcall is happening in parallel.

Currently, BTF parsing happens from MODULE_STATE_COMING notifier callback. At this point, the module initcalls have not been invoked. The notifier callback parses and prepares the module BTF, allocates an ID, which publishes it to userspace, and then adds it to the btf_modules list allowing the kernel to invoke btf_try_get_module for the BTF.

However, at this point, the module has not been fully initialized (i.e. its initcalls have not finished). The code in module.c can still fail and free the module, without caring for other users. However, nothing stops btf_try_get_module from succeeding between the state transition from MODULE_STATE_COMING to MODULE_STATE_LIVE.

This leads to a use-after-free issue when BPF program loads successfully in the state transition, load_module's do_init_module call fails and frees the module, and BPF program fd on close calls module_put for the freed module. Future patch has test case to verify we don't regress in this area in future.

There are multiple points after prepare_coming_module (in load_module) where failure can occur and module loading can return error. We illustrate and test for the race using the last point where it can practically occur (in module __init function).

An illustration of the race:

CPU 0 CPU 1 load_module notifier_call(MODULE_STATE_COMING) btf_parse_module btf_alloc_id // Published to userspace list_add(&btf_mod->list, btf_modules) mod->init(...) ... ^ bpf_check | check_pseudo_btf_id | btf_try_get_module | returns true | ... ... | module __init in progress return prog_fd | ... ... V if (ret < 0) free_module(mod) ... close(prog_fd) ... bpf_prog_free_deferred module_put(used_btf.mod) // use-after-free

We fix this issue by setting a flag BTF_MODULE_F_LIVE, from the notifier callback when MODULE_STATE_LIVE state is reached for the module, so that we return NULL from btf_try_get_module for modules that are not fully formed. Since try_module_get already checks that module is not in MODULE_STATE_GOING state, and that is the only transition a live module can make before being removed from btf_modules list, this is enough to close the race and prevent the bug.

A later selftest patch crafts the race condition artifically to verify that it has been fixed, and that verifier fails to load program (with ENXIO).

Lastly, a couple of comments:

  • Even if this race didn't exist, it seems more appropriate to only
access resources (ksyms and kfuncs) of a fully formed module which has been initialized completely.
  • This patch was born out of need for synchronization against module
initcall for the next patch, so it is needed for correctness even without the aforementioned race condition. The BTF resources initialized by module initcall are set up once and then only looked up, so just waiting until the initcall has finished ensures correct behavior.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
35
EG Risk 35/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity78% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.3% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.3%
EPSS %ILE
19th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (7.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
7.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-27). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

February 26, 2025

Last Modified

March 25, 2025

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Sep 26, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

bpf: Fix UAF due to race between btf_try_get_module and load_module - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d7fccf264b1a785525b366a5b7f8113c756187ad
Web page

bpf: Fix UAF due to race between btf_try_get_module and load_module - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/51b82141fffa454abf937a8ff0b8af89e4fd0c8f
Web page

bpf: Fix UAF due to race between btf_try_get_module and load_module - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/18688de203b47e5d8d9d0953385bf30b5949324f
Web page

bpf: Fix UAF due to race between btf_try_get_module and load_module - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0481baa2318cb1ab13277715da6cdbb657807b3f

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2022-49236(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(2)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-284.11.1.el9_22023-05-09redhat
linuxKernel @ 5.15.33 (fixes >=5.12.0)—osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 5.17.3-1: fixed in 5.17.3-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 5.17.3-1: fixed in 5.17.3-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 5.17.3-1: fixed in 5.17.3-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 39× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 97 of 194 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 3 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 97 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-01 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  2. 2026-10-31 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  3. 2026-10-30 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  4. 2026-10-29 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  5. 2026-10-28 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  6. 2026-10-28 05:13 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-28 05:13 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-28 05:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m3vm-45hm-666q · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  9. 2026-10-27 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  10. 2026-10-26 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  11. 2026-10-25 17:55 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-25 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  13. 2026-10-24 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  14. 2026-10-23 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  15. 2026-10-22 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  16. 2026-10-21 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  17. 2026-10-21 05:36 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-21 05:36 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-10-21 05:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m3vm-45hm-666q · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  20. 2026-10-20 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  21. 2026-10-19 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  22. 2026-10-18 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  23. 2026-10-18 08:20 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-17 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  25. 2026-10-16 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
Show 72 more
  1. 2026-10-15 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  2. 2026-10-14 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  3. 2026-10-13 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  4. 2026-10-12 18:42 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-12 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  6. 2026-10-11 22:05 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-11 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  8. 2026-10-10 19:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  9. 2026-10-09 20:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  10. 2026-10-08 17:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  11. 2026-10-07 23:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  12. 2026-10-06 15:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  13. 2026-10-05 17:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  14. 2026-10-04 23:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  15. 2026-10-03 14:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  16. 2026-10-02 22:10 UTCOSV refresh
  17. 2026-09-30 16:12 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-09-30 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  19. 2026-09-27 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  20. 2026-09-26 15:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  21. 2026-09-26 00:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  22. 2026-09-24 14:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  23. 2026-09-23 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  24. 2026-09-20 20:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  25. 2026-09-16 14:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  26. 2026-09-16 05:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  27. 2026-09-15 03:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  28. 2026-09-13 19:39 UTCOSV refresh
  29. 2026-09-13 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  30. 2026-09-11 14:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  31. 2026-09-11 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  32. 2026-09-08 21:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  33. 2026-09-07 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  34. 2026-09-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  35. 2026-09-05 15:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  36. 2026-09-04 13:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  37. 2026-09-04 05:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  38. 2026-09-02 14:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  39. 2026-09-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  40. 2026-08-30 19:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  41. 2026-08-30 01:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  42. 2026-08-28 21:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  43. 2026-08-27 14:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  44. 2026-08-26 14:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  45. 2026-08-25 21:09 UTCOSV refresh
  46. 2026-08-25 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  47. 2026-08-23 00:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  48. 2026-08-21 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  49. 2026-08-20 22:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  50. 2026-08-19 17:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  51. 2026-08-18 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  52. 2026-08-17 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  53. 2026-08-16 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  54. 2026-08-16 02:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  55. 2026-08-15 01:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  56. 2026-08-13 21:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  57. 2026-08-12 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  58. 2026-08-09 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  59. 2026-08-09 13:39 UTCOSV refresh
  60. 2026-08-08 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  61. 2026-08-07 16:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  62. 2026-08-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  63. 2026-08-05 19:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  64. 2026-08-04 15:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  65. 2026-08-04 10:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  66. 2026-08-02 02:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  67. 2026-08-01 04:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  68. 2026-07-30 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  69. 2026-07-30 01:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  70. 2026-07-28 15:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  71. 2026-07-26 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  72. 2026-07-25 14:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2022-49236?
CVE-2022-49236 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on February 26, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Fix UAF due to race between btf_try_get_module and load_module While working on code to populate kfunc BTF ID sets for module BTF from its initcall, I noticed that by the time the initcall is invoked, the module BTF can…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2022-49236 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2022-49236 was published on February 26, 2025. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of March 25, 2025; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2022-49236 actively exploited?
CVE-2022-49236 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.3% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (19th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2022-49236?
CVE-2022-49236 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2022-49236?
A fix for CVE-2022-49236 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2022-49236 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2022-49236

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2022-49236?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.