CVE-2022-49049

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2025-04-16. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3

Also known asEUVD-2022-54498 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-5265-p799-mv2x (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.3%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

mm/secretmem: fix panic when growing a memfd_secret

When one tries to grow an existing memfd_secret with ftruncate, one gets a panic [1]. For example, doing the following reliably induces the panic:

fd = memfd_secret();

ftruncate(fd, 10); ptr = mmap(NULL, 10, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0); strcpy(ptr, "123456789");

munmap(ptr, 10); ftruncate(fd, 20);

The basic reason for this is, when we grow with ftruncate, we call down into simple_setattr, and then truncate_inode_pages_range, and eventually we try to zero part of the memory. The normal truncation code does this via the direct map (i.e., it calls page_address() and hands that to memset()).

For memfd_secret though, we specifically don't map our pages via the direct map (i.e. we call set_direct_map_invalid_noflush() on every fault). So the address returned by page_address() isn't useful, and when we try to memset() with it we panic.

This patch avoids the panic by implementing a custom setattr for memfd_secret, which detects resizes specifically (setting the size for the first time works just fine, since there are no existing pages to try to zero), and rejects them with EINVAL.

One could argue growing should be supported, but I think that will require a significantly more lengthy change. So, I propose a minimal fix for the benefit of stable kernels, and then perhaps to extend memfd_secret to support growing in a separate patch.

[1]:

BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffa0a889277028 #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page PGD afa01067 P4D afa01067 PUD 83f909067 PMD 83f8bf067 PTE 800ffffef6d88060 Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC PTI CPU: 0 PID: 281 Comm: repro Not tainted 5.17.0-dbg-DEV #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:memset_erms+0x9/0x10 Code: c1 e9 03 40 0f b6 f6 48 b8 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 48 0f af c6 f3 48 ab 89 d1 f3 aa 4c 89 c8 c3 90 49 89 f9 40 88 f0 48 89 d1 aa 4c 89 c8 c3 90 49 89 fa 40 0f b6 ce 48 b8 01 01 01 01 01 01 RSP: 0018:ffffb932c09afbf0 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffda63c4249dc0 RCX: 0000000000000fd8 RDX: 0000000000000fd8 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffffa0a889277028 RBP: ffffb932c09afc00 R08: 0000000000001000 R09: ffffa0a889277028 R10: 0000000000020023 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffda63c4249dc0 R13: ffffa0a890d70d98 R14: 0000000000000028 R15: 0000000000000fd8 FS: 00007f7294899580(0000) GS:ffffa0af9bc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: ffffa0a889277028 CR3: 0000000107ef6006 CR4: 0000000000370ef0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: ? zero_user_segments+0x82/0x190 truncate_inode_partial_folio+0xd4/0x2a0 truncate_inode_pages_range+0x380/0x830 truncate_setsize+0x63/0x80 simple_setattr+0x37/0x60 notify_change+0x3d8/0x4d0 do_sys_ftruncate+0x162/0x1d0 __x64_sys_ftruncate+0x1c/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x44/0xa0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae Modules linked in: xhci_pci xhci_hcd virtio_net net_failover failover virtio_blk virtio_balloon uhci_hcd ohci_pci ohci_hcd evdev ehci_pci ehci_hcd 9pnet_virtio 9p netfs 9pnet CR2: ffffa0a889277028

[lkp@intel.com: secretmem_iops can be static] [axelrasmussen@google.com: return EINVAL]

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
25
EG Risk 25/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity55% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 5.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.3% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.3%
EPSS %ILE
17th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-25). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

February 26, 2025

Last Modified

October 14, 2025

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2022-49049(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(2)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-284.11.1.el9_22023-05-09redhat
linuxKernel @ 5.15.35 (fixes >=5.14.0)—osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 5.17.6-1: fixed in 5.17.6-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 5.17.6-1: fixed in 5.17.6-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 5.17.6-1: fixed in 5.17.6-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 38× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 97 of 194 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 3 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 97 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-03 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  2. 2026-11-02 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  3. 2026-11-01 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  4. 2026-10-31 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  5. 2026-10-30 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  6. 2026-10-29 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  7. 2026-10-28 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  8. 2026-10-27 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  9. 2026-10-26 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  10. 2026-10-25 17:55 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-25 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  12. 2026-10-24 17:58 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-24 17:58 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-10-24 17:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5265-p799-mv2x · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  15. 2026-10-24 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  16. 2026-10-23 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  17. 2026-10-22 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  18. 2026-10-21 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  19. 2026-10-20 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  20. 2026-10-19 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  21. 2026-10-18 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  22. 2026-10-18 08:20 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-17 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  24. 2026-10-16 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  25. 2026-10-15 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
Show 72 more
  1. 2026-10-14 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  2. 2026-10-13 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  3. 2026-10-12 18:42 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-12 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  5. 2026-10-11 22:05 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  7. 2026-10-10 19:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  8. 2026-10-09 20:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  9. 2026-10-08 17:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  10. 2026-10-07 23:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  11. 2026-10-06 15:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  12. 2026-10-05 17:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  13. 2026-10-04 23:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  14. 2026-10-03 14:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  15. 2026-10-02 22:55 UTCOSV refresh
  16. 2026-09-30 16:12 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-09-30 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  18. 2026-09-27 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  19. 2026-09-26 15:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  20. 2026-09-26 00:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  21. 2026-09-24 14:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  22. 2026-09-23 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  23. 2026-09-20 20:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  24. 2026-09-16 14:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  25. 2026-09-16 05:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  26. 2026-09-15 03:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  27. 2026-09-13 20:24 UTCOSV refresh
  28. 2026-09-13 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  29. 2026-09-11 14:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  30. 2026-09-11 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  31. 2026-09-08 21:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  32. 2026-09-07 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  33. 2026-09-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  34. 2026-09-05 15:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  35. 2026-09-04 13:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  36. 2026-09-04 05:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  37. 2026-09-02 14:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  38. 2026-09-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  39. 2026-08-30 19:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  40. 2026-08-30 01:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  41. 2026-08-28 21:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  42. 2026-08-27 14:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  43. 2026-08-26 14:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  44. 2026-08-25 21:40 UTCOSV refresh
  45. 2026-08-25 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  46. 2026-08-23 00:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  47. 2026-08-21 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  48. 2026-08-20 22:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  49. 2026-08-19 17:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  50. 2026-08-18 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  51. 2026-08-17 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  52. 2026-08-16 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  53. 2026-08-16 02:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  54. 2026-08-15 01:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  55. 2026-08-13 21:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  56. 2026-08-12 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  57. 2026-08-09 14:10 UTCOSV refresh
  58. 2026-08-09 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  59. 2026-08-08 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  60. 2026-08-07 16:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  61. 2026-08-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  62. 2026-08-05 19:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  63. 2026-08-04 15:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  64. 2026-08-04 10:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  65. 2026-08-03 10:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  66. 2026-08-02 02:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  67. 2026-08-01 04:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  68. 2026-07-30 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  69. 2026-07-30 01:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  70. 2026-07-28 15:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  71. 2026-07-26 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  72. 2026-07-25 14:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2022-49049?
CVE-2022-49049 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on February 26, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/secretmem: fix panic when growing a memfd_secret When one tries to grow an existing memfd_secret with ftruncate, one gets a panic [1]. For example, doing the following reliably induces the panic: fd = memfd_secret();…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2022-49049 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2022-49049 was published on February 26, 2025. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 14, 2025; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2022-49049 actively exploited?
CVE-2022-49049 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.3% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (17th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2022-49049?
CVE-2022-49049 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2022-49049?
A fix for CVE-2022-49049 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2022-49049 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2022-49049

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2022-49049?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.