CVE-2022-49006

HIGHNVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2024-10-21. NVD baseline CVSS 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
7.8
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 0%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

tracing: Free buffers when a used dynamic event is removed

After 65536 dynamic events have been added and removed, the "type" field of the event then uses the first type number that is available (not currently used by other events). A type number is the identifier of the binary blobs in the tracing ring buffer (known as events) to map them to logic that can parse the binary blob.

The issue is that if a dynamic event (like a kprobe event) is traced and is in the ring buffer, and then that event is removed (because it is dynamic, which means it can be created and destroyed), if another dynamic event is created that has the same number that new event's logic on parsing the binary blob will be used.

To show how this can be an issue, the following can crash the kernel:

# cd /sys/kernel/tracing # for i in seq 65536; do echo 'p:kprobes/foo do_sys_openat2 $arg1:u32' > kprobe_events # done

For every iteration of the above, the writing to the kprobe_events will remove the old event and create a new one (with the same format) and increase the type number to the next available on until the type number reaches over 65535 which is the max number for the 16 bit type. After it reaches that number, the logic to allocate a new number simply looks for the next available number. When an dynamic event is removed, that number is then available to be reused by the next dynamic event created. That is, once the above reaches the max number, the number assigned to the event in that loop will remain the same.

Now that means deleting one dynamic event and created another will reuse the previous events type number. This is where bad things can happen. After the above loop finishes, the kprobes/foo event which reads the do_sys_openat2 function call's first parameter as an integer.

# echo 1 > kprobes/foo/enable # cat /etc/passwd > /dev/null # cat trace cat-2211 [005] .... 2007.849603: foo: (do_sys_openat2+0x0/0x130) arg1=4294967196 cat-2211 [005] .... 2007.849620: foo: (do_sys_openat2+0x0/0x130) arg1=4294967196 cat-2211 [005] .... 2007.849838: foo: (do_sys_openat2+0x0/0x130) arg1=4294967196 cat-2211 [005] .... 2007.849880: foo: (do_sys_openat2+0x0/0x130) arg1=4294967196 # echo 0 > kprobes/foo/enable

Now if we delete the kprobe and create a new one that reads a string:

# echo 'p:kprobes/foo do_sys_openat2 +0($arg2):string' > kprobe_events

And now we can the trace:

# cat trace sendmail-1942 [002] ..... 530.136320: foo: (do_sys_openat2+0x0/0x240) arg1= cat-2046 [004] ..... 530.930817: foo: (do_sys_openat2+0x0/0x240) arg1="������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������" cat-2046 [004] ..... 530.930961: foo: (do_sys_openat2+0x0/0x240) arg1="������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������" cat-2046 [004] ..... 530.934278: foo: (do_sys_openat2+0x0/0x240) arg1="������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������" cat-2046 [004] ..... 530.934563: foo: (do_sys_openat2+0x0/0x240) arg1="��������������������������������������� ---truncated---

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8(medium)
EG Risk
35(Track)
EG Risk 35/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity78% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS
17.1%
KEV
Not listed

Published

October 21, 2024

Last Modified

November 4, 2024

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2022-49006(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(2)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-570.12.1.el9_62025-05-13redhat
linuxKernel @ 5.4.226osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 13× in last 7d / 47× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 103 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-07-23 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-23 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-23 02:16 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-07-22 23:03 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-20 17:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-16 17:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-15 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-15 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-13 22:38 UTCOSV refresh
  20. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-12 05:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-11 08:25 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-11 08:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-09 19:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-08 15:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-07 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-06 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-06 02:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-05 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-04 06:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-01 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-06-30 23:20 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-06-29 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-28 04:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-28 04:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-25 20:16 UTCOSV refresh
  19. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-22 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-15 17:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-14 23:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-12 23:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-12 23:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-11 13:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-11 13:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-08 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-08 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-08 09:28 UTCOSV refresh
  50. 2026-06-07 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-07 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-01 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-01 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-05-31 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-05-31 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-05-29 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-05-28 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-05-28 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-05-27 13:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-05-27 13:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-05-26 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-05-26 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-05-26 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-05-26 07:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-05-26 07:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-05-26 07:17 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2022-49006?
CVE-2022-49006 is a high vulnerability published on October 21, 2024. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tracing: Free buffers when a used dynamic event is removed After 65536 dynamic events have been added and removed, the "type" field of the event then uses the first type number that is available (not currently used by other…
When was CVE-2022-49006 disclosed?
CVE-2022-49006 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on October 21, 2024, with the most recent update on November 4, 2024. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2022-49006 actively exploited?
CVE-2022-49006 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 17.1% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2022-49006?
CVE-2022-49006 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2022-49006?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2022-49006, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2022-49006

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2022-49006?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.