CVE-2022-49006

HIGHNVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2024-10-21. NVD baseline CVSS 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 4 sources updated this week

Also known asEUVD-2022-53890 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-xjr6-8999-vr65 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.3%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

tracing: Free buffers when a used dynamic event is removed

After 65536 dynamic events have been added and removed, the "type" field of the event then uses the first type number that is available (not currently used by other events). A type number is the identifier of the binary blobs in the tracing ring buffer (known as events) to map them to logic that can parse the binary blob.

The issue is that if a dynamic event (like a kprobe event) is traced and is in the ring buffer, and then that event is removed (because it is dynamic, which means it can be created and destroyed), if another dynamic event is created that has the same number that new event's logic on parsing the binary blob will be used.

To show how this can be an issue, the following can crash the kernel:

# cd /sys/kernel/tracing # for i in seq 65536; do echo 'p:kprobes/foo do_sys_openat2 $arg1:u32' > kprobe_events # done

For every iteration of the above, the writing to the kprobe_events will remove the old event and create a new one (with the same format) and increase the type number to the next available on until the type number reaches over 65535 which is the max number for the 16 bit type. After it reaches that number, the logic to allocate a new number simply looks for the next available number. When an dynamic event is removed, that number is then available to be reused by the next dynamic event created. That is, once the above reaches the max number, the number assigned to the event in that loop will remain the same.

Now that means deleting one dynamic event and created another will reuse the previous events type number. This is where bad things can happen. After the above loop finishes, the kprobes/foo event which reads the do_sys_openat2 function call's first parameter as an integer.

# echo 1 > kprobes/foo/enable # cat /etc/passwd > /dev/null # cat trace cat-2211 [005] .... 2007.849603: foo: (do_sys_openat2+0x0/0x130) arg1=4294967196 cat-2211 [005] .... 2007.849620: foo: (do_sys_openat2+0x0/0x130) arg1=4294967196 cat-2211 [005] .... 2007.849838: foo: (do_sys_openat2+0x0/0x130) arg1=4294967196 cat-2211 [005] .... 2007.849880: foo: (do_sys_openat2+0x0/0x130) arg1=4294967196 # echo 0 > kprobes/foo/enable

Now if we delete the kprobe and create a new one that reads a string:

# echo 'p:kprobes/foo do_sys_openat2 +0($arg2):string' > kprobe_events

And now we can the trace:

# cat trace sendmail-1942 [002] ..... 530.136320: foo: (do_sys_openat2+0x0/0x240) arg1= cat-2046 [004] ..... 530.930817: foo: (do_sys_openat2+0x0/0x240) arg1="������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������" cat-2046 [004] ..... 530.930961: foo: (do_sys_openat2+0x0/0x240) arg1="������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������" cat-2046 [004] ..... 530.934278: foo: (do_sys_openat2+0x0/0x240) arg1="������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������" cat-2046 [004] ..... 530.934563: foo: (do_sys_openat2+0x0/0x240) arg1="��������������������������������������� ---truncated---

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
35
EG Risk 35/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity78% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.3% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.3%
EPSS %ILE
17th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (7.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
7.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-28). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

October 21, 2024

Last Modified

November 4, 2024

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Oct 21, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

tracing: Free buffers when a used dynamic event is removed - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c52d0c8c4f38f7580cff61c4dfe1034c580cedfd
Web page

tracing: Free buffers when a used dynamic event is removed - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/be111ebd8868d4b7c041cb3c6102e1ae27d6dc1d
Web page

tracing: Free buffers when a used dynamic event is removed - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4313e5a613049dfc1819a6dfb5f94cf2caff9452
Web page

tracing: Free buffers when a used dynamic event is removed - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/417d5ea6e735e5d88ffb6c436cf2938f3f476dd1
Web page

tracing: Free buffers when a used dynamic event is removed - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1603feac154ff38514e8354e3079a455eb4801e2

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2022-49006(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(2)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-570.12.1.el9_62025-05-13redhat
linuxKernel @ 5.4.226 (fixes >=2.6.33)—osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 5.10.92-2 (22 versions)
  • every version up to 5.10.158-1: fixed in 5.10.158-1
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 6.0.12-1: fixed in 6.0.12-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 6.0.12-1: fixed in 6.0.12-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 6.0.12-1: fixed in 6.0.12-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 41× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 98 of 204 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 2 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 106 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-01 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  2. 2026-10-31 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  3. 2026-10-30 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  4. 2026-10-29 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  5. 2026-10-28 21:31 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-28 21:31 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-10-28 21:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xjr6-8999-vr65 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  8. 2026-10-28 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  9. 2026-10-27 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  10. 2026-10-26 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  11. 2026-10-25 17:55 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-25 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  13. 2026-10-24 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  14. 2026-10-23 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  15. 2026-10-22 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  16. 2026-10-21 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  17. 2026-10-21 05:36 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-21 05:36 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-10-21 05:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xjr6-8999-vr65 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  20. 2026-10-20 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  21. 2026-10-19 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  22. 2026-10-18 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  23. 2026-10-18 08:20 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-17 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  25. 2026-10-16 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
Show 73 more
  1. 2026-10-15 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  2. 2026-10-14 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  3. 2026-10-13 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  4. 2026-10-12 18:42 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-12 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  6. 2026-10-11 22:05 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-11 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  8. 2026-10-10 19:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  9. 2026-10-10 11:03 UTCOSV refresh
  10. 2026-10-09 20:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  11. 2026-10-08 17:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  12. 2026-10-07 23:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  13. 2026-10-06 15:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  14. 2026-10-05 17:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  15. 2026-10-04 23:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  16. 2026-10-03 14:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  17. 2026-09-30 16:11 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-09-30 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  19. 2026-09-27 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  20. 2026-09-26 15:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  21. 2026-09-26 00:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  22. 2026-09-24 14:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  23. 2026-09-23 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  24. 2026-09-20 20:56 UTCOSV refresh
  25. 2026-09-20 20:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  26. 2026-09-16 14:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  27. 2026-09-16 05:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  28. 2026-09-15 03:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  29. 2026-09-13 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  30. 2026-09-11 14:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  31. 2026-09-11 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  32. 2026-09-08 21:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  33. 2026-09-07 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  34. 2026-09-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  35. 2026-09-05 15:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  36. 2026-09-04 13:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  37. 2026-09-04 05:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  38. 2026-09-02 14:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  39. 2026-09-01 20:27 UTCOSV refresh
  40. 2026-09-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  41. 2026-08-30 19:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  42. 2026-08-30 01:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  43. 2026-08-28 21:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  44. 2026-08-27 14:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  45. 2026-08-26 14:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  46. 2026-08-25 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  47. 2026-08-23 00:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  48. 2026-08-21 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  49. 2026-08-20 22:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  50. 2026-08-19 17:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  51. 2026-08-18 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  52. 2026-08-17 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  53. 2026-08-16 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  54. 2026-08-16 02:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  55. 2026-08-15 22:07 UTCOSV refresh
  56. 2026-08-15 01:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  57. 2026-08-13 21:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  58. 2026-08-12 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  59. 2026-08-09 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  60. 2026-08-08 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  61. 2026-08-07 16:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  62. 2026-08-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  63. 2026-08-05 19:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  64. 2026-08-04 15:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  65. 2026-08-04 10:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  66. 2026-08-03 10:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  67. 2026-08-02 02:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  68. 2026-08-01 04:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  69. 2026-07-31 15:42 UTCOSV refresh
  70. 2026-07-30 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  71. 2026-07-30 01:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  72. 2026-07-28 15:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  73. 2026-07-26 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2022-49006?
CVE-2022-49006 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on October 21, 2024. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tracing: Free buffers when a used dynamic event is removed After 65536 dynamic events have been added and removed, the "type" field of the event then uses the first type number that is available (not currently used by other…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2022-49006 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2022-49006 was published on October 21, 2024. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 4, 2024; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2022-49006 actively exploited?
CVE-2022-49006 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.3% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (17th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2022-49006?
CVE-2022-49006 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2022-49006?
A fix for CVE-2022-49006 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2022-49006 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2022-49006

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2022-49006?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.