CVE-2022-48644

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2024-04-28. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3

Also known asEUVD-2022-51339 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-vr5f-5953-gfj5 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net/sched: taprio: avoid disabling offload when it was never enabled

In an incredibly strange API design decision, qdisc->destroy() gets called even if qdisc->init() never succeeded, not exclusively since commit 87b60cfacf9f ("net_sched: fix error recovery at qdisc creation"), but apparently also earlier (in the case of qdisc_create_dflt()).

The taprio qdisc does not fully acknowledge this when it attempts full offload, because it starts off with q->flags = TAPRIO_FLAGS_INVALID in taprio_init(), then it replaces q->flags with TCA_TAPRIO_ATTR_FLAGS parsed from netlink (in taprio_change(), tail called from taprio_init()).

But in taprio_destroy(), we call taprio_disable_offload(), and this determines what to do based on FULL_OFFLOAD_IS_ENABLED(q->flags).

But looking at the implementation of FULL_OFFLOAD_IS_ENABLED() (a bitwise check of bit 1 in q->flags), it is invalid to call this macro on q->flags when it contains TAPRIO_FLAGS_INVALID, because that is set to U32_MAX, and therefore FULL_OFFLOAD_IS_ENABLED() will return true on an invalid set of flags.

As a result, it is possible to crash the kernel if user space forces an error between setting q->flags = TAPRIO_FLAGS_INVALID, and the calling of taprio_enable_offload(). This is because drivers do not expect the offload to be disabled when it was never enabled.

The error that we force here is to attach taprio as a non-root qdisc, but instead as child of an mqprio root qdisc:

$ tc qdisc add dev swp0 root handle 1: \ mqprio num_tc 8 map 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 \ queues 1@0 1@1 1@2 1@3 1@4 1@5 1@6 1@7 hw 0 $ tc qdisc replace dev swp0 parent 1:1 \ taprio num_tc 8 map 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 \ queues 1@0 1@1 1@2 1@3 1@4 1@5 1@6 1@7 base-time 0 \ sched-entry S 0x7f 990000 sched-entry S 0x80 100000 \ flags 0x0 clockid CLOCK_TAI Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address fffffffffffffff8 [fffffffffffffff8] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000 Internal error: Oops: 96000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP Call trace: taprio_dump+0x27c/0x310 vsc9959_port_setup_tc+0x1f4/0x460 felix_port_setup_tc+0x24/0x3c dsa_slave_setup_tc+0x54/0x27c taprio_disable_offload.isra.0+0x58/0xe0 taprio_destroy+0x80/0x104 qdisc_create+0x240/0x470 tc_modify_qdisc+0x1fc/0x6b0 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x12c/0x390 netlink_rcv_skb+0x5c/0x130 rtnetlink_rcv+0x1c/0x2c

Fix this by keeping track of the operations we made, and undo the offload only if we actually did it.

I've added "bool offloaded" inside a 4 byte hole between "int clockid" and "atomic64_t picos_per_byte". Now the first cache line looks like below:

$ pahole -C taprio_sched net/sched/sch_taprio.o struct taprio_sched { struct Qdisc * * qdiscs; /* 0 8 */ struct Qdisc * root; /* 8 8 */ u32 flags; /* 16 4 */ enum tk_offsets tk_offset; /* 20 4 */ int clockid; /* 24 4 */ bool offloaded; /* 28 1 */

/* XXX 3 bytes hole, try to pack */

atomic64_t picos_per_byte; /* 32 0 */

/* XXX 8 bytes hole, try to pack */

spinlock_t current_entry_lock; /* 40 0 */

/* XXX 8 bytes hole, try to pack */

struct sched_entry * current_entry; /* 48 8 */ struct sched_gate_list * oper_sched; /* 56 8 */ /* --- cacheline 1 boundary (64 bytes) --- */

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
25
EG Risk 25/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity55% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 5.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
14th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-25). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

April 28, 2024

Last Modified

September 19, 2025

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
linuxKernel @ 5.4.215 (fixes >=5.4.0)—osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 5.10.92-2 (19 versions)
  • every version up to 5.10.148-1: fixed in 5.10.148-1
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 6.0.2-1: fixed in 6.0.2-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 6.0.2-1: fixed in 6.0.2-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 6.0.2-1: fixed in 6.0.2-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 37× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 96 of 198 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 4 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 102 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-02 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  2. 2026-11-01 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  3. 2026-10-31 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  4. 2026-10-30 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  5. 2026-10-29 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  6. 2026-10-28 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  7. 2026-10-27 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  8. 2026-10-26 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  9. 2026-10-25 17:55 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-25 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  11. 2026-10-24 18:08 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-24 18:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vr5f-5953-gfj5 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  13. 2026-10-24 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  14. 2026-10-23 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  15. 2026-10-22 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  16. 2026-10-21 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  17. 2026-10-20 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  18. 2026-10-19 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  19. 2026-10-18 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  20. 2026-10-18 08:21 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-17 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  22. 2026-10-16 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  23. 2026-10-15 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  24. 2026-10-14 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  25. 2026-10-13 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
Show 71 more
  1. 2026-10-12 18:42 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-12 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  3. 2026-10-11 22:06 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-11 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  5. 2026-10-11 08:25 UTCOSV refresh
  6. 2026-10-10 19:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  7. 2026-10-09 20:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  8. 2026-10-08 17:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  9. 2026-10-07 23:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  10. 2026-10-06 15:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  11. 2026-10-05 17:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  12. 2026-10-04 23:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  13. 2026-10-03 14:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  14. 2026-09-30 16:11 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-09-30 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  16. 2026-09-26 15:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  17. 2026-09-26 00:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  18. 2026-09-24 14:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  19. 2026-09-23 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  20. 2026-09-21 21:31 UTCOSV refresh
  21. 2026-09-20 20:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  22. 2026-09-16 14:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  23. 2026-09-16 05:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  24. 2026-09-15 03:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  25. 2026-09-13 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  26. 2026-09-11 14:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  27. 2026-09-11 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  28. 2026-09-08 21:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  29. 2026-09-07 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  30. 2026-09-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  31. 2026-09-05 15:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  32. 2026-09-04 13:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  33. 2026-09-04 05:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  34. 2026-09-02 17:08 UTCOSV refresh
  35. 2026-09-02 14:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  36. 2026-09-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  37. 2026-08-30 19:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  38. 2026-08-30 01:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  39. 2026-08-28 21:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  40. 2026-08-27 14:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  41. 2026-08-26 14:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  42. 2026-08-25 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  43. 2026-08-21 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  44. 2026-08-20 22:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  45. 2026-08-19 17:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  46. 2026-08-18 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  47. 2026-08-17 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  48. 2026-08-16 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  49. 2026-08-16 11:08 UTCOSV refresh
  50. 2026-08-16 02:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  51. 2026-08-15 01:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  52. 2026-08-13 21:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  53. 2026-08-12 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  54. 2026-08-09 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  55. 2026-08-08 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  56. 2026-08-07 16:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  57. 2026-08-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  58. 2026-08-05 19:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  59. 2026-08-04 15:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  60. 2026-08-04 10:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  61. 2026-08-03 10:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  62. 2026-08-02 02:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  63. 2026-08-01 05:36 UTCOSV refresh
  64. 2026-08-01 04:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  65. 2026-07-30 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  66. 2026-07-30 01:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  67. 2026-07-28 15:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  68. 2026-07-26 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  69. 2026-07-25 14:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  70. 2026-07-24 14:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  71. 2026-07-23 14:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2022-48644?
CVE-2022-48644 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on April 28, 2024. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/sched: taprio: avoid disabling offload when it was never enabled In an incredibly strange API design decision, qdisc->destroy() gets called even if qdisc->init() never succeeded, not exclusively since commit 87b60cfacf9f…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2022-48644 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2022-48644 was published on April 28, 2024. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 19, 2025; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2022-48644 actively exploited?
CVE-2022-48644 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (14th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2022-48644?
CVE-2022-48644 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2022-48644?
A fix for CVE-2022-48644 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2022-48644

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2022-48644?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.