CVE-2022-45786

HIGHNVD 8.18.1
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This high-severity CVE scores 8.1 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.9%, top 43% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, nvd
8.1
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 1%CVSS: 8.1Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

There are issues with the AGE drivers for Golang and Python that enable SQL injections to occur. This impacts AGE for PostgreSQL 11 & AGE for PostgreSQL 12, all versions up-to-and-including 1.1.0, when using those drivers.

The fix is to update to the latest Golang and Python drivers in addition to the latest version of AGE that is used for PostgreSQL 11 or  PostgreSQL 12.

The update of AGE will add a new function to enable parameterization of the cypher() function, which, in conjunction with the driver updates, will resolve this issue.

Background (for those who want more information):

After thoroughly researching this issue, we found that due to the nature of the cypher() function, it was not easy to parameterize the values passed into it. This enabled SQL injections, if the developer of the driver wasn't careful. The developer of the Golang and Pyton drivers didn't fully utilize parameterization, likely because of this, thus enabling SQL injections.

The obvious fix to this issue is to use parameterization in the drivers for all PG SQL queries. However, parameterizing all PG queries is complicated by the fact that the cypher() function call itself cannot be parameterized directly, as it isn't a real function. At least, not the parameters that would take the graph name and cypher query.

The reason the cypher() function cannot have those values parameterized is because the function is a placeholder and never actually runs. The cypher() function node, created by PG in the query tree, is transformed and replaced with a query tree for the actual cypher query during the analyze phase. The problem is that parameters - that would be passed in and that the cypher() function transform needs to be resolved - are only resolved in the execution phase, which is much later. Since the transform of the cypher() function needs to know the graph name and cypher query prior to execution, they can't be passed as parameters.

The fix that we are testing right now, and are proposing to use, is to create a function that will be called prior to the execution of the cypher() function transform. This new function will allow values to be passed as parameters for the graph name and cypher query. As this command will be executed prior to the cypher() function transform, its values will be resolved. These values can then be cached for the immediately following cypher() function transform to use. As added features, the cached values will store the calling session's pid, for validation. And, the cypher() function transform will clear this cached information after function invocation, regardless of whether it was used.

This method will allow the parameterizing of the cypher() function indirectly and provide a way to lock out SQL injection attacks.

CVSS v3
8.1
EG Score
8.1(medium)
EG Risk
37(Track)
EG Risk 37/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity81% × 45%
Exploitation1% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS
57.5%
KEV
Not listed

Published

February 4, 2023

Last Modified

March 26, 2025

Affected Packages

(2 across 2 ecosystems)
Go(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
github.com/apache/age/drivers/golang
PyPI(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
apache-age-python0.0.1, 0.0.2, 0.0.3, 0.0.40.0.5

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 12× in last 7d / 41× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-23 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-23 02:15 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-07-22 23:02 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-20 17:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-19 14:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-15 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-12 05:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-11 08:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-11 08:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-09 19:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-08 15:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-07 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-06 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-06 02:21 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 71 more
  1. 2026-07-05 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-04 06:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-02 16:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-01 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-06-30 23:20 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-06-30 23:20 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-06-29 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-06-29 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-06-28 04:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-06-28 04:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-22 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-15 17:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-14 23:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-12 23:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-12 23:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-11 13:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-11 13:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-10 22:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-08 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-07 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-07 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-02 20:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-01 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-01 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-05-31 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-05-31 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-05-29 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-05-28 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-05-28 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-05-27 13:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-05-27 13:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-05-26 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-05-26 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-05-26 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-05-26 07:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-05-26 07:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-05-26 07:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-05-25 07:23 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2022-45786?
CVE-2022-45786 is a high vulnerability published on February 4, 2023. There are issues with the AGE drivers for Golang and Python that enable SQL injections to occur. This impacts AGE for PostgreSQL 11 & AGE for PostgreSQL 12, all versions up-to-and-including 1.1.0, when using those drivers. The fix is to update to the latest Golang and Python drivers in addition to…
When was CVE-2022-45786 disclosed?
CVE-2022-45786 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on February 4, 2023, with the most recent update on March 26, 2025. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2022-45786 actively exploited?
CVE-2022-45786 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 57.5% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2022-45786?
CVE-2022-45786 has a CVSS v3 base score of 8.1 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2022-45786?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2022-45786, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2022-45786

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2022-45786?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.