The pgAdmin server includes an HTTP API that is intended to be used to validate the path a user selects to external PostgreSQL utilities such as pg_dump and pg_restore. The utility is executed by the server to determine what PostgreSQL version it is from. Versions of pgAdmin prior to 6.17 failed to properly secure this API, which could allow an unauthenticated user to call it with a path of their choosing, such as a UNC path to a server they control on a Windows machine. This would cause an appropriately named executable in the target path to be executed by the pgAdmin server.
CVE-2022-4223
“▲” beside the score: it is higher than NVD's CVSS score.
Score elevated to 9.0 because EPSS predicted 80% probability of exploitation within the next 30 days (99th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs) when EchelonGraph scored this CVE. NVD baseline CVSS 8.8 retained for reference. Confidence: see factors.
Also known asEUVD-2022-7489 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-3v6v-2x6p-32mc (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- High exploitation likelihood — EPSS 80%
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 8.8
- EG Score
- 9.0CRITICALhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 72EG Risk 72/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity88% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation80% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 80%
- EPSS %ILE
- 99th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (9.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.0 is EPSS's lift toward 9.0 from its impact severity (EG Severity, CVSS 8.8 HIGH): a likelihood of exploitation, not impact.
- EG Severity
- 8.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 80% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
December 13, 2022
Last Modified
April 14, 2025
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Aug 31, 2026[SECURITY] Fedora 37 Update: pgadmin4-6.17-2.fc37 - package-announce - Fedora mailing-lists
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/R5EYTPKHVFSDCETBJI7LBZE4EYHBPN2Q/Unauthenticated remote code execution while validating the binary path · Issue #5593 · pgadmin-org/pgadmin4 · GitHub
https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4/issues/5593Patch Availability(1)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| pip | pgadmin4 @ 6.17 (fixes < 6.17) | — | ghsa |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
PyPI(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| pgadmin4 | 4.20 ... 6.9 (33 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 13× in last 7d / 40× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 91 of 119 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 9 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 28 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-11-01 21:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-01 21:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3v6v-2x6p-32mc · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-11-01 08:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3v6v-2x6p-32mc · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-11-01 08:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 20:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-30 19:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-30 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-29 18:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-28 17:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-28 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-27 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-27 15:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 17:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-25 12:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 11:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-23 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-23 10:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 09:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-21 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-21 08:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-20 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-20 07:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 06:32 UTCEG score recompute
Show 66 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-18 05:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 04:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-16 03:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 00:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-13 19:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-13 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-12 18:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 22:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-30 16:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-26 15:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-24 14:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-24 03:43 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-23 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-15 03:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-11 14:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-05 15:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-04 21:24 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-04 05:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-30 19:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-27 14:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-25 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-21 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-20 22:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-19 17:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-18 08:34 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-16 02:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-13 21:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-12 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-07 16:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-05 19:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-04 15:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-03 03:27 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-07-30 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-26 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-25 14:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-24 14:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-23 02:14 UTCEG score recompute▲ 0.20
- 2026-07-22 23:01 UTCEG score recompute▼ 0.20
- 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-20 17:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-16 12:49 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-12 05:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-08 15:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-04 06:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-01 15:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-28 11:49 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-06-28 04:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
Public detection templates
(1 reference)A public Nuclei detection template is referenced for this CVE. A detection template checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code.
- Nucleihttp/cves/2022/CVE-2022-4223.yamlPublished Jan 23, 2026
pgAdmin < 6.17 - Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution
Open source ↗
Related CVEs(same product + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownPyPI:pgadmin4
- CVE-2026-7813EG 9.9CRITICAL
- CVE-2025-2945EG 9.9EPSS p99CRITICAL
- CVE-2024-9014EG 9.9EPSS p96CRITICAL
- CVE-2024-2044EG 9.9EPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2025-12762EG 9.8EPSS p96CRITICAL
- CVE-2025-13780NVD 8.8EG 9.1CRITICAL
- CVE-2025-2946EG 9.1CRITICAL
- CVE-2026-7816EG 8.8HIGH
- CVE-2026-7815EG 8.8HIGH
- CVE-2025-12763EG 8.8HIGH
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-94 · CWE-862
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2022-4223?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2022-4223 published?
Is CVE-2022-4223 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2022-4223?
How do I remediate CVE-2022-4223?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2022-4223
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2022-4223?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.