A OS command injection vulnerability in the CGI program of Zyxel USG FLEX 100(W) firmware versions 5.00 through 5.21 Patch 1, USG FLEX 200 firmware versions 5.00 through 5.21 Patch 1, USG FLEX 500 firmware versions 5.00 through 5.21 Patch 1, USG FLEX 700 firmware versions 5.00 through 5.21 Patch 1, USG FLEX 50(W) firmware versions 5.10 through 5.21 Patch 1, USG20(W)-VPN firmware versions 5.10 through 5.21 Patch 1, ATP series firmware versions 5.10 through 5.21 Patch 1, VPN series firmware versions 4.60 through 5.21 Patch 1, which could allow an attacker to modify specific files and then execute some OS commands on a vulnerable device.
CVE-2022-30525
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
Score elevated to 9.8 because this CVE is listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2022-05-16), indicating real-world exploitation has been confirmed by US federal agencies. NVD baseline CVSS 9.8 retained for reference. Confidence: HIGH.
Also known asEUVD-2022-52385 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- Actively exploited in the wild (CISA-KEV) — the reason this is sooner than the SSVC decision on this page at low mission impact
No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.
The CVE record's description, written by its CNA (Zyxel Corporation), states the affected versions: "A OS command injection vulnerability in the CGI program of Zyxel USG FLEX 100(W) firmware versions 5.00 through 5.21 Patch 1, USG FLEX 200 firmware versions 5.00 through 5.21 Patch 1, USG FLEX 500 firmware versions 5.00…" No release containing a fix is confirmed on record.
- CVSS v3
- 9.8
- EG Score
- 9.8CRITICALhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 99EG Risk 99/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity98% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation100% × 40%Fixed at 100% for a CISA KEV listing: EchelonGraph's rule.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Attend at low mission impact; Act at medium or high.Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Check the vendor's advisory for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation sooner than your normal schedule at low mission impact and as soon as possible at medium or high. - EPSS PROB
- 99.9%
- EPSS %ILE
- 99th
- KEV
- ⚠ Exploited
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 99.9% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- CISA KEV and EG-KEV Tier 1 (exploited in the wild)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Act at medium mission impactAttend at low mission impact; Act at medium or high.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 3 days & forensic triage if it is not.No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: this CVE is in CISA's KEV catalog, and CISA's required action for it, quoted below, applies whether or not a fix is released.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Attend at low mission impact; Act at medium or high.
No fix is confirmed yet. Check the vendor's advisory for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation sooner than your normal schedule at low mission impact and as soon as possible at medium or high.
Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 3 days & forensic triage if it is not.
No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: this CVE is in CISA's KEV catalog, and CISA's required action for it, quoted below, applies whether or not a fix is released.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV yes (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
CISA required action“Apply updates per vendor instructions.”
Quoted verbatim from CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. CISA directs it at US federal civilian executive branch agencies under Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 26-04, which replaced BOD 22-01 on 10 June 2026; it is not EchelonGraph's advice. CISA's notes: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-30525
Published
May 12, 2022
Last Modified
October 27, 2025
Advisory Details (5)
Auto-updated Oct 30, 2026Support Download Page Redirect
https://www.zyxel.com/support/Zyxel-security-advisory-for-OS-command-injection-vulnerability-of-firewalls.shtmlPacket Storm
http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/168202/Zyxel-Firewall-SUID-Binary-Privilege-Escalation.htmlPacket Storm
http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/167372/Zyxel-USG-FLEX-5.21-Command-Injection.htmlWeakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 12× in last 7d / 96× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 930 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 830 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-11-02 02:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-02 02:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-11-01 01:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-01 01:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-31 00:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 00:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-29 23:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-29 23:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-28 23:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-28 23:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-27 22:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-27 22:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-26 21:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-26 21:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-25 21:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-25 18:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 99.9% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-24 20:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 20:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-23 19:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-23 19:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-22 19:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 19:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-21 18:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-21 18:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-21 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 99.9% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-20 17:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-20 17:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-19 17:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 17:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-18 16:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-18 09:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-18 08:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 08:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 08:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-16 07:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 07:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-15 07:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 07:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-14 06:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 06:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-13 05:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-12 18:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 05:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-12 01:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-11 21:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 21:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-11 17:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 17:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-11 13:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-11 09:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-11 05:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-11 01:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-10 21:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-10 17:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-10 13:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-10 09:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-10 05:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-10 01:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-09 21:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-09 17:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-09 13:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-09 09:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-09 05:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-09 01:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-08 21:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-08 17:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-08 13:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-08 09:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-08 05:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-08 01:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-07 21:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-07 17:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-07 13:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-07 09:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-07 05:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-07 01:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-06 21:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-06 17:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-06 13:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-06 09:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-06 05:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-06 01:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-05 21:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-05 17:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-05 13:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-05 09:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-05 05:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-05 01:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-04 21:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-04 17:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-04 13:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-04 09:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-04 05:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-04 01:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-03 21:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-03 17:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-03 13:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-03 09:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-987m-9prq-3p7m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
Publicly available exploits
(12 references, 10 shown)Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 Metasploit module, 1 Exploit-DB entry, 8 GitHub PoCs), as are 1 Nuclei detection template, 1 GitHub checker repository. A detection template checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code. A GitHub repository named or described as a checker or scanner checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code. No fix is confirmed yet, so defenders should restrict or isolate affected systems accordingly until one is published.
- Metasploitexploit/linux/http/zyxel_ztp_rce✓ verifiedPublished May 13, 2022
Zyxel Firewall ZTP Unauthenticated Command Injection
Open source ↗ - Open source ↗GitHub checkercbk914/CVE-2022-30525_checkPublished Jan 15, 2023
- Exploit-DBEDB-50946Published Jun 3, 2022
Zyxel USG FLEX 5.21 - OS Command Injection
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCwest9b/CVE-2022-30525Published May 28, 2022
CVE-2022-30525 Zyxel 防火墙命令注入漏洞 POC&EXPC
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCiveresk/cve-2022-30525Published May 23, 2022
Initial POC for the CVE-2022-30525
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCChocapikk/CVE-2022-30525-Reverse-ShellPublished May 18, 2022
Simple python script to exploit CVE-2022-30525 (FIXED): Zyxel Firewall Unauthenticated Remote Command Injection
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCk0sf/CVE-2022-30525Published May 16, 2022
CVE-2022-30525(Zxyel 防火墙命令注入)的概念证明漏洞利用
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCHenry4E36/CVE-2022-30525Published May 13, 2022
Zyxel 防火墙远程命令注入漏洞(CVE-2022-30525)
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCsavior-only/CVE-2022-30525Published May 13, 2022
Zyxel 防火墙未经身份验证的远程命令注入
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCshuai06/CVE-2022-30525Published May 13, 2022
Zyxel 防火墙远程命令注入漏洞(CVE-2022-30525)批量检测脚本
Open source ↗
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-78
- CVE-2022-29539EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2022-29303EG 9.8 KEVEPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2022-28915EG 9.8EPSS p94CRITICAL
- CVE-2022-28913EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2022-28912EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2022-28911EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2022-28910EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2022-28909EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2022-28908EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2022-28907EG 9.8CRITICAL
Frequently asked(6)
What is CVE-2022-30525?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2022-30525 published?
Is CVE-2022-30525 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2022-30525?
Which products are affected by CVE-2022-30525?
How do I remediate CVE-2022-30525?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2022-30525
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2022-30525?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.