Vulnerability in the Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition product of Oracle Java SE (component: Libraries). Supported versions that are affected are Oracle Java SE: 17.0.2 and 18; Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition: 21.3.1 and 22.0.0.2. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition accessible data. Note: This vulnerability applies to Java deployments, typically in clients running sandboxed Java Web Start applications or sandboxed Java applets, that load and run untrusted code (e.g., code that comes from the internet) and rely on the Java sandbox for security. This vulnerability can also be exploited by using APIs in the specified Component, e.g., through a web service which supplies data to the APIs. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.5 (Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N).
CVE-2022-21449
“▲” beside the score: it is higher than NVD's CVSS score.
Score elevated to 8.8 because EPSS predicted 77% probability of exploitation within the next 30 days (99th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs) when EchelonGraph scored this CVE. NVD baseline CVSS 7.5 retained for reference. Confidence: see factors.
Also known asEUVD-2022-26673 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-cj8x-r9fp-q656 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- High exploitation likelihood — EPSS 77%
- Public exploit or proof-of-concept code is available
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 7.5
- EG Score
- 8.8HIGHhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 80EG Risk 80/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity75% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation77% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 77%
- EPSS %ILE
- 99th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (8.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.8 is EPSS's lift toward 9.0 from its impact severity (EG Severity, CVSS 7.5 HIGH): a likelihood of exploitation, not impact.
- EG Severity
- 7.5 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 77% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-27). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
April 19, 2022
Last Modified
November 21, 2024
Advisory Details (10)
Auto-updated Oct 18, 2026oss-security - Re: CVE-2022-21449 and version reporting
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/04/30/3oss-security - Re: CVE-2022-21449 and version reporting
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/04/30/2oss-security - Re: CVE-2022-21449 and version reporting
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/04/30/1oss-security - Re: CVE-2022-21449 and version reporting
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/04/29/1oss-security - Re: CVE-2022-21449 and version reporting
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/04/28/7oss-security - Re: CVE-2022-21449 and version reporting
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/04/28/6oss-security - Re: CVE-2022-21449 and version reporting
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/04/28/5oss-security - Re: CVE-2022-21449 and version reporting
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/04/28/4oss-security - Re: CVE-2022-21449 and version reporting
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/04/28/3oss-security - CVE-2022-21449 and version reporting
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/04/28/2Vendor Advisories for CVE-2022-21449(3)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2022:1729Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: java-17-openjdk security update
- RHSA-2022:1436Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: OpenJDK 17.0.3 security update for Portable Linux Builds
- RHSA-2022:1445Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: java-17-openjdk security and bug fix update
Patch Availability(6)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ubuntu | openjdk-17-jre (17.0.3+7-0ubuntu0.22.04.1) @ jammy | 2026-10-28 | ubuntu |
| ubuntu | openjdk-11-jre (11.0.16+8-0ubuntu1~20.04) @ focal | 2026-10-28 | ubuntu |
| redhat | java-17-openjdk-1:17.0.3.0.7-1.el9_0 | 2022-05-17 | redhat |
| redhat | Linux | 2022-04-28 | redhat |
| redhat | patch | 2022-04-28 | redhat |
| redhat | java-17-openjdk-1:17.0.3.0.6-2.el8_5 | 2022-04-20 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(2 across 2 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openjdk-17 | 17+35-1 ... 17~35ea-1 (13 versions) |
| — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openjdk-17 | — |
| — |
Additional Vendor Advisories
(3)
Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 6× in last 7d / 26× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 92 of 156 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 8 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 64 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-31 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 77% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-29 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 77% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-28 12:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-28 12:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-28 12:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cj8x-r9fp-q656 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-27 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 77% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-26 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 77% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-25 18:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 77% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-22 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 77% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-21 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 77% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-21 08:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-21 08:07 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-21 08:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cj8x-r9fp-q656 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-20 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 77% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-18 08:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 77% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-16 20:24 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-10-15 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 77% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-14 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 77% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-13 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 77% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-12 19:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 23:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-10 19:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 77% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-08 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 77% · 99th percentile
Show 67 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-07 23:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 77% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 77% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-30 15:48 UTCEG score recompute▲ 0.80
- 2026-09-30 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 77% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-29 15:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-25 00:18 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-24 14:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-23 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-17 19:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-15 03:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-13 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-12 14:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-11 14:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-07 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-05 15:55 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-05 15:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-04 13:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-04 05:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-30 19:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-30 01:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-27 14:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-24 14:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-21 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-20 22:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-19 17:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-19 02:59 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-17 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-16 02:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-15 01:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-13 21:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-12 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-07 16:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-05 19:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-04 10:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-03 22:27 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-02 02:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 48% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-01 04:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 48% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-30 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 48% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-30 01:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 48% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-28 15:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 48% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-26 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 48% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-25 14:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 48% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-24 14:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 48% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-23 02:08 UTCEG score recompute▲ 0.50
- 2026-07-22 22:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 48% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-21 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 48% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-20 17:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 48% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 48% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-18 10:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 48% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-17 14:59 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-07-16 17:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 48% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 48% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-13 22:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 48% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 48% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-12 05:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 48% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-11 08:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 48% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-09 19:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 48% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-08 15:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 48% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-07 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 48% · 98th percentile
Publicly available exploits
(4 references)Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (3 GitHub PoCs), as is 1 GitHub checker repository. A GitHub repository named or described as a checker or scanner checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code. Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.
- GitHub checkerthack1/CVE-2022-21449Published Apr 24, 2022
Zeek script to detect exploitation attempts of CVE-2022-21449 targeting TLS clients
Open source ↗ - Open source ↗GitHub PoCjfrog/jfrog-CVE-2022-21449Published Apr 20, 2022
- GitHub PoCjmiettinen/CVE-2022-21449-vuln-testPublished Apr 20, 2022
CVE-2022-21449 Vulnerability tester
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCnotkmhn/CVE-2022-21449-TLS-PoCPublished Apr 20, 2022
CVE-2022-21449 Proof of Concept demonstrating its usage with a client running on a vulnerable Java version and a malicious TLS server
Open source ↗
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor)
Same product
10 shownDebian:11:openjdk-17
Same vendor
9 shownredhat:RHSA-2022:1436 · ubuntu:USN-5546-1
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2022-21449?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2022-21449 published?
Is CVE-2022-21449 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2022-21449?
How do I remediate CVE-2022-21449?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2022-21449
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2022-21449?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.