CVE-2021-47378

CRITICALNVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2024-05-21. NVD baseline CVSS 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 4 sources updated this week

Also known asEUVD-2021-34383 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-7fq3-h5p4-7j98 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 1.2%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

nvme-rdma: destroy cm id before destroy qp to avoid use after free

We should always destroy cm_id before destroy qp to avoid to get cma event after qp was destroyed, which may lead to use after free. In RDMA connection establishment error flow, don't destroy qp in cm event handler.Just report cm_error to upper level, qp will be destroy in nvme_rdma_alloc_queue() after destroy cm id.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
60
EG Risk 60/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation1.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
1.2%
EPSS %ILE
67th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
1.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

May 21, 2024

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Oct 31, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

nvme-rdma: destroy cm id before destroy qp to avoid use after free - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9817d763dbe15327b9b3ff4404fa6f27f927e744
Web page

nvme-rdma: destroy cm id before destroy qp to avoid use after free - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d268a182c56e8361e19fb781137411643312b994
Web page

nvme-rdma: destroy cm id before destroy qp to avoid use after free - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ecf0dc5a904830c926a64feffd8e01141f89822f

Patch Availability(13)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux5.10.46-4, 5.10.46-5, 5.10.70-1~bpo10+1
  • every version up to 5.10.70-1: fixed in 5.10.70-1
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 5.14.9-1: fixed in 5.14.9-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 5.14.9-1: fixed in 5.14.9-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 5.14.9-1: fixed in 5.14.9-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(10)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 27× in last 7d / 93× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 99 of 267 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 1 repeat row among the latest 100 is merged into the row it repeats. The 168 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-02 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  2. 2026-11-02 10:26 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-11-02 10:26 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-11-02 10:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7fq3-h5p4-7j98 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  5. 2026-11-01 10:25 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-11-01 10:25 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-11-01 10:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7fq3-h5p4-7j98 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  8. 2026-10-31 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  9. 2026-10-31 10:24 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-31 10:24 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-31 10:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7fq3-h5p4-7j98 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  12. 2026-10-30 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  13. 2026-10-30 10:23 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-30 10:23 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-30 10:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7fq3-h5p4-7j98 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  16. 2026-10-29 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  17. 2026-10-29 10:21 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-29 10:21 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-10-29 10:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7fq3-h5p4-7j98 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  20. 2026-10-28 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  21. 2026-10-28 10:20 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-28 10:20 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-28 10:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7fq3-h5p4-7j98 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  24. 2026-10-27 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  25. 2026-10-27 09:22 UTCEG score recompute
Show 74 more
  1. 2026-10-27 09:22 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-10-27 09:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7fq3-h5p4-7j98 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  3. 2026-10-26 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  4. 2026-10-26 09:01 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-10-26 09:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7fq3-h5p4-7j98 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  6. 2026-10-25 18:18 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-25 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  8. 2026-10-25 09:00 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-25 09:00 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-10-25 09:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7fq3-h5p4-7j98 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  11. 2026-10-24 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  12. 2026-10-24 08:59 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-24 08:59 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-10-24 08:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7fq3-h5p4-7j98 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  15. 2026-10-23 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  16. 2026-10-23 08:57 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-23 08:57 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-23 08:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7fq3-h5p4-7j98 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  19. 2026-10-22 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  20. 2026-10-22 08:55 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-22 08:55 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-22 08:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7fq3-h5p4-7j98 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  23. 2026-10-21 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  24. 2026-10-21 08:52 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-21 08:52 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-10-21 08:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7fq3-h5p4-7j98 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  27. 2026-10-20 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  28. 2026-10-20 08:51 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-10-20 08:51 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-10-20 08:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7fq3-h5p4-7j98 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  31. 2026-10-19 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  32. 2026-10-19 08:48 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-10-19 08:48 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-10-19 08:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7fq3-h5p4-7j98 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  35. 2026-10-18 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  36. 2026-10-18 08:47 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-10-18 08:47 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-10-18 08:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7fq3-h5p4-7j98 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  39. 2026-10-17 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  40. 2026-10-17 08:43 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-10-17 08:43 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-10-17 08:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7fq3-h5p4-7j98 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  43. 2026-10-16 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  44. 2026-10-16 08:40 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-10-16 08:40 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-10-16 08:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7fq3-h5p4-7j98 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  47. 2026-10-15 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
  48. 2026-10-15 07:49 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-10-15 07:49 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-10-15 07:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7fq3-h5p4-7j98 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  51. 2026-10-14 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
  52. 2026-10-14 03:48 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-10-14 03:48 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-10-14 03:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7fq3-h5p4-7j98 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  55. 2026-10-13 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
  56. 2026-10-12 23:43 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-10-12 23:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7fq3-h5p4-7j98 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  58. 2026-10-12 19:05 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-10-12 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
  60. 2026-10-11 23:31 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-10-11 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
  62. 2026-10-10 19:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
  63. 2026-10-09 20:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
  64. 2026-10-08 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
  65. 2026-10-07 23:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
  66. 2026-10-06 15:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
  67. 2026-10-05 17:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
  68. 2026-10-04 23:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
  69. 2026-10-03 14:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
  70. 2026-10-02 16:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
  71. 2026-09-30 15:45 UTCEG score recompute
  72. 2026-09-30 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
  73. 2026-09-29 15:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
  74. 2026-09-28 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2021-47378?
CVE-2021-47378 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on May 21, 2024. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nvme-rdma: destroy cm id before destroy qp to avoid use after free We should always destroy cm_id before destroy qp to avoid to get cma event after qp was destroyed, which may lead to use after free. In RDMA connection…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2021-47378 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2021-47378 was published on May 21, 2024. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of August 5, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2021-47378 actively exploited?
CVE-2021-47378 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (67th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2021-47378?
CVE-2021-47378 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2021-47378?
A fix for CVE-2021-47378 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2021-47378 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2021-47378

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2021-47378?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.