CVE-2021-47303

HIGHNVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2024-05-21. NVD baseline CVSS 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

bpf: Track subprog poke descriptors correctly and fix use-after-free

Subprograms are calling map_poke_track(), but on program release there is no hook to call map_poke_untrack(). However, on program release, the aux memory (and poke descriptor table) is freed even though we still have a reference to it in the element list of the map aux data. When we run map_poke_run(), we then end up accessing free'd memory, triggering KASAN in prog_array_map_poke_run():

[...] [ 402.824689] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in prog_array_map_poke_run+0xc2/0x34e [ 402.824698] Read of size 4 at addr ffff8881905a7940 by task hubble-fgs/4337 [ 402.824705] CPU: 1 PID: 4337 Comm: hubble-fgs Tainted: G I 5.12.0+ #399 [ 402.824715] Call Trace: [ 402.824719] dump_stack+0x93/0xc2 [ 402.824727] print_address_description.constprop.0+0x1a/0x140 [ 402.824736] ? prog_array_map_poke_run+0xc2/0x34e [ 402.824740] ? prog_array_map_poke_run+0xc2/0x34e [ 402.824744] kasan_report.cold+0x7c/0xd8 [ 402.824752] ? prog_array_map_poke_run+0xc2/0x34e [ 402.824757] prog_array_map_poke_run+0xc2/0x34e [ 402.824765] bpf_fd_array_map_update_elem+0x124/0x1a0 [...]

The elements concerned are walked as follows:

for (i = 0; i < elem->aux->size_poke_tab; i++) { poke = &elem->aux->poke_tab[i]; [...]

The access to size_poke_tab is a 4 byte read, verified by checking offsets in the KASAN dump:

[ 402.825004] The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff8881905a7800 which belongs to the cache kmalloc-1k of size 1024 [ 402.825008] The buggy address is located 320 bytes inside of 1024-byte region [ffff8881905a7800, ffff8881905a7c00)

The pahole output of bpf_prog_aux:

struct bpf_prog_aux { [...] /* --- cacheline 5 boundary (320 bytes) --- */ u32 size_poke_tab; /* 320 4 */ [...]

In general, subprograms do not necessarily manage their own data structures. For example, BTF func_info and linfo are just pointers to the main program structure. This allows reference counting and cleanup to be done on the latter which simplifies their management a bit. The aux->poke_tab struct, however, did not follow this logic. The initial proposed fix for this use-after-free bug further embedded poke data tracking into the subprogram with proper reference counting. However, Daniel and Alexei questioned why we were treating these objects special; I agree, its unnecessary. The fix here removes the per subprogram poke table allocation and map tracking and instead simply points the aux->poke_tab pointer at the main programs poke table. This way, map tracking is simplified to the main program and we do not need to manage them per subprogram.

This also means, bpf_prog_free_deferred(), which unwinds the program reference counting and kfrees objects, needs to ensure that we don't try to double free the poke_tab when free'ing the subprog structures. This is easily solved by NULL'ing the poke_tab pointer. The second detail is to ensure that per subprogram JIT logic only does fixups on poke_tab[] entries it owns. To do this, we add a pointer in the poke structure to point at the subprogram value so JITs can easily check while walking the poke_tab structure if the current entry belongs to the current program. The aux pointer is stable and therefore suitable for such comparison. On the jit_subprogs() error path, we omit cleaning up the poke->aux field because these are only ever referenced from the JIT side, but on error we will never make it to the JIT, so its fine to leave them dangling. Removing these pointers would complicate the error path for no reason. However, we do need to untrack all poke descriptors from the main program as otherwise they could race with the freeing of JIT memory from the subprograms. Lastly, a748c6975dea3 ("bpf: propagate poke des ---truncated---

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8(medium)
EG Risk
35(Track)
EG Risk 35/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity78% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
15%
KEV
Not listed

Published

May 21, 2024

Last Modified

December 26, 2024

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 45× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 106 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-07-26 14:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-25 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-24 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-24 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-23 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-23 02:06 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-07-22 22:53 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-21 15:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-21 15:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-20 17:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-19 14:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-18 10:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-16 17:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-16 17:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-15 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-15 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-14 09:40 UTCOSV refresh
  21. 2026-07-13 22:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-12 05:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-11 08:25 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-09 19:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-09 19:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-08 15:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-08 15:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-07 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-06 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-06 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-06 02:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-06 02:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-05 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-05 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-04 06:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-04 06:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-01 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-30 23:20 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-29 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-29 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-28 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-28 04:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-28 04:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-27 03:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-26 10:37 UTCOSV refresh
  24. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-22 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-15 17:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-14 23:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-14 23:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-13 22:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-13 22:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-12 23:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-11 13:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-10 22:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-10 13:20 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-08 17:11 UTCOSV refresh
  51. 2026-06-08 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-08 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-08 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-07 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-07 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-05 22:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-05 22:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-04 13:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-06-02 20:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-06-02 20:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-06-01 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-06-01 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-05-31 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-05-29 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-05-28 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-05-28 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-05-27 13:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-05-27 13:39 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2021-47303?
CVE-2021-47303 is a high vulnerability published on May 21, 2024. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Track subprog poke descriptors correctly and fix use-after-free Subprograms are calling mappoketrack(), but on program release there is no hook to call mappokeuntrack(). However, on program release, the aux memory (and poke…
When was CVE-2021-47303 disclosed?
CVE-2021-47303 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on May 21, 2024, with the most recent update on December 26, 2024. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2021-47303 actively exploited?
CVE-2021-47303 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 85.5% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2021-47303?
CVE-2021-47303 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2021-47303?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2021-47303, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2021-47303

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2021-47303?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.