CVE-2021-47011

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2024-02-28. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3

Also known asEUVD-2021-33659 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-jvv7-jhh3-m96v (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.3%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

mm: memcontrol: slab: fix obtain a reference to a freeing memcg

Patch series "Use obj_cgroup APIs to charge kmem pages", v5.

Since Roman's series "The new cgroup slab memory controller" applied. All slab objects are charged with the new APIs of obj_cgroup. The new APIs introduce a struct obj_cgroup to charge slab objects. It prevents long-living objects from pinning the original memory cgroup in the memory. But there are still some corner objects (e.g. allocations larger than order-1 page on SLUB) which are not charged with the new APIs. Those objects (include the pages which are allocated from buddy allocator directly) are charged as kmem pages which still hold a reference to the memory cgroup.

E.g. We know that the kernel stack is charged as kmem pages because the size of the kernel stack can be greater than 2 pages (e.g. 16KB on x86_64 or arm64). If we create a thread (suppose the thread stack is charged to memory cgroup A) and then move it from memory cgroup A to memory cgroup B. Because the kernel stack of the thread hold a reference to the memory cgroup A. The thread can pin the memory cgroup A in the memory even if we remove the cgroup A. If we want to see this scenario by using the following script. We can see that the system has added 500 dying cgroups (This is not a real world issue, just a script to show that the large kmallocs are charged as kmem pages which can pin the memory cgroup in the memory).

#!/bin/bash

cat /proc/cgroups | grep memory

cd /sys/fs/cgroup/memory echo 1 > memory.move_charge_at_immigrate

for i in range{1..500} do mkdir kmem_test echo $$ > kmem_test/cgroup.procs sleep 3600 & echo $$ > cgroup.procs echo cat kmem_test/cgroup.procs > cgroup.procs rmdir kmem_test done

cat /proc/cgroups | grep memory

This patchset aims to make those kmem pages to drop the reference to memory cgroup by using the APIs of obj_cgroup. Finally, we can see that the number of the dying cgroups will not increase if we run the above test script.

This patch (of 7):

The rcu_read_lock/unlock only can guarantee that the memcg will not be freed, but it cannot guarantee the success of css_get (which is in the refill_stock when cached memcg changed) to memcg.

rcu_read_lock() memcg = obj_cgroup_memcg(old) __memcg_kmem_uncharge(memcg) refill_stock(memcg) if (stock->cached != memcg) // css_get can change the ref counter from 0 back to 1. css_get(&memcg->css) rcu_read_unlock()

This fix is very like the commit:

eefbfa7fd678 ("mm: memcg/slab: fix use after free in obj_cgroup_charge")

Fix this by holding a reference to the memcg which is passed to the __memcg_kmem_uncharge() before calling __memcg_kmem_uncharge().

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
25
EG Risk 25/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity55% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 5.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.3%
EPSS %ILE
16th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-25). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

February 28, 2024

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2021-47011(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatkernel-0:4.18.0-348.el82021-11-09redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 5.10.38-1: fixed in 5.10.38-1
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 5.10.38-1: fixed in 5.10.38-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 5.10.38-1: fixed in 5.10.38-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 5.10.38-1: fixed in 5.10.38-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 6× in last 7d / 35× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 97 of 214 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 3 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 117 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-01 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  2. 2026-10-30 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  3. 2026-10-29 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  4. 2026-10-28 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  5. 2026-10-27 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  6. 2026-10-26 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  7. 2026-10-25 18:18 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-25 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  9. 2026-10-24 21:51 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-24 21:51 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-24 21:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jvv7-jhh3-m96v · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  12. 2026-10-24 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  13. 2026-10-23 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  14. 2026-10-21 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  15. 2026-10-20 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  16. 2026-10-19 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  17. 2026-10-19 13:25 UTCOSV refresh
  18. 2026-10-18 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  19. 2026-10-18 08:50 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-17 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  21. 2026-10-16 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  22. 2026-10-15 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  23. 2026-10-14 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  24. 2026-10-13 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  25. 2026-10-12 19:05 UTCEG score recompute
Show 72 more
  1. 2026-10-12 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  2. 2026-10-11 23:31 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-11 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  4. 2026-10-10 19:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  5. 2026-10-09 20:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  6. 2026-10-08 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  7. 2026-10-07 23:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  8. 2026-10-06 15:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  9. 2026-10-05 17:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 14th percentile
  10. 2026-10-04 23:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 14th percentile
  11. 2026-10-03 14:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 14th percentile
  12. 2026-10-02 16:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 14th percentile
  13. 2026-09-30 15:45 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-09-30 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 14th percentile
  15. 2026-09-29 15:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 14th percentile
  16. 2026-09-28 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 14th percentile
  17. 2026-09-26 20:33 UTCOSV refresh
  18. 2026-09-26 15:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  19. 2026-09-26 00:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  20. 2026-09-24 14:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  21. 2026-09-23 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
  22. 2026-09-22 14:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
  23. 2026-09-21 20:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
  24. 2026-09-20 20:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
  25. 2026-09-19 15:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
  26. 2026-09-18 19:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
  27. 2026-09-17 19:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
  28. 2026-09-16 14:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
  29. 2026-09-15 03:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
  30. 2026-09-12 14:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
  31. 2026-09-11 14:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
  32. 2026-09-11 09:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
  33. 2026-09-08 21:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
  34. 2026-09-07 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
  35. 2026-09-07 05:48 UTCOSV refresh
  36. 2026-09-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
  37. 2026-09-05 15:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
  38. 2026-09-04 13:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
  39. 2026-09-04 05:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
  40. 2026-09-02 14:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
  41. 2026-09-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
  42. 2026-08-30 19:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
  43. 2026-08-30 01:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
  44. 2026-08-28 21:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
  45. 2026-08-27 14:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
  46. 2026-08-26 14:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
  47. 2026-08-25 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  48. 2026-08-24 14:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  49. 2026-08-21 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
  50. 2026-08-20 22:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
  51. 2026-08-20 15:31 UTCOSV refresh
  52. 2026-08-19 17:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
  53. 2026-08-18 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
  54. 2026-08-17 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
  55. 2026-08-16 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
  56. 2026-08-16 02:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
  57. 2026-08-15 01:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
  58. 2026-08-13 21:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
  59. 2026-08-12 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
  60. 2026-08-11 13:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
  61. 2026-08-09 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
  62. 2026-08-08 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
  63. 2026-08-07 16:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
  64. 2026-08-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
  65. 2026-08-05 19:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
  66. 2026-08-05 09:44 UTCEG score recompute
  67. 2026-08-05 09:44 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-08-05 09:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jvv7-jhh3-m96v · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  69. 2026-08-04 15:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
  70. 2026-08-04 12:21 UTCEG score recompute
  71. 2026-08-04 12:21 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-08-04 12:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jvv7-jhh3-m96v · GitHub CVSS 5.5

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2021-47011?
CVE-2021-47011 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on February 28, 2024. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm: memcontrol: slab: fix obtain a reference to a freeing memcg Patch series "Use obj_cgroup APIs to charge kmem pages", v5. Since Roman's series "The new cgroup slab memory controller" applied. All slab objects are charged with…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2021-47011 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2021-47011 was published on February 28, 2024. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of August 5, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2021-47011 actively exploited?
CVE-2021-47011 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.3% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (16th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2021-47011?
CVE-2021-47011 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2021-47011?
A fix for CVE-2021-47011 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2021-47011 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2021-47011

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2021-47011?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.