CVE-2021-44228

CRITICALNVD 10.010.0
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score elevated to 10.0 because this CVE is listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2021-12-10), indicating real-world exploitation has been confirmed by US federal agencies. NVD baseline CVSS 10.0 retained for reference. Confidence: HIGH.

Triggered by: CISA KEV (actively exploited)
Sources: CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 3 sources updated this weekExploited in the wild

Also known asEUVD-2021-34768 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-jfh8-c2jp-5v3q (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

10.0EG
EchelonGraph verdictPatch nowTreat as an emergency — this is being exploited.
  • Actively exploited in the wild (CISA-KEV) — the reason this is sooner than the SSVC decision on this page at low mission impact
CISA-KEV: ExploitedEPSS PROB: >99.9%CVSS: 10.0Exploit: Metasploit · other public PoCExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Apache Log4j2 2.0-beta9 through 2.15.0 (excluding security releases 2.12.2, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1) JNDI features used in configuration, log messages, and parameters do not protect against attacker controlled LDAP and other JNDI related endpoints. An attacker who can control log messages or log message parameters can execute arbitrary code loaded from LDAP servers when message lookup substitution is enabled. From log4j 2.15.0, this behavior has been disabled by default. From version 2.16.0 (along with 2.12.2, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1), this functionality has been completely removed. Note that this vulnerability is specific to log4j-core and does not affect log4net, log4cxx, or other Apache Logging Services projects.

CVSS v3
10.0
EG Score
10.0CRITICALhigh confidence
EG Risk
100
EG Risk 100/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity100% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 10.0 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation100% × 40%
Fixed at 100% for a CISA KEV listing: EchelonGraph's rule.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Attend at low mission impact; Act at medium or high.
Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it sooner than your standard update timelines at low mission impact and as soon as possible at medium or high.
EPSS PROB
>99.9%
EPSS %ILE
100th
KEV
⚠ Exploited

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (10.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 10.0 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
10.0 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
>99.9% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
CISA KEV and EG-KEV Tier 1 (exploited in the wild)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Act at medium mission impactAttend at low mission impact; Act at medium or high.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 3 days & forensic triage if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Attend at low mission impact; Act at medium or high.

A fix is available. Apply it sooner than your standard update timelines at low mission impact and as soon as possible at medium or high.

Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 3 days & forensic triage if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV yes (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

CISA required action“For all affected software assets for which updates exist, the only acceptable remediation actions are: 1) Apply updates; OR 2) remove affected assets from agency networks. Temporary mitigations using one of the measures provided at https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/ed-22-02-apache-log4j-recommended-mitigation-measures are only acceptable until updates are available.”

Quoted verbatim from CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. CISA directs it at US federal civilian executive branch agencies under Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 26-04, which replaced BOD 22-01 on 10 June 2026; it is not EchelonGraph's advice. CISA's notes: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-44228

Published

December 10, 2021

Last Modified

August 11, 2026

Patch Availability(30)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntuliblog4j2-java-doc (2.4-2ubuntu0.1~esm1) @ xenial2026-11-01ubuntu
ubuntuliblog4j2-java (2.15.0-0.21.04.1) @ hirsute2026-11-01ubuntu
ubuntuliblog4j2-java (2.16.0-0.21.10.1) @ impish2026-11-01ubuntu
redhateap7-wildfly-0:7.3.12-3.GA_redhat_00002.1.el7eap2025-02-24redhat
redhateap7-wildfly-0:7.1.9-2.GA_redhat_00002.1.ep7.el72025-02-24redhat
redhatlog4j-core2022-01-26redhat
redhatpatch2022-01-11redhat
redhatopenshift4/ose-metering-presto:v4.6.0-202112150545.p0.g190688a.assembly.art35952021-12-16redhat
redhatopenshift4/ose-metering-hive:v4.6.0-202112140546.p0.g8b9da97.assembly.stream2021-12-16redhat
redhatopenshift4/ose-metering-presto:v4.7.0-202112150631.p0.gd502108.assembly.4.7.402021-12-16redhat
redhatorg.apache.logging.log4j/log4j-api:2.17.1.redhat-000022021-12-15redhat
redhatopenshift4/ose-metering-presto:v4.8.0-202112150431.p0.g4b934ae.assembly.art35992021-12-15redhat
redhatopenshift3/ose-logging-elasticsearch5:v3.11.570-2.gd1198202021-12-14redhat
redhatpatch2021-12-14redhat
redhatopenshift4/ose-metering-hive:v4.8.0-202112132154.p0.g57dd03a.assembly.stream2021-12-14redhat
redhatpatch2021-12-14redhat
redhatopenshift-logging/elasticsearch6-rhel8:v6.8.1-672021-12-14redhat
redhatopenshift-logging/elasticsearch6-rhel8:v6.8.1-652021-12-14redhat
redhatopenshift-logging/elasticsearch6-rhel8:v6.8.1-662021-12-14redhat
redhatopenshift-logging/elasticsearch6-rhel8:v5.0.10-12021-12-14redhat
mavencom.guicedee.services:log4j-core—ghsa
mavenorg.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-core @ 2.3.1 (fixes >= 2.0-beta9, < 2.3.1)—ghsa
mavenorg.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-core @ 2.12.2 (fixes >= 2.4, < 2.12.2)—ghsa
mavenorg.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-core @ 2.15.0 (fixes >= 2.13.0, < 2.15.0)—ghsa
mavenorg.ops4j.pax.logging:pax-logging-log4j2 @ 1.9.2 (fixes >= 1.8.0, < 1.9.2)—ghsa
mavenorg.ops4j.pax.logging:pax-logging-log4j2 @ 1.11.10 (fixes >= 1.11.0, < 1.11.10)—ghsa
mavenorg.ops4j.pax.logging:pax-logging-log4j2 @ 2.0.11 (fixes >= 2.0.0, < 2.0.11)—ghsa
mavenorg.ops4j.pax.logging:pax-logging-log4j2 @ 1.10.8 (fixes >= 1.10.0, < 1.10.8)—ghsa
mavenorg.xbib.elasticsearch:log4j—ghsa
mavenuk.co.nichesolutions.logging.log4j:log4j-core—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(11 across 7 ecosystems)
Maven(5)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
com.guicedee.services:log4j-core1.0.10.0 ... 1.2.1.2-jre17 (362 versions)
  • every version through 1.2.1.2-jre17: no fix on record
—
org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-core2.10.0 ... 2.9.1 (18 versions)
  • 2.13.0 up to 2.15.0: fixed in 2.15.0
  • 2.0-beta9 up to 2.3.1: fixed in 2.3.1
  • 2.4 up to 2.12.2: fixed in 2.12.2
—
org.ops4j.pax.logging:pax-logging-log4j22.0.0 ... 2.0.9 (11 versions)
  • 1.8.0 up to 1.9.2: fixed in 1.9.2
  • 1.10.0 up to 1.10.8: fixed in 1.10.8
  • 1.11.0 up to 1.11.10: fixed in 1.11.10
  • 2.0.0 up to 2.0.11: fixed in 2.0.11
—
org.xbib.elasticsearch:log4j6.3.2.1——
uk.co.nichesolutions.logging.log4j:log4j-core2.6.3-CUSTOM——
Debian:10(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
apache-log4j22.11.1-2, 2.11.2-1, 2.13.3-1
  • every version up to 2.15.0-1~deb10u1: fixed in 2.15.0-1~deb10u1
—
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
apache-log4j22.13.3-1, 2.15.0-1~deb10u1
  • every version up to 2.15.0-1~deb11u1: fixed in 2.15.0-1~deb11u1
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
apache-log4j2—
  • every version up to 2.15.0-1: fixed in 2.15.0-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
apache-log4j2—
  • every version up to 2.15.0-1: fixed in 2.15.0-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
apache-log4j2—
  • every version up to 2.15.0-1: fixed in 2.15.0-1
—
Debian:9(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
apache-log4j22.7-2
  • every version up to 2.7-2+deb9u1: fixed in 2.7-2+deb9u1
—

Weakness Classification(4)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(6)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 16× in last 7d / 97× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 876 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 776 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-02 03:57 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-11-02 03:57 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-02 03:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jfh8-c2jp-5v3q · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  4. 2026-11-01 08:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jfh8-c2jp-5v3q · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  5. 2026-11-01 08:30 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-11-01 03:09 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-11-01 03:09 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-31 02:20 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-31 02:20 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-10-30 01:32 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-30 01:32 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-10-29 00:44 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-29 00:44 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-10-27 23:53 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-27 23:53 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-26 23:02 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-25 22:11 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-25 18:20 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-24 21:21 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-24 21:21 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-23 20:33 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-23 20:33 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-22 19:44 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-22 19:44 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-10-21 18:56 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-21 18:56 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-10-20 18:08 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-20 18:08 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-10-19 17:16 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-19 17:16 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-18 16:27 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-10-18 12:30 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-18 08:51 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-17 11:41 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-17 11:41 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-16 10:51 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-16 10:51 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-15 10:01 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-15 10:01 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-14 09:10 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-14 09:10 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-10-13 08:20 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-12 19:07 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-12 07:32 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-12 03:22 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-11 23:13 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-11 23:13 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-11 19:03 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-11 19:03 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-10-11 14:53 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-10-11 14:53 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-10-11 10:44 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-10-11 06:32 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-10-11 02:22 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-10-10 22:12 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-10-10 18:02 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-10-10 13:53 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-10-10 09:42 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-10-10 05:32 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-10-10 01:20 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-10-09 21:11 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-10-09 17:00 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-10-09 12:49 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-10-09 08:41 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-10-09 04:29 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-10-09 00:20 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-10-08 20:12 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-10-08 16:03 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-10-08 11:53 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-10-08 07:44 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-10-08 03:35 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-10-07 23:26 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-10-07 19:17 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-10-07 15:08 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-10-07 10:59 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-10-07 06:50 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-10-07 02:41 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-10-06 22:32 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-10-06 18:23 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-10-06 14:14 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-10-06 10:05 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-10-06 05:53 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-10-06 01:45 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-10-05 21:36 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-10-05 17:26 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-10-05 13:18 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-10-05 09:09 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-10-05 04:59 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-10-05 00:49 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-10-04 20:37 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-10-04 16:28 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-10-04 12:19 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-10-04 08:10 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-10-04 04:00 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-10-03 23:52 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-10-03 19:43 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-10-03 15:34 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-10-03 11:25 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-10-03 07:15 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-10-03 03:06 UTCVendor advisory

Publicly available exploits

(19 references, 10 shown)

Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (5 Metasploit modules, 3 Exploit-DB entries, 7 GitHub PoCs), as are 1 Nuclei detection template, 3 GitHub checker repositories. A detection template checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code. A GitHub repository named or described as a checker or scanner checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code. Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.

  • Metasploitexploit/linux/http/mobileiron_core_log4shell✓ verified
    Published Aug 2, 2022

    MobileIron Core Unauthenticated JNDI Injection RCE (via Log4Shell)

    Open source ↗
  • Metasploitexploit/multi/http/ubiquiti_unifi_log4shell✓ verified
    Published Jan 21, 2022

    UniFi Network Application Unauthenticated JNDI Injection RCE (via Log4Shell)

    Open source ↗
  • Metasploitexploit/multi/http/vmware_vcenter_log4shell✓ verified
    Published Jan 19, 2022

    VMware vCenter Server Unauthenticated JNDI Injection RCE (via Log4Shell)

    Open source ↗
  • Metasploitexploit/multi/http/log4shell_header_injection✓ verified
    Published Jan 11, 2022

    Rapid7-maintained Metasploit module exploiting Log4j JNDI lookup injection via HTTP headers.

    Open source ↗
  • Metasploitauxiliary/scanner/http/log4shell_scanner✓ verified
    Published Dec 16, 2021

    Log4Shell HTTP Scanner

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCkozmer/log4j-shell-poc✓ verified
    Published Dec 11, 2021

    Self-contained Python PoC with a built-in LDAP+HTTP listener — minimal setup.

    Open source ↗
  • Exploit-DBEDB-51183
    Published Apr 1, 2023

    AD Manager Plus 7122 - Remote Code Execution (RCE)

    Open source ↗
  • Exploit-DBEDB-50590
    Published Dec 14, 2021

    Apache Log4j2 2.14.1 - Information Disclosure

    Open source ↗
  • Exploit-DBEDB-50592
    Published Dec 14, 2021

    Apache Log4j 2 - Remote Code Execution (RCE)

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCfox-it/log4j-finder
    Published Dec 14, 2021

    Find vulnerable Log4j2 versions on disk and also inside Java Archive Files (Log4Shell CVE-2021-44228, CVE-2021-45046, CVE-2021-45105)

    Open source ↗

Past incidents using this CVE

(1)

This CVE was central to one or more publicly-documented breaches. Each card links to authoritative reporting at the time of the incident.

  • Log4Shell (Apache Log4j)Dec 2021

    JNDI lookup injection in Log4j, a ubiquitous Java logging library. Pre-auth unauthenticated RCE; Apache Foundation called it the worst vulnerability in a decade. Active exploitation continues 3+ years later.

    Source: Wired

Frequently asked(6)

What is CVE-2021-44228?
CVE-2021-44228 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on December 10, 2021. Apache Log4j2 2.0-beta9 through 2.15.0 (excluding security releases 2.12.2, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1) JNDI features used in configuration, log messages, and parameters do not protect against attacker controlled LDAP and other JNDI related endpoints. An attacker who can control log messages or log message…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2021-44228 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2021-44228 was published on December 10, 2021. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of August 11, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2021-44228 actively exploited?
Yes. CISA added CVE-2021-44228 to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on December 10, 2021, affecting Apache Log4j2. KEV listing indicates confirmed exploitation in the wild; this CVE warrants immediate attention. A fix is available. Apply it.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2021-44228?
CVE-2021-44228 has a CVSS v3 base score of 10.0 (NVD).
Which products are affected by CVE-2021-44228?
CVE-2021-44228 affects Apache Log4j2. The affected packages EchelonGraph has on record, with version ranges, are listed in the Affected Packages section of this page.
How do I remediate CVE-2021-44228?
A fix for CVE-2021-44228 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2021-44228 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2021-44228

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2021-44228?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.