Apache Log4j2 2.0-beta9 through 2.15.0 (excluding security releases 2.12.2, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1) JNDI features used in configuration, log messages, and parameters do not protect against attacker controlled LDAP and other JNDI related endpoints. An attacker who can control log messages or log message parameters can execute arbitrary code loaded from LDAP servers when message lookup substitution is enabled. From log4j 2.15.0, this behavior has been disabled by default. From version 2.16.0 (along with 2.12.2, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1), this functionality has been completely removed. Note that this vulnerability is specific to log4j-core and does not affect log4net, log4cxx, or other Apache Logging Services projects.
CVE-2021-44228
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
Score elevated to 10.0 because this CVE is listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2021-12-10), indicating real-world exploitation has been confirmed by US federal agencies. NVD baseline CVSS 10.0 retained for reference. Confidence: HIGH.
Also known asEUVD-2021-34768 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-jfh8-c2jp-5v3q (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- Actively exploited in the wild (CISA-KEV) — the reason this is sooner than the SSVC decision on this page at low mission impact
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 10.0
- EG Score
- 10.0CRITICALhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 100EG Risk 100/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity100% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 10.0 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation100% × 40%Fixed at 100% for a CISA KEV listing: EchelonGraph's rule.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Attend at low mission impact; Act at medium or high.Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it sooner than your standard update timelines at low mission impact and as soon as possible at medium or high. - EPSS PROB
- >99.9%
- EPSS %ILE
- 100th
- KEV
- ⚠ Exploited
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (10.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 10.0 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 10.0 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- >99.9% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- CISA KEV and EG-KEV Tier 1 (exploited in the wild)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Act at medium mission impactAttend at low mission impact; Act at medium or high.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 3 days & forensic triage if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Attend at low mission impact; Act at medium or high.
A fix is available. Apply it sooner than your standard update timelines at low mission impact and as soon as possible at medium or high.
Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 3 days & forensic triage if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV yes (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
CISA required action“For all affected software assets for which updates exist, the only acceptable remediation actions are: 1) Apply updates; OR 2) remove affected assets from agency networks. Temporary mitigations using one of the measures provided at https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/ed-22-02-apache-log4j-recommended-mitigation-measures are only acceptable until updates are available.”
Quoted verbatim from CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. CISA directs it at US federal civilian executive branch agencies under Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 26-04, which replaced BOD 22-01 on 10 June 2026; it is not EchelonGraph's advice. CISA's notes: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-44228
Published
December 10, 2021
Last Modified
August 11, 2026
Advisory Details (10)
Auto-updated Oct 28, 2026Packet Storm
http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/165371/VMware-Security-Advisory-2021-0028.4.htmlPacket Storm
http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/165307/Log4j-Remote-Code-Execution-Word-Bypassing.htmlPacket Storm
http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/165306/L4sh-Log4j-Remote-Code-Execution.htmlPacket Storm
http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/165270/Apache-Log4j2-2.14.1-Remote-Code-Execution.htmlPacket Storm
http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/165261/Apache-Log4j2-2.14.1-Information-Disclosure.htmlVendor Advisories for CVE-2021-44228(20)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- 2026-098-AWSAWS Security BulletinsHigh
CVE-2026-85656 - OS command injection in Amazon log4j-cve-2021-44228-hotpatch
- RHSA-2025:1747Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.3.12 security update
- RHSA-2025:1746Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.1.9 on RHEL 7 security update
- RHSA-2022:0296Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Process Automation Manager 7.12.0 security update
- RHSA-2022:0203Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Fuse 7.8-7.10 security update
- RHSA-2022:0082Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Process Automation Manager 7.11.1 security update
- RHSA-2021:5107Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: OpenShift Container Platform 4.7.40 security update
- CVE-2021-44228Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC)Critical
Apache Log4j Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
- +12 more
Patch Availability(30)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ubuntu | liblog4j2-java-doc (2.4-2ubuntu0.1~esm1) @ xenial | 2026-11-01 | ubuntu |
| ubuntu | liblog4j2-java (2.15.0-0.21.04.1) @ hirsute | 2026-11-01 | ubuntu |
| ubuntu | liblog4j2-java (2.16.0-0.21.10.1) @ impish | 2026-11-01 | ubuntu |
| redhat | eap7-wildfly-0:7.3.12-3.GA_redhat_00002.1.el7eap | 2025-02-24 | redhat |
| redhat | eap7-wildfly-0:7.1.9-2.GA_redhat_00002.1.ep7.el7 | 2025-02-24 | redhat |
| redhat | log4j-core | 2022-01-26 | redhat |
| redhat | patch | 2022-01-11 | redhat |
| redhat | openshift4/ose-metering-presto:v4.6.0-202112150545.p0.g190688a.assembly.art3595 | 2021-12-16 | redhat |
| redhat | openshift4/ose-metering-hive:v4.6.0-202112140546.p0.g8b9da97.assembly.stream | 2021-12-16 | redhat |
| redhat | openshift4/ose-metering-presto:v4.7.0-202112150631.p0.gd502108.assembly.4.7.40 | 2021-12-16 | redhat |
| redhat | org.apache.logging.log4j/log4j-api:2.17.1.redhat-00002 | 2021-12-15 | redhat |
| redhat | openshift4/ose-metering-presto:v4.8.0-202112150431.p0.g4b934ae.assembly.art3599 | 2021-12-15 | redhat |
| redhat | openshift3/ose-logging-elasticsearch5:v3.11.570-2.gd119820 | 2021-12-14 | redhat |
| redhat | patch | 2021-12-14 | redhat |
| redhat | openshift4/ose-metering-hive:v4.8.0-202112132154.p0.g57dd03a.assembly.stream | 2021-12-14 | redhat |
| redhat | patch | 2021-12-14 | redhat |
| redhat | openshift-logging/elasticsearch6-rhel8:v6.8.1-67 | 2021-12-14 | redhat |
| redhat | openshift-logging/elasticsearch6-rhel8:v6.8.1-65 | 2021-12-14 | redhat |
| redhat | openshift-logging/elasticsearch6-rhel8:v6.8.1-66 | 2021-12-14 | redhat |
| redhat | openshift-logging/elasticsearch6-rhel8:v5.0.10-1 | 2021-12-14 | redhat |
| maven | com.guicedee.services:log4j-core | — | ghsa |
| maven | org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-core @ 2.3.1 (fixes >= 2.0-beta9, < 2.3.1) | — | ghsa |
| maven | org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-core @ 2.12.2 (fixes >= 2.4, < 2.12.2) | — | ghsa |
| maven | org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-core @ 2.15.0 (fixes >= 2.13.0, < 2.15.0) | — | ghsa |
| maven | org.ops4j.pax.logging:pax-logging-log4j2 @ 1.9.2 (fixes >= 1.8.0, < 1.9.2) | — | ghsa |
| maven | org.ops4j.pax.logging:pax-logging-log4j2 @ 1.11.10 (fixes >= 1.11.0, < 1.11.10) | — | ghsa |
| maven | org.ops4j.pax.logging:pax-logging-log4j2 @ 2.0.11 (fixes >= 2.0.0, < 2.0.11) | — | ghsa |
| maven | org.ops4j.pax.logging:pax-logging-log4j2 @ 1.10.8 (fixes >= 1.10.0, < 1.10.8) | — | ghsa |
| maven | org.xbib.elasticsearch:log4j | — | ghsa |
| maven | uk.co.nichesolutions.logging.log4j:log4j-core | — | ghsa |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(11 across 7 ecosystems)
Maven(5)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| com.guicedee.services:log4j-core | 1.0.10.0 ... 1.2.1.2-jre17 (362 versions) |
| — |
| org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-core | 2.10.0 ... 2.9.1 (18 versions) |
| — |
| org.ops4j.pax.logging:pax-logging-log4j2 | 2.0.0 ... 2.0.9 (11 versions) |
| — |
| org.xbib.elasticsearch:log4j | 6.3.2.1 | — | — |
| uk.co.nichesolutions.logging.log4j:log4j-core | 2.6.3-CUSTOM | — | — |
Debian:10(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| apache-log4j2 | 2.11.1-2, 2.11.2-1, 2.13.3-1 |
| — |
Debian:11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| apache-log4j2 | 2.13.3-1, 2.15.0-1~deb10u1 |
| — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| apache-log4j2 | — |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| apache-log4j2 | — |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| apache-log4j2 | — |
| — |
Debian:9(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| apache-log4j2 | 2.7-2 |
| — |
Weakness Classification(4)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Additional Vendor Advisories
(6)
Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.
- Red HatRHSA-2021:5093CRITICAL2021-12-10
RHSA-2021:5093 — Critical
- Red HatRHSA-2021:5094CRITICAL2021-12-10
RHSA-2021:5094 — Critical
- Red HatRHSA-2021:5108CRITICAL2021-12-10
RHSA-2021:5108 — Critical
- Red HatRHSA-2021:5126CRITICAL2021-12-10
RHSA-2021:5126 — Critical
- Red HatRHSA-2021:5130CRITICAL2021-12-10
RHSA-2021:5130 — Critical
- UbuntuUSN-5192-1HIGH
Apache Log4j 2 vulnerability
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 16× in last 7d / 97× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 876 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 776 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-11-02 03:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-02 03:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-11-02 03:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jfh8-c2jp-5v3q · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-11-01 08:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jfh8-c2jp-5v3q · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-11-01 08:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-01 03:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-01 03:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-31 02:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 02:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-30 01:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-30 01:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-29 00:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-29 00:44 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-27 23:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-27 23:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-26 23:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 22:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-25 18:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 21:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 21:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-23 20:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-23 20:33 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-22 19:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 19:44 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-21 18:56 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-21 18:56 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-20 18:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-20 18:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-19 17:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 17:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-18 16:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-18 12:30 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-18 08:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 11:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 11:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-16 10:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 10:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-15 10:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 10:01 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-14 09:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 09:10 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-13 08:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-12 19:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 07:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-12 03:22 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 23:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 23:13 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 19:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 19:03 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 14:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 10:44 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 06:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 02:22 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 22:12 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 18:02 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 13:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 09:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 05:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 01:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 21:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 17:00 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 12:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 08:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 04:29 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 00:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 20:12 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 16:03 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 11:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 07:44 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 03:35 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 23:26 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 19:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 15:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 10:59 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 06:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 02:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 22:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 18:23 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 14:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 10:05 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 05:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 01:45 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 21:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 17:26 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 13:18 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 09:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 04:59 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 00:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 20:37 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 16:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 12:19 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 08:10 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 04:00 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 23:52 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 19:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 15:34 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 11:25 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 07:15 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 03:06 UTCVendor advisory
Publicly available exploits
(19 references, 10 shown)Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (5 Metasploit modules, 3 Exploit-DB entries, 7 GitHub PoCs), as are 1 Nuclei detection template, 3 GitHub checker repositories. A detection template checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code. A GitHub repository named or described as a checker or scanner checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code. Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.
- Metasploitexploit/linux/http/mobileiron_core_log4shell✓ verifiedPublished Aug 2, 2022
MobileIron Core Unauthenticated JNDI Injection RCE (via Log4Shell)
Open source ↗ - Metasploitexploit/multi/http/ubiquiti_unifi_log4shell✓ verifiedPublished Jan 21, 2022
UniFi Network Application Unauthenticated JNDI Injection RCE (via Log4Shell)
Open source ↗ - Metasploitexploit/multi/http/vmware_vcenter_log4shell✓ verifiedPublished Jan 19, 2022
VMware vCenter Server Unauthenticated JNDI Injection RCE (via Log4Shell)
Open source ↗ - Metasploitexploit/multi/http/log4shell_header_injection✓ verifiedPublished Jan 11, 2022
Rapid7-maintained Metasploit module exploiting Log4j JNDI lookup injection via HTTP headers.
Open source ↗ - Metasploitauxiliary/scanner/http/log4shell_scanner✓ verifiedPublished Dec 16, 2021
Log4Shell HTTP Scanner
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCkozmer/log4j-shell-poc✓ verifiedPublished Dec 11, 2021
Self-contained Python PoC with a built-in LDAP+HTTP listener — minimal setup.
Open source ↗ - Exploit-DBEDB-51183Published Apr 1, 2023
AD Manager Plus 7122 - Remote Code Execution (RCE)
Open source ↗ - Exploit-DBEDB-50590Published Dec 14, 2021
Apache Log4j2 2.14.1 - Information Disclosure
Open source ↗ - Exploit-DBEDB-50592Published Dec 14, 2021
Apache Log4j 2 - Remote Code Execution (RCE)
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCfox-it/log4j-finderPublished Dec 14, 2021
Find vulnerable Log4j2 versions on disk and also inside Java Archive Files (Log4Shell CVE-2021-44228, CVE-2021-45046, CVE-2021-45105)
Open source ↗
Past incidents using this CVE
(1)This CVE was central to one or more publicly-documented breaches. Each card links to authoritative reporting at the time of the incident.
- Log4Shell (Apache Log4j)Dec 2021
JNDI lookup injection in Log4j, a ubiquitous Java logging library. Pre-auth unauthenticated RCE; Apache Foundation called it the worst vulnerability in a decade. Active exploitation continues 3+ years later.
Source: Wired
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownDebian:10:apache-log4j2 · Debian:9:apache-log4j2 · Debian:11:apache-log4j2
- CVE-2021-45105NVD 5.9EG 9.0EPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2021-45046EG 9.0 KEVEPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2021-44832NVD 6.6EG 9.0EPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2020-9488EG 3.7EPSS p95LOW
- CVE-2017-5645EG 9.8EPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2026-34480EG 7.5HIGH
- CVE-2025-68161EG 4.8MEDIUM
- CVE-2026-34481EG 7.5HIGH
- CVE-2026-34479EG 7.5HIGH
- CVE-2026-49844EG 5.9MEDIUM
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2021:5094 · redhat:RHSA-2021:5127 · redhat:RHSA-2021:5107
- CVE-2021-45046EG 9.0 KEVEPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2021-37137EG 7.5EPSS p94HIGH
- CVE-2021-37136EG 7.5EPSS p93HIGH
- CVE-2021-21409EG 5.9EPSS p92MEDIUM
- CVE-2021-4104NVD 7.5EG 8.9EPSS p100HIGH
- CVE-2022-45047EG 9.8EPSS p90CRITICAL
- CVE-2022-42889EG 9.8EPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2022-1471NVD 8.3EG 9.0EPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2020-13936EG 8.8EPSS p98HIGH
- CVE-2022-46363EG 7.5HIGH
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-20 · CWE-400 · CWE-502
- CVE-2021-43803NVD 7.5EG 8.0EPSS p99HIGH
- CVE-2021-43802EG 9.9CRITICAL
- CVE-2021-38951EG 7.5HIGH
- CVE-2021-41014EG 7.5HIGH
- CVE-2021-37068EG 7.5HIGH
- CVE-2021-37061EG 7.5HIGH
- CVE-2021-44527EG 6.5MEDIUM
- CVE-2021-42130EG 8.9EPSS p99HIGH
- CVE-2021-42127EG 9.8EPSS p99CRITICAL
- CVE-2021-42125NVD 8.8EG 9.0EPSS p100CRITICAL
Frequently asked(6)
What is CVE-2021-44228?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2021-44228 published?
Is CVE-2021-44228 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2021-44228?
Which products are affected by CVE-2021-44228?
How do I remediate CVE-2021-44228?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2021-44228
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2021-44228?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.