CVE-2021-37701

HIGHNVD 8.28.2
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This high-severity CVE scores 8.2 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.1%, top 73% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, nvd
8.2
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 3%CVSS: 8.2Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

The npm package "tar" (aka node-tar) before versions 4.4.16, 5.0.8, and 6.1.7 has an arbitrary file creation/overwrite and arbitrary code execution vulnerability. node-tar aims to guarantee that any file whose location would be modified by a symbolic link is not extracted. This is, in part, achieved by ensuring that extracted directories are not symlinks. Additionally, in order to prevent unnecessary stat calls to determine whether a given path is a directory, paths are cached when directories are created. This logic was insufficient when extracting tar files that contained both a directory and a symlink with the same name as the directory, where the symlink and directory names in the archive entry used backslashes as a path separator on posix systems. The cache checking logic used both \ and / characters as path separators, however \ is a valid filename character on posix systems. By first creating a directory, and then replacing that directory with a symlink, it was thus possible to bypass node-tar symlink checks on directories, essentially allowing an untrusted tar file to symlink into an arbitrary location and subsequently extracting arbitrary files into that location, thus allowing arbitrary file creation and overwrite. Additionally, a similar confusion could arise on case-insensitive filesystems. If a tar archive contained a directory at FOO, followed by a symbolic link named foo, then on case-insensitive file systems, the creation of the symbolic link would remove the directory from the filesystem, but _not_ from the internal directory cache, as it would not be treated as a cache hit. A subsequent file entry within the FOO directory would then be placed in the target of the symbolic link, thinking that the directory had already been created. These issues were addressed in releases 4.4.16, 5.0.8 and 6.1.7. The v3 branch of node-tar has been deprecated and did not receive patches for these issues. If you are still using a v3 release we recommend you update to a more recent version of node-tar. If this is not possible, a workaround is available in the referenced GHSA-9r2w-394v-53qc.

CVSS v3
8.2
EG Score
8.2(medium)
EPSS
87.2%
KEV
Not listed

Published

August 31, 2021

Last Modified

November 21, 2024

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2021-37701(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(9)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
redhatnodejs:12-8040020220523155137.522a0ee42022-07-19redhat
redhatnodejs:12-8020020220523154454.4cda2c842022-06-28redhat
redhatnodejs:12-8060020220523160029.ad008a3a2022-06-21redhat
redhatnodejs:12-8010020220518102644.c27ad7f82022-06-07redhat
redhatrh-nodejs12-nodejs-0:12.22.12-2.el72022-06-06redhat
redhatnodejs:14-8050020211213115342.c53685002022-02-01redhat
redhatnodejs:14-8040020211213111158.522a0ee42022-01-25redhat
redhatrh-nodejs14-nodejs-nodemon-0:2.0.3-6.el72022-01-06redhat
redhatodf/odf-multicluster-rhel8-operator:4.9-30.007b3d8.release_4.92021-12-13redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
npm(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
tar6.1.7

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(7)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 13× in last 7d / 43× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-21 15:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-21 15:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-20 17:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-19 14:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-19 14:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-18 13:29 UTCOSV refresh
  10. 2026-07-18 10:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-18 10:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-16 17:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-16 17:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-15 16:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-15 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-13 22:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-12 05:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-12 05:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-11 08:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-11 08:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-09 19:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-08 15:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-07 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-06 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-06 02:21 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 69 more
  1. 2026-07-05 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-05 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-04 06:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-04 06:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-01 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-06-30 23:20 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-06-30 23:20 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-06-30 16:30 UTCOSV refresh
  9. 2026-06-29 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-06-28 04:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-06-28 04:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-06-27 03:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-22 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-22 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-15 17:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-14 23:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-13 22:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-13 22:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-12 23:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-12 23:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-12 23:07 UTCOSV refresh
  38. 2026-06-11 13:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-10 22:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-10 13:20 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-08 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-08 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-07 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-07 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-05 22:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-04 13:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-04 13:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-02 20:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-02 20:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-01 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-01 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-05-29 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-05-29 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-05-28 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-05-28 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-05-27 13:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-05-27 13:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-05-27 13:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-05-26 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-05-26 11:14 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-05-26 11:14 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-05-26 07:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-05-26 07:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-05-26 07:17 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2021-37701?
CVE-2021-37701 is a high vulnerability published on August 31, 2021. The npm package "tar" (aka node-tar) before versions 4.4.16, 5.0.8, and 6.1.7 has an arbitrary file creation/overwrite and arbitrary code execution vulnerability. node-tar aims to guarantee that any file whose location would be modified by a symbolic link is not extracted. This is, in part,…
When was CVE-2021-37701 disclosed?
CVE-2021-37701 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on August 31, 2021, with the most recent update on November 21, 2024. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2021-37701 actively exploited?
CVE-2021-37701 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 87.2% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2021-37701?
CVE-2021-37701 has a CVSS v3 base score of 8.2 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2021-37701?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2021-37701, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2021-37701

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2021-37701?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.