XStream is software for serializing Java objects to XML and back again. A vulnerability in XStream versions prior to 1.4.17 may allow a remote attacker has sufficient rights to execute commands of the host only by manipulating the processed input stream. No user who followed the recommendation to setup XStream's security framework with a whitelist limited to the minimal required types is affected. The vulnerability is patched in version 1.4.17.
CVE-2021-29505
“▲” beside the score: it is higher than NVD's CVSS score.
Score elevated to 9.0 because EPSS predicted 77% probability of exploitation within the next 30 days (99th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs) when EchelonGraph scored this CVE. NVD baseline CVSS 8.8 retained for reference. Confidence: see factors.
Also known asEUVD-2021-0996 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-7chv-rrw6-w6fc (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- High exploitation likelihood — EPSS 77%
- Public exploit or proof-of-concept code is available
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 8.8
- EG Score
- 9.0CRITICALhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 70EG Risk 70/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity88% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation77% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 77%
- EPSS %ILE
- 99th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (9.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.0 is EPSS's lift toward 9.0 from its impact severity (EG Severity, CVSS 8.8 HIGH): a likelihood of exploitation, not impact.
- EG Severity
- 8.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
- EG Likelihood
- 77% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
May 28, 2021
Last Modified
October 7, 2026
Advisory Details (10)
Auto-updated Oct 7, 2026[SECURITY] [DSA 5004-1] libxstream-java security update
https://www.debian.org/security/2021/dsa-5004[SECURITY] Fedora 34 Update: xstream-1.4.18-2.fc34 - package-announce - Fedora mailing-lists
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/QGXIU3YDPG6OGTDHMBLAFN7BPBERXREB[SECURITY] Fedora 35 Update: xstream-1.4.18-2.fc35 - package-announce - Fedora mailing-lists
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/PVPHZA7VW2RRSDCOIPP2W6O5ND254TU7[SECURITY] Fedora 33 Update: xstream-1.4.18-2.fc33 - package-announce - Fedora mailing-lists
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/22KVR6B5IZP3BGQ3HPWIO2FWWCKT3DHP[SECURITY] [DLA 2704-1] libxstream-java security update
https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/07/msg00004.htmlPony Mail
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r8ee51debf7fd184b6a6b020dc31df25118b0aa612885f12fbe77f04f@%3Cdev.jmeter.apache.org%3Ecommit f0c4a8d861b6 (x-stream/xstream)
Fix landed in x-stream/xstream commit f0c4a8d861b6 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/x-stream/xstream/commit/f0c4a8d861b68ffc3119cfbbbd632deee624e227commit 24fac8219129 (x-stream/xstream)
Fix landed in x-stream/xstream commit 24fac8219129 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/x-stream/xstream/commit/24fac82191292c6ae25f94508d28b9823f83624fXStream is vulnerable to a Remote Command Execution attack · Advisory · x-stream/xstream · GitHub
https://github.com/x-stream/xstream/security/advisories/GHSA-7chv-rrw6-w6fcVendor Advisories for CVE-2021-29505(6)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2022:5532Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Fuse 7.11.0 release and security update
- RHSA-2022:0520Red Hat Product SecurityMedium
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Data Grid 8.3.0 security update
- RHSA-2022:0297Red Hat Product SecurityMedium
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Decision Manager 7.12.0 security update
- RHSA-2022:0296Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Process Automation Manager 7.12.0 security update
- RHSA-2021:4918Red Hat Product SecurityMedium
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Integration Camel-K 1.6 release and security update
- RHSA-2021:4767Red Hat Product SecurityMedium
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Integration Camel Extensions for Quarkus GA security update
Patch Availability(4)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | xstream | 2022-07-07 | redhat |
| redhat | patch | 2021-11-23 | redhat |
| redhat | xstream-0:1.3.1-14.el7_9 | 2021-07-12 | redhat |
| maven | com.thoughtworks.xstream:xstream @ 1.4.17 (fixes < 1.4.17) | — | ghsa |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(6 across 6 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| libxstream-java | — |
| — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| libxstream-java | — |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| libxstream-java | — |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| libxstream-java | — |
| — |
Debian:9(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| libxstream-java | 1.4.10-1 ... 1.4.9-2+deb9u1 (7 versions) |
| — |
Maven(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| com.thoughtworks.xstream:xstream | 0.1 ... 1.4.9 (41 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(3)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Additional Vendor Advisories
(1)
Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 19× in last 7d / 69× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 97 of 166 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 3 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 69 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-11-02 08:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-02 08:10 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-11-02 08:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7chv-rrw6-w6fc · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-11-01 09:29 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-11-01 09:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7chv-rrw6-w6fc · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-11-01 08:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7chv-rrw6-w6fc · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-11-01 08:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 10:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 10:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-30 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 77% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-30 12:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-30 12:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-29 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 77% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-29 13:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-29 13:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-28 14:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-28 14:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-27 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 77% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-27 15:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-26 17:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-26 17:01 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-26 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 77% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-25 18:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 18:04 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-25 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 77% · 99th percentile
Show 72 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-24 18:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 18:59 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-24 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 77% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-23 20:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-23 20:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-22 21:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 21:39 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-22 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 77% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-21 22:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-21 22:59 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-21 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 77% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-21 00:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-21 00:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-20 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 77% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-20 01:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-20 01:39 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-19 00:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 00:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-18 09:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-18 01:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-18 01:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-17 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 77% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-17 03:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 03:15 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-16 04:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 04:35 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-15 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 77% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-15 03:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 03:03 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-14 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 77% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-13 23:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-13 23:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-12 19:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-12 19:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 23:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 77% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 77% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 77% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-07 21:46 UTCEG score recompute▲ 0.20
- 2026-10-07 21:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 21:23 UTCNVD updateCVSS v3 → 8.8
- 2026-10-07 20:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-07 20:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 15:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 77% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 77% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-02 16:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 77% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-30 15:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 77% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 77% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 77% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-26 01:15 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-24 14:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 77% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-21 20:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 77% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 77% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-17 19:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 77% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 77% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-13 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 77% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-12 14:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 77% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-06 16:31 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 77% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-05 15:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 77% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-04 13:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 77% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-01 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 77% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-30 19:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 77% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-30 01:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 77% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 77% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 77% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-25 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 77% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-24 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 77% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-21 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 77% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-20 22:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 77% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-20 02:15 UTCOSV refresh
Publicly available exploits
(2 references)Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 GitHub PoC), as is 1 Nuclei detection template. A detection template checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code. Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.
- Nucleihttp/cves/2021/CVE-2021-29505.yamlPublished Mar 29, 2023
XStream <1.4.17 - Remote Code Execution
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCMyBlackManba/CVE-2021-29505Published Jun 8, 2021
对CVE-2021-29505进行复现,并分析学了下Xstream反序列化过程
Open source ↗
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownDebian:9:libxstream-java
- CVE-2021-21345EG 9.9EPSS p99CRITICAL
- CVE-2021-21350EG 9.8EPSS p97CRITICAL
- CVE-2021-21347EG 9.8EPSS p97CRITICAL
- CVE-2021-21346EG 9.8EPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2021-21344EG 9.8EPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2021-21351EG 9.1EPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2021-21342EG 9.1EPSS p99CRITICAL
- CVE-2021-39144NVD 8.5EG 9.0 KEVEPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2020-26217NVD 8.8EG 9.0EPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2020-26259NVD 6.8EG 8.9EPSS p100HIGH
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2021:4767
- CVE-2021-39144NVD 8.5EG 9.0 KEVEPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2021-39139EG 8.8EPSS p92HIGH
- CVE-2021-39152EG 8.5EPSS p96HIGH
- CVE-2021-39150EG 8.5HIGH
- CVE-2021-39154EG 8.5EPSS p92HIGH
- CVE-2021-39153EG 8.5EPSS p91HIGH
- CVE-2021-39151EG 8.5EPSS p92HIGH
- CVE-2021-39149EG 8.5EPSS p92HIGH
- CVE-2021-39148EG 8.5EPSS p92HIGH
- CVE-2021-39147EG 8.5EPSS p92HIGH
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-94 · CWE-74 · CWE-502
- CVE-2021-32621EG 8.8HIGH
- CVE-2021-22519EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2021-32642EG 7.0HIGH
- CVE-2021-30461EG 9.8EPSS p98CRITICAL
- CVE-2021-33564EG 9.8EPSS p99CRITICAL
- CVE-2021-27852EG 9.8 KEVEPSS p98CRITICAL
- CVE-2021-22900NVD 7.2EG 9.0 KEVEPSS p97CRITICAL
- CVE-2021-22894NVD 8.8EG 9.0 KEVEPSS p99CRITICAL
- CVE-2021-33790EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2021-29210EG 4.8MEDIUM
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2021-29505?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2021-29505 published?
Is CVE-2021-29505 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2021-29505?
How do I remediate CVE-2021-29505?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2021-29505
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2021-29505?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.