When using Apache Tomcat versions 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M4, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.34, 8.5.0 to 8.5.54 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.103 if a) an attacker is able to control the contents and name of a file on the server; and b) the server is configured to use the PersistenceManager with a FileStore; and c) the PersistenceManager is configured with sessionAttributeValueClassNameFilter="null" (the default unless a SecurityManager is used) or a sufficiently lax filter to allow the attacker provided object to be deserialized; and d) the attacker knows the relative file path from the storage location used by FileStore to the file the attacker has control over; then, using a specifically crafted request, the attacker will be able to trigger remote code execution via deserialization of the file under their control. Note that all of conditions a) to d) must be true for the attack to succeed.
CVE-2020-9484
“▲” beside the score: it is higher than NVD's CVSS score.
Score elevated to 7.9 because EPSS predicted 56% probability of exploitation within the next 30 days (99th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs) when EchelonGraph scored this CVE. NVD baseline CVSS 7.0 retained for reference. Confidence: see factors.
Also known asEUVD-2020-0404 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-344f-f5vg-2jfj (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- 90 internet-facing services (distinct ip:port) on record running an affected version — derived from Shodan data (© Shodan); a patched service can stay counted while its port stays open
- High exploitation likelihood — EPSS 56%
- Public exploit or proof-of-concept code is available
A fix is available — apply it.
90 internet-facing services (distinct ip:port) on record running a version that maps to CVE-2020-9484, in our KEV-Exposure radar’s Shodan-derived sample.
How it counts: every 12 hours, when Shodan query credits allow, the radar runs one Shodan query per tracked product, reads up to 100 ip:port services per query, and keeps a service when its banner version matches a CISA-KEV or high-EPSS CVE; a service is dropped when neither a search nor a Shodan InternetDB port re-check has refreshed it for 21 days. A re-check that finds the port still listed by Shodan InternetDB refreshes the service without re-reading the banner, so a patched service can stay counted while its port stays open. A count is a banner-version inference over a sample, not an exploit test and not an internet-wide census, and the unit is a service, not a machine: a machine answering on two ports counts twice.
- CVSS v3
- 7.0
- EG Score
- 7.9HIGHhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 54EG Risk 54/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity70% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.0 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation56% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 56%
- EPSS %ILE
- 99th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (7.9): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.9 is EPSS's lift toward 9.0 from its impact severity (EG Severity, CVSS 7.0 HIGH): a likelihood of exploitation, not impact.
- EG Severity
- 7.0 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 56% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-31). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
May 20, 2020
Last Modified
October 8, 2026
Advisory Details (8)
Auto-updated Aug 25, 2026oss-security - CVE-2021-25329: Apache Tomcat Incomplete fix for CVE-2020-9484
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/01/2Full Disclosure: [CVE-2020-9484] Apache Tomcat RCE via PersistentManager
http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2020/Jun/6Locked Out | Packet Storm
http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/157924/Apache-Tomcat-CVE-2020-9484-Proof-Of-Concept.htmlVendor Advisories for CVE-2020-9484(10)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2022:5532Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Fuse 7.11.0 release and security update
- RHSA-2021:3140Red Hat Product SecurityMedium
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Fuse 7.9.0 release and security update
- RHSA-2020:3017Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat support for Spring Boot 2.1.15 security and bug fix update
- RHSA-2020:2530Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: tomcat security update
- RHSA-2020:2529Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: tomcat6 security update
- RHSA-2020:2509Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat JBoss Web Server 5.3.1 security update
- RHSA-2020:2506Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat JBoss Web Server 5.3.1 security update
- RHSA-2020:2487Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat JBoss Web Server 3.1 Service Pack 9 security update
- +2 more
Patch Availability(15)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ubuntu | tomcat7-user (7.0.68-1ubuntu0.4+esm2) @ xenial | 2026-10-28 | ubuntu |
| ubuntu | tomcat9-user (9.0.31-1ubuntu0.6) @ focal | 2026-10-28 | ubuntu |
| ubuntu | tomcat9-user (9.0.31-1ubuntu0.1) @ focal | 2026-10-28 | ubuntu |
| ubuntu | tomcat9-examples (9.0.31-1ubuntu0.2) @ focal | 2026-10-28 | ubuntu |
| ubuntu | tomcat8-user (8.0.32-1ubuntu1.13) @ xenial | 2026-10-28 | ubuntu |
| redhat | patch | 2022-07-07 | redhat |
| redhat | tomcat | 2021-08-11 | redhat |
| redhat | tomcat6-0:6.0.24-115.el6_10 | 2020-06-11 | redhat |
| redhat | tomcat-0:7.0.76-12.el7_8 | 2020-06-11 | redhat |
| redhat | jws5-tomcat-native-0:1.2.23-5.redhat_5.el8jws | 2020-06-10 | redhat |
| redhat | tomcat-native-0:1.2.23-22.redhat_22.ep7.el7 | 2020-06-10 | redhat |
| maven | org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core @ 7.0.104 (fixes >= 7.0.0, < 7.0.104) | — | ghsa |
| maven | org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core @ 10.0.0-M5 (fixes >= 10.0.0-M1, <= 10.0.0-M4) | — | ghsa |
| maven | org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core @ 9.0.35 (fixes >= 9.0.0, < 9.0.35) | — | ghsa |
| maven | org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core @ 8.5.55 (fixes >= 8.0.0, < 8.5.55) | — | ghsa |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(10 across 8 ecosystems)
Debian:8(2)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| tomcat7 | 7.0.56-3 ... 7.0.56-3+really7.0.99-1 (19 versions) |
| — |
| tomcat8 | 8.0.14-1 ... 8.0.14-1+deb8u9 (17 versions) |
| — |
Maven(2)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core | 7.0.0 ... 7.0.99 (70 versions) |
| — |
| org.apache.tomcat:tomcat-catalina | 7.0.0 ... 7.0.99 (70 versions) |
| — |
Debian:10(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| tomcat9 | 9.0.16-4 ... 9.0.31-1~deb10u1 (7 versions) |
| — |
Debian:11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| tomcat9 | — |
| — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| tomcat9 | — |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| tomcat9 | — |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| tomcat9 | — |
| — |
Debian:9(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| tomcat8 | 8.5.14-1 ... 8.5.54-0+deb9u1 (38 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Additional Vendor Advisories
(5)
Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 37× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 94 of 138 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 6 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 44 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-11-01 08:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-344f-f5vg-2jfj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.0
- 2026-11-01 08:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-30 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-29 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-28 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-28 12:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-28 12:35 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-27 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-26 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-25 18:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-24 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-23 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-22 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-21 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-21 11:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-21 11:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-20 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-19 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-18 09:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-16 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-15 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-14 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
Show 69 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-13 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-12 19:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-11 23:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-08 21:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-08 21:25 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 23:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-02 17:40 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-10-02 16:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-30 15:26 UTCEG score recompute▼ 0.10
- 2026-09-30 14:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-27 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-24 14:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-22 14:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 57% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-21 20:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 57% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 57% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-17 19:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 57% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 57% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-15 03:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 57% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-13 15:13 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-12 14:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 57% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-08 21:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 57% · 98th percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 57% · 98th percentile
- 2026-09-05 15:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 57% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-04 13:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 57% · 98th percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 57% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-30 19:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 57% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-30 01:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 57% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 57% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-27 14:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 57% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 57% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-25 16:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-25 16:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-21 23:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 57% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-20 21:01 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-19 17:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 57% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-18 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 57% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-17 13:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 57% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-16 02:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 57% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-15 01:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 57% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-13 21:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 57% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-12 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 57% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-08 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 57% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-06 13:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 57% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-05 13:11 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-04 15:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 57% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-04 10:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 57% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-01 04:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 57% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-30 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 57% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-30 01:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 57% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-26 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 57% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-25 14:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 57% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-24 14:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 57% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-23 01:55 UTCEG score recompute▲ 1.00
- 2026-07-22 22:42 UTCEG score recompute▼ 2.00
- 2026-07-22 14:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 57% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-20 17:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 57% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-19 12:00 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-07-19 02:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 57% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-16 17:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 57% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-15 16:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 57% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-13 22:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 57% · 98th percentile
Publicly available exploits
(13 references, 10 shown)Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (12 GitHub PoCs), as is 1 Nuclei detection template. A detection template checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code. Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.
- GitHub PoC0dayCTF/CVE-2020-9484Published Sep 16, 2024
Remake of CVE-2020-9484 by Pentestical
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCd3fudd/CVE-2020-9484_ExploitPublished Nov 14, 2022
Exploit for Apache Tomcat deserialization (CVE-2020-9484) which could lead to RCE
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCColdFusionX/CVE-2020-9484Published Feb 11, 2022
POC - Apache Tomcat Deserialization Vulnerability (CVE-2020-9484)
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCRepublicR0K/CVE-2020-9484Published May 18, 2021
Apache Tomcat RCE (CVE-2020-9484)
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCVICXOR/CVE-2020-9484Published Feb 10, 2021
POC for CVE-2020-9484
Open source ↗ - Open source ↗GitHub PoCAssassinUKG/CVE-2020-9484Published Jan 26, 2021
- Open source ↗GitHub PoCPenTestical/CVE-2020-9484Published Dec 31, 2020
- Open source ↗GitHub PoCanjai94/CVE-2020-9484-exploitPublished Sep 5, 2020
- Nucleihttp/cves/2020/CVE-2020-9484.yamlPublished Jul 3, 2020
Apache Tomcat Remote Command Execution
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCosamahamad/CVE-2020-9484-Mass-ScanPublished Jun 5, 2020
CVE-2020-9484 Mass Scanner, Scan a list of urls for Apache Tomcat deserialization (CVE-2020-9484) which could lead to RCE
Open source ↗
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownDebian:9:tomcat8 · Debian:10:tomcat9
- CVE-2020-1938EG 9.8 KEVEPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2019-17563EG 7.5EPSS p96HIGH
- CVE-2019-12418EG 7.0HIGH
- CVE-2020-1935EG 4.8EPSS p95MEDIUM
- CVE-2019-0221NVD 6.1EG 7.6EPSS p99HIGH
- CVE-2019-17569EG 4.8EPSS p95MEDIUM
- CVE-2021-25122EG 7.5EPSS p97HIGH
- CVE-2020-11996EG 7.5EPSS p98HIGH
- CVE-2021-25329EG 7.0EPSS p95HIGH
- CVE-2023-24998NVD 7.5EG 8.0EPSS p99HIGH
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2021:3140 · redhat:RHSA-2022:5532
- CVE-2020-13935NVD 7.5EG 9.0EPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2021-41079EG 7.5EPSS p94HIGH
- CVE-2021-25122EG 7.5EPSS p97HIGH
- CVE-2021-25329EG 7.0EPSS p95HIGH
- CVE-2020-13934NVD 7.5EG 8.4EPSS p99HIGH
- CVE-2021-33037NVD 5.3EG 8.3EPSS p100HIGH
- CVE-2020-11996EG 7.5EPSS p98HIGH
- CVE-2022-23181EG 7.0HIGH
- CVE-2021-30640EG 6.5EPSS p96MEDIUM
- CVE-2020-1935EG 4.8EPSS p95MEDIUM
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-502
- CVE-2020-3280EG 9.8EPSS p94CRITICAL
- CVE-2020-7660EG 8.1HIGH
- CVE-2020-5741NVD 7.2EG 9.0 KEVEPSS p99CRITICAL
- CVE-2020-2189EG 8.8HIGH
- CVE-2020-4448EG 9.8EPSS p96CRITICAL
- CVE-2020-4449EG 7.5EPSS p91HIGH
- CVE-2020-4450EG 9.8EPSS p98CRITICAL
- CVE-2020-4043EG 7.7HIGH
- CVE-2020-5411EG 8.1HIGH
- CVE-2020-8164EG 7.5EPSS p92HIGH
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2020-9484?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2020-9484 published?
Is CVE-2020-9484 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2020-9484?
How do I remediate CVE-2020-9484?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2020-9484
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2020-9484?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.