CVE-2020-7247

CRITICALNVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score elevated to 9.8 because this CVE is listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2022-03-25), indicating real-world exploitation has been confirmed by US federal agencies. NVD baseline CVSS 9.8 retained for reference. Confidence: HIGH.

Triggered by: CISA KEV (actively exploited)
Sources: CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 4 sources updated this weekExploited in the wild

Also known asEUVD-2020-28374 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-rcw6-69h3-89fh (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPatch nowTreat as an emergency — this is being exploited.
  • Actively exploited in the wild (CISA-KEV) — the reason this is sooner than the SSVC decision on this page at low mission impact
CISA-KEV: ExploitedEPSS PROB: 99%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: Metasploit · Exploit-DB (verified) · other public PoCExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

smtp_mailaddr in smtp_session.c in OpenSMTPD 6.6, as used in OpenBSD 6.6 and other products, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands as root via a crafted SMTP session, as demonstrated by shell metacharacters in a MAIL FROM field. This affects the "uncommented" default configuration. The issue exists because of an incorrect return value upon failure of input validation.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALhigh confidence
EG Risk
99
EG Risk 99/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation100% × 40%
Fixed at 100% for a CISA KEV listing: EchelonGraph's rule.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Attend at low mission impact; Act at medium or high.
Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it sooner than your standard update timelines at low mission impact and as soon as possible at medium or high.
EPSS PROB
99%
EPSS %ILE
99th
KEV
⚠ Exploited

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
99% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
CISA KEV and EG-KEV Tier 1 (exploited in the wild)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Act at medium mission impactAttend at low mission impact; Act at medium or high.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 3 days & forensic triage if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Attend at low mission impact; Act at medium or high.

A fix is available. Apply it sooner than your standard update timelines at low mission impact and as soon as possible at medium or high.

Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 3 days & forensic triage if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV yes (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

CISA required action“Apply updates per vendor instructions.”

Quoted verbatim from CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. CISA directs it at US federal civilian executive branch agencies under Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 26-04, which replaced BOD 22-01 on 10 June 2026; it is not EchelonGraph's advice. CISA's notes: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-7247

Published

January 29, 2020

Last Modified

November 7, 2025

Advisory Details (10)

Auto-updated Oct 30, 2026
⚠️ Actively exploited (CISA KEV, CISA Vulnrichment). Patch available. Sources: github_commit.
Web page

Bugtraq: [SECURITY] [DSA 4611-1] opensmtpd security update

https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2020/Jan/51
Web page

[SECURITY] Fedora 32 Update: opensmtpd-6.6.4p1-2.fc32 - package-announce - Fedora mailing-lists

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/OPH4QU4DNVHA7ACFXMYFCEP5PSXXPN4E/
GitHub commit

commit 9dcfda045474 (openbsd/src)

Fix landed in openbsd/src commit 9dcfda045474 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/openbsd/src/commit/9dcfda045474d8903224d175907bfc29761dcb45
Web page🟡 PoC Available

oss-security - LPE and RCE in OpenSMTPD (CVE-2020-7247)

http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2020/01/28/3
Web page🟡 PoC Available

Full Disclosure: LPE and RCE in OpenSMTPD (CVE-2020-7247)

http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2020/Jan/49

Patch Availability(2)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntuopensmtpd (6.0.3p1-6ubuntu0.1) @ eoan2026-11-02ubuntu
ubuntuopensmtpd (5.7.3p2-1ubuntu0.1~esm2) @ xenial2026-11-02ubuntu

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(12 across 12 ecosystems)
Alpine:v3.11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
opensmtpd—
  • every version up to 6.6.2p1-r0: fixed in 6.6.2p1-r0
—
Alpine:v3.12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
opensmtpd—
  • every version up to 6.6.2p1-r0: fixed in 6.6.2p1-r0
—
Alpine:v3.13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
opensmtpd—
  • every version up to 6.6.2p1-r0: fixed in 6.6.2p1-r0
—
Alpine:v3.14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
opensmtpd—
  • every version up to 6.6.2p1-r0: fixed in 6.6.2p1-r0
—
Alpine:v3.15(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
opensmtpd—
  • every version up to 6.6.2p1-r0: fixed in 6.6.2p1-r0
—
Alpine:v3.16(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
opensmtpd—
  • every version up to 6.6.2p1-r0: fixed in 6.6.2p1-r0
—
Debian:10(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
opensmtpd6.0.3p1-5, 6.0.3p1-5+deb10u1, 6.0.3p1-5+deb10u2
  • every version up to 6.0.3p1-5+deb10u3: fixed in 6.0.3p1-5+deb10u3
—
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
opensmtpd—
  • every version up to 6.6.2p1-1: fixed in 6.6.2p1-1
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
opensmtpd—
  • every version up to 6.6.2p1-1: fixed in 6.6.2p1-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
opensmtpd—
  • every version up to 6.6.2p1-1: fixed in 6.6.2p1-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
opensmtpd—
  • every version up to 6.6.2p1-1: fixed in 6.6.2p1-1
—
Debian:9(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
opensmtpd6.0.2p1-2, 6.0.2p1-2+deb9u1
  • every version up to 6.0.2p1-2+deb9u2: fixed in 6.0.2p1-2+deb9u2
—

Weakness Classification(3)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(2)

Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 24× in last 7d / 166× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 1,551 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 1,451 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-02 11:54 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-11-02 11:54 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-02 11:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rcw6-69h3-89fh · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  4. 2026-11-01 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 99% · 99th percentile
  5. 2026-11-01 12:49 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-11-01 12:49 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-11-01 12:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rcw6-69h3-89fh · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  8. 2026-10-31 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 99% · 99th percentile
  9. 2026-10-31 13:42 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-31 13:42 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-31 13:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rcw6-69h3-89fh · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  12. 2026-10-30 14:35 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-30 14:35 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-10-30 14:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rcw6-69h3-89fh · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  15. 2026-10-29 15:29 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-29 15:29 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-10-29 15:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rcw6-69h3-89fh · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  18. 2026-10-28 16:23 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-10-28 16:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rcw6-69h3-89fh · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  20. 2026-10-27 17:17 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-27 17:17 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-27 17:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rcw6-69h3-89fh · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  23. 2026-10-26 18:11 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-26 18:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rcw6-69h3-89fh · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  25. 2026-10-25 19:04 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-25 19:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rcw6-69h3-89fh · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  2. 2026-10-25 18:40 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-25 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 99% · 99th percentile
  4. 2026-10-24 19:57 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-24 19:57 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-24 19:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rcw6-69h3-89fh · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  7. 2026-10-23 20:50 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-23 20:50 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-10-23 20:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rcw6-69h3-89fh · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  10. 2026-10-22 21:43 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-22 21:43 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-10-22 21:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rcw6-69h3-89fh · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  13. 2026-10-22 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 99% · 99th percentile
  14. 2026-10-21 22:36 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-21 22:36 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-21 22:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rcw6-69h3-89fh · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  17. 2026-10-20 23:30 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-20 23:30 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-10-20 23:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rcw6-69h3-89fh · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  20. 2026-10-20 00:24 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-20 00:24 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-20 00:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rcw6-69h3-89fh · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  23. 2026-10-19 01:17 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-19 01:17 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-10-19 01:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rcw6-69h3-89fh · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  26. 2026-10-18 09:18 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-10-18 02:10 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-10-18 02:10 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-10-18 02:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rcw6-69h3-89fh · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  30. 2026-10-17 03:04 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-10-17 03:04 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-10-17 03:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rcw6-69h3-89fh · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  33. 2026-10-16 03:58 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-10-16 03:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rcw6-69h3-89fh · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  35. 2026-10-15 04:51 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-10-15 04:51 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-10-15 04:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rcw6-69h3-89fh · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  38. 2026-10-14 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 99% · 99th percentile
  39. 2026-10-14 05:44 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-10-14 05:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rcw6-69h3-89fh · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  41. 2026-10-13 06:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rcw6-69h3-89fh · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  42. 2026-10-12 19:31 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-10-12 07:29 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-10-12 07:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rcw6-69h3-89fh · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  45. 2026-10-12 03:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rcw6-69h3-89fh · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  46. 2026-10-11 23:22 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-10-11 23:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rcw6-69h3-89fh · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  48. 2026-10-11 19:22 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-10-11 19:22 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-10-11 19:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rcw6-69h3-89fh · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  51. 2026-10-11 15:20 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-10-11 15:20 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-10-11 15:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rcw6-69h3-89fh · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  54. 2026-10-11 11:19 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-10-11 11:19 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-10-11 11:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rcw6-69h3-89fh · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  57. 2026-10-11 07:14 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-10-11 07:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rcw6-69h3-89fh · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  59. 2026-10-11 03:13 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-10-11 03:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rcw6-69h3-89fh · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  61. 2026-10-10 23:11 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-10-10 23:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rcw6-69h3-89fh · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  63. 2026-10-10 19:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rcw6-69h3-89fh · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  64. 2026-10-10 15:06 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-10-10 15:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rcw6-69h3-89fh · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  66. 2026-10-10 11:04 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-10-10 11:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rcw6-69h3-89fh · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  68. 2026-10-10 07:03 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-10-10 07:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rcw6-69h3-89fh · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  70. 2026-10-10 03:02 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-10-10 03:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rcw6-69h3-89fh · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  72. 2026-10-09 23:00 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-10-09 23:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rcw6-69h3-89fh · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  74. 2026-10-09 18:59 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-10-09 18:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rcw6-69h3-89fh · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8

Publicly available exploits

(12 references, 10 shown)

Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 Metasploit module, 3 Exploit-DB entries, 7 GitHub PoCs), as is 1 Nuclei detection template. A detection template checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code. Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.

  • Exploit-DBEDB-48051✓ verified
    Published Feb 11, 2020

    OpenSMTPD 6.4.0 < 6.6.1 - Local Privilege Escalation + Remote Code Execution

    Open source ↗
  • Exploit-DBEDB-48038✓ verified
    Published Feb 10, 2020

    OpenSMTPD - MAIL FROM Remote Code Execution (Metasploit)

    Open source ↗
  • Metasploitexploit/unix/smtp/opensmtpd_mail_from_rce✓ verified
    Published Feb 7, 2020

    OpenSMTPD MAIL FROM Remote Code Execution

    Open source ↗
  • Exploit-DBEDB-47984✓ verified
    Published Jan 30, 2020

    OpenSMTPD 6.6.1 - Remote Code Execution

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCpresentdaypresenttime/shai_hulud
    Published Feb 7, 2022

    Worm written in python, abuses CVE-2020-7247

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCSimonSchoeni/CVE-2020-7247-POC
    Published Nov 26, 2021

    Proof of concept for CVE-2020-7247 for educational purposes.

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCf4T1H21/CVE-2020-7247
    Published Jun 19, 2021

    PoC exploit for CVE-2020-7247 OpenSMTPD 6.4.0 < 6.6.1 Remote Code Execution

    Open source ↗
  • Nucleijavascript/cves/2020/CVE-2020-7247.yaml
    Published May 4, 2021

    OpenSMTPD 6.4.0-6.6.1 - Remote Code Execution

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCQTranspose/CVE-2020-7247-exploit
    Published Feb 13, 2021

    OpenSMTPD 6.4.0 - 6.6.1 Remote Code Execution PoC exploit

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCr0lh/CVE-2020-7247
    Published Feb 18, 2020

    Proof Of Concept Exploit for CVE-2020-7247 (Remote Execution on OpenSMTPD < 6.6.2

    Open source ↗

Frequently asked(6)

What is CVE-2020-7247?
CVE-2020-7247 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on January 29, 2020. smtp_mailaddr in smtp_session.c in OpenSMTPD 6.6, as used in OpenBSD 6.6 and other products, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands as root via a crafted SMTP session, as demonstrated by shell metacharacters in a MAIL FROM field. This affects the "uncommented" default configuration.…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2020-7247 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2020-7247 was published on January 29, 2020. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 7, 2025; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2020-7247 actively exploited?
Yes. CISA added CVE-2020-7247 to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on March 25, 2022, affecting OpenBSD OpenSMTPD. KEV listing indicates confirmed exploitation in the wild; this CVE warrants immediate attention. A fix is available. Apply it.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2020-7247?
CVE-2020-7247 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
Which products are affected by CVE-2020-7247?
CVE-2020-7247 affects OpenBSD OpenSMTPD. The affected packages EchelonGraph has on record, with version ranges, are listed in the Affected Packages section of this page.
How do I remediate CVE-2020-7247?
A fix for CVE-2020-7247 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2020-7247

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2020-7247?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.