CVE-2020-1685

MEDIUMNVD 5.85.8—
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This medium-severity CVE scores 5.8 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.8%, top 49% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, nvd
5.8
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 1%CVSS: 5.8Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

When configuring stateless firewall filters in Juniper Networks EX4600 and QFX 5000 Series devices using Virtual Extensible LAN protocol (VXLAN), the discard action will fail to discard traffic under certain conditions. Given a firewall filter configuration similar to: family ethernet-switching { filter L2-VLAN { term ALLOW { from { user-vlan-id 100; } then { accept; } } term NON-MATCH { then { discard; } } when there is only one term containing a 'user-vlan-id' match condition, and no other terms in the firewall filter except discard, the discard action for non-matching traffic will only discard traffic with the same VLAN ID specified under 'user-vlan-id'. Other traffic (e.g. VLAN ID 200) will not be discarded. This unexpected behavior can lead to unintended traffic passing through the interface where the firewall filter is applied. This issue only affects systems using VXLANs. This issue affects Juniper Networks Junos OS on QFX5K Series: 18.1 versions prior to 18.1R3-S7, except 18.1R3; 18.2 versions prior to 18.2R2-S7, 18.2R3-S1; 18.3 versions prior to 18.3R1-S5, 18.3R2-S4, 18.3R3; 18.4 versions prior to 18.4R1-S7, 18.4R2-S1, 18.4R3; 19.1 versions prior to 19.1R1-S5, 19.1R2; 19.2 versions prior to 19.2R1-S5, 19.2R2.

CVSS v3
5.8
EG Score
5.8(medium)
EG Risk
31(Track)
EG Risk 31/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity58% × 45%
Exploitation1% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS
51.4%
KEV
Not listed

Published

October 16, 2020

Last Modified

November 21, 2024

References (2)

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 12× in last 7d / 45× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-23 01:50 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-07-22 22:35 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-07-22 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-21 15:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-21 15:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-20 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-20 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-19 14:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-19 02:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-19 02:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-18 10:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-16 16:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-15 16:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-15 01:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-13 22:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-13 22:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-13 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-13 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-12 05:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-11 08:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-11 08:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-09 19:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-08 15:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-07 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-07 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 71 more
  1. 2026-07-06 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-06 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-06 02:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-06 02:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-05 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-04 06:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-04 06:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-01 15:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-06-30 23:20 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-06-30 23:20 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-06-29 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-06-28 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-28 04:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-28 04:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-27 03:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-25 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-22 14:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-22 14:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-21 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-21 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-21 01:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-21 01:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-19 19:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-18 17:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-17 17:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-16 17:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-16 17:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-15 17:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-14 23:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-13 22:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-13 22:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-12 23:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-11 13:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-10 22:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-10 22:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-10 13:20 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-08 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-08 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-07 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-07 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-05 22:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-05 22:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-05 06:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-05 06:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-04 13:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-04 13:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-02 20:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-02 20:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-01 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-01 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-05-31 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-05-31 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-05-29 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-05-28 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-05-28 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-05-27 13:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-05-26 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-05-26 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-05-26 07:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-05-26 07:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-05-24 16:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-05-23 06:36 UTCEG score recompute
  71. 2026-05-23 06:36 UTCGHSA enrichment

Related CVEs(same CWE)

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2020-1685?
CVE-2020-1685 is a medium vulnerability published on October 16, 2020. When configuring stateless firewall filters in Juniper Networks EX4600 and QFX 5000 Series devices using Virtual Extensible LAN protocol (VXLAN), the discard action will fail to discard traffic under certain conditions. Given a firewall filter configuration similar to: family ethernet-switching {…
When was CVE-2020-1685 disclosed?
CVE-2020-1685 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on October 16, 2020, with the most recent update on November 21, 2024. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2020-1685 actively exploited?
CVE-2020-1685 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 51.4% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2020-1685?
CVE-2020-1685 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2020-1685?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2020-1685, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2020-1685

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2020-1685?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.

Start Free Scan →Browse All CVEs