CVE-2020-1631

CRITICALNVD 8.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“▲” beside the score: it is higher than NVD's CVSS score.

Score elevated to 9.8 because this CVE is listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2022-03-25), indicating real-world exploitation has been confirmed by US federal agencies. NVD baseline CVSS 8.8 retained for reference. Confidence: HIGH.

Triggered by: CISA KEV (actively exploited)
Sources: CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 3 sources updated this weekExploited in the wild

Also known asEUVD-2020-12499 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-g762-xhjq-x42p (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPatch nowTreat as an emergency — this is being exploited.
  • Actively exploited in the wild (CISA-KEV) — the reason this is sooner than the SSVC decision on this page at low or medium mission impact
CISA-KEV: ExploitedEPSS PROB: 4.9%CVSS: 8.8Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

The following software releases have been updated to resolve this specific issue: 12.3R12-S16, 12.3X48-D101, 12.3X48-D105, 14.1X53-D54, 15.1X49-D211, 15.1X49-D220, 15.1R7-S7, 16.1R7-S8, 17.2R3-S4, 17.4R2-S11, 17.3R3-S8,… (from the CVE record's solution, Juniper Networks, Inc.) — apply it.

A vulnerability in the HTTP/HTTPS service used by J-Web, Web Authentication, Dynamic-VPN (DVPN), Firewall Authentication Pass-Through with Web-Redirect, and Zero Touch Provisioning (ZTP) allows an unauthenticated attacker to perform local file inclusion (LFI) or path traversal. Using this vulnerability, an attacker may be able to inject commands into the httpd.log, read files with 'world' readable permission file or obtain J-Web session tokens. In the case of command injection, as the HTTP service runs as user 'nobody', the impact of this command injection is limited. (CVSS score 5.3, vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N) In the case of reading files with 'world' readable permission, in Junos OS 19.3R1 and above, the unauthenticated attacker would be able to read the configuration file. (CVSS score 5.9, vector CVSS:3.1/ AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N) If J-Web is enabled, the attacker could gain the same level of access of anyone actively logged into J-Web. If an administrator is logged in, the attacker could gain administrator access to J-Web. (CVSS score 8.8, vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) This issue only affects Juniper Networks Junos OS devices with HTTP/HTTPS services enabled. Junos OS devices with HTTP/HTTPS services disabled are not affected. If HTTP/HTTPS services are enabled, the following command will show the httpd processes: user@device> show system processes | match http 5260 - S 0:00.13 /usr/sbin/httpd-gk -N 5797 - I 0:00.10 /usr/sbin/httpd --config /jail/var/etc/httpd.conf To summarize: If HTTP/HTTPS services are disabled, there is no impact from this vulnerability. If HTTP/HTTPS services are enabled and J-Web is not in use, this vulnerability has a CVSS score of 5.9 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N). If J-Web is enabled, this vulnerability has a CVSS score of 8.8 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). Juniper SIRT has received a single report of this vulnerability being exploited in the wild. Out of an abundance of caution, we are notifying customers so they can take appropriate actions. Indicators of Compromise: The /var/log/httpd.log may have indicators that commands have injected or files being accessed. The device administrator can look for these indicators by searching for the string patterns "=*;*&" or "*%3b*&" in /var/log/httpd.log, using the following command: user@device> show log httpd.log | match "=*;*&|=*%3b*&" If this command returns any output, it might be an indication of malicious attempts or simply scanning activities. Rotated logs should also be reviewed, using the following command: user@device> show log httpd.log.0.gz | match "=*;*&|=*%3b*&" user@device> show log httpd.log.1.gz | match "=*;*&|=*%3b*&" Note that a skilled attacker would likely remove these entries from the local log file, thus effectively eliminating any reliable signature that the device had been attacked. This issue affects Juniper Networks Junos OS 12.3 versions prior to 12.3R12-S16; 12.3X48 versions prior to 12.3X48-D101, 12.3X48-D105; 14.1X53 versions prior to 14.1X53-D54; 15.1 versions prior to 15.1R7-S7; 15.1X49 versions prior to 15.1X49-D211, 15.1X49-D220; 16.1 versions prior to 16.1R7-S8; 17.2 versions prior to 17.2R3-S4; 17.3 versions prior to 17.3R3-S8; 17.4 versions prior to 17.4R2-S11, 17.4R3-S2; 18.1 versions prior to 18.1R3-S10; 18.2 versions prior to 18.2R2-S7, 18.2R3-S4; 18.3 versions prior to 18.3R2-S4, 18.3R3-S2; 18.4 versions prior to 18.4R1-S7, 18.4R3-S2 ; 18.4 version 18.4R2 and later versions; 19.1 versions prior to 19.1R1-S5, 19.1R3-S1; 19.1 version 19.1R2 and later versions; 19.2 versions prior to 19.2R2; 19.3 versions prior to 19.3R2-S3, 19.3R3; 19.4 versions prior to 19.4R1-S2, 19.4R2; 20.1 versions prior to 20.1R1-S1, 20.1R2.

CVSS v3
8.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALhigh confidence
EG Risk
84
EG Risk 84/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation100% × 40%
Fixed at 100% for a CISA KEV listing: EchelonGraph's rule.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Attend at medium and Act at high mission impact.
Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: The following software releases have been updated to resolve this specific issue: 12.3R12-S16, 12.3X48-D101, 12.3X48-D105, 14.1X53-D54, 15.1X49-D211, 15.1X49-D220, 15.1R7-S7, 16.1R7-S8, 17.2R3-S4, 17.4R2-S11, 17.3R3-S8,… (from the CVE record's solution, Juniper Networks, Inc.). Apply it within your standard update timelines at low, sooner than that at medium and as soon as possible at high mission impact.
EPSS PROB
4.9%
EPSS %ILE
92nd
KEV
⚠ Exploited

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
4.9% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
CISA KEV and EG-KEV Tier 1 (exploited in the wild)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Attend at medium mission impactTrack at low, Attend at medium and Act at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Attend at medium and Act at high mission impact.

The following software releases have been updated to resolve this specific issue: 12.3R12-S16, 12.3X48-D101, 12.3X48-D105, 14.1X53-D54, 15.1X49-D211, 15.1X49-D220, 15.1R7-S7, 16.1R7-S8, 17.2R3-S4, 17.4R2-S11, 17.3R3-S8,… (from the CVE record's solution, Juniper Networks, Inc.). Apply it within your standard update timelines at low, sooner than that at medium and as soon as possible at high mission impact.

Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV yes (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

CISA required action“Apply updates per vendor instructions.”

Quoted verbatim from CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. CISA directs it at US federal civilian executive branch agencies under Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 26-04, which replaced BOD 22-01 on 10 June 2026; it is not EchelonGraph's advice. CISA's notes: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-1631

Published

May 4, 2020

Last Modified

October 24, 2025

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Oct 26, 2026
⚠️ Actively exploited (CISA KEV, CISA Vulnrichment). Fix named in the CVE record's solution (Juniper Networks, Inc.). Sources: cisa.
CISA🔴 Active Exploitation

Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog | CISA

Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog | CISA. Listed in CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.

https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2020-1631
Web page

CEC Juniper Community

https://kb.juniper.net/JSA11021

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 20× in last 7d / 130× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 1,079 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 979 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-02 02:54 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-11-02 02:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g762-xhjq-x42p · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  3. 2026-11-01 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.9% · 92nd percentile
  4. 2026-11-01 00:36 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-11-01 00:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g762-xhjq-x42p · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  6. 2026-10-31 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.9% · 92nd percentile
  7. 2026-10-30 22:19 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-30 22:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g762-xhjq-x42p · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  9. 2026-10-30 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.9% · 92nd percentile
  10. 2026-10-29 20:03 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-29 20:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g762-xhjq-x42p · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  12. 2026-10-29 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.9% · 92nd percentile
  13. 2026-10-28 17:46 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-28 17:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g762-xhjq-x42p · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  15. 2026-10-28 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.9% · 92nd percentile
  16. 2026-10-27 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.9% · 91st percentile
  17. 2026-10-27 15:30 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-27 15:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g762-xhjq-x42p · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  19. 2026-10-26 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.9% · 91st percentile
  20. 2026-10-26 13:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g762-xhjq-x42p · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  21. 2026-10-25 18:49 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-25 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.9% · 91st percentile
  23. 2026-10-25 10:53 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-25 10:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g762-xhjq-x42p · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  25. 2026-10-24 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.9% · 92nd percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-24 08:36 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-24 08:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g762-xhjq-x42p · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  3. 2026-10-23 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.9% · 92nd percentile
  4. 2026-10-23 06:19 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-23 06:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g762-xhjq-x42p · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  6. 2026-10-22 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.9% · 92nd percentile
  7. 2026-10-22 04:02 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-22 04:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g762-xhjq-x42p · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  9. 2026-10-21 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.9% · 91st percentile
  10. 2026-10-21 01:43 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-21 01:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g762-xhjq-x42p · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  12. 2026-10-20 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.9% · 91st percentile
  13. 2026-10-19 23:27 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-19 23:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g762-xhjq-x42p · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  15. 2026-10-19 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.9% · 91st percentile
  16. 2026-10-18 21:10 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-18 21:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g762-xhjq-x42p · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  18. 2026-10-18 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.9% · 91st percentile
  19. 2026-10-18 09:32 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-17 18:53 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-17 18:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g762-xhjq-x42p · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  22. 2026-10-17 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.8% · 91st percentile
  23. 2026-10-16 16:35 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-16 16:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g762-xhjq-x42p · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  25. 2026-10-16 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.8% · 91st percentile
  26. 2026-10-15 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.8% · 91st percentile
  27. 2026-10-15 14:11 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-10-15 14:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g762-xhjq-x42p · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  29. 2026-10-14 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.8% · 91st percentile
  30. 2026-10-14 11:51 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-10-14 11:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g762-xhjq-x42p · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  32. 2026-10-13 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.8% · 91st percentile
  33. 2026-10-13 09:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g762-xhjq-x42p · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  34. 2026-10-12 19:44 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-10-12 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.8% · 91st percentile
  36. 2026-10-12 07:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g762-xhjq-x42p · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  37. 2026-10-12 02:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g762-xhjq-x42p · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  38. 2026-10-11 22:23 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-10-11 22:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g762-xhjq-x42p · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  40. 2026-10-11 17:59 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-10-11 17:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g762-xhjq-x42p · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  42. 2026-10-11 13:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.8% · 91st percentile
  43. 2026-10-11 13:34 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-10-11 13:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g762-xhjq-x42p · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  45. 2026-10-11 09:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g762-xhjq-x42p · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  46. 2026-10-11 04:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g762-xhjq-x42p · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  47. 2026-10-11 00:16 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-10-11 00:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g762-xhjq-x42p · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  49. 2026-10-10 19:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.8% · 91st percentile
  50. 2026-10-10 19:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g762-xhjq-x42p · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  51. 2026-10-10 15:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g762-xhjq-x42p · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  52. 2026-10-10 11:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g762-xhjq-x42p · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  53. 2026-10-10 06:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g762-xhjq-x42p · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  54. 2026-10-10 02:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g762-xhjq-x42p · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  55. 2026-10-09 21:48 UTCEG score recompute
  56. 2026-10-09 21:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g762-xhjq-x42p · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  57. 2026-10-09 20:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.8% · 91st percentile
  58. 2026-10-09 17:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g762-xhjq-x42p · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  59. 2026-10-09 12:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g762-xhjq-x42p · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  60. 2026-10-09 08:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g762-xhjq-x42p · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  61. 2026-10-09 04:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g762-xhjq-x42p · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  62. 2026-10-08 23:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g762-xhjq-x42p · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  63. 2026-10-08 19:16 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-10-08 19:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g762-xhjq-x42p · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  65. 2026-10-08 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.8% · 91st percentile
  66. 2026-10-08 14:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g762-xhjq-x42p · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  67. 2026-10-08 10:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g762-xhjq-x42p · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  68. 2026-10-08 05:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g762-xhjq-x42p · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  69. 2026-10-08 01:33 UTCEG score recompute
  70. 2026-10-08 01:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g762-xhjq-x42p · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  71. 2026-10-07 23:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.8% · 91st percentile
  72. 2026-10-07 21:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g762-xhjq-x42p · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  73. 2026-10-07 16:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g762-xhjq-x42p · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  74. 2026-10-07 12:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g762-xhjq-x42p · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  75. 2026-10-07 07:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g762-xhjq-x42p · GitHub CVSS 9.8

Related CVEs(same CWE)

Frequently asked(6)

What is CVE-2020-1631?
CVE-2020-1631 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on May 4, 2020. A vulnerability in the HTTP/HTTPS service used by J-Web, Web Authentication, Dynamic-VPN (DVPN), Firewall Authentication Pass-Through with Web-Redirect, and Zero Touch Provisioning (ZTP) allows an unauthenticated attacker to perform local file inclusion (LFI) or path traversal. Using this…
When was CVE-2020-1631 made public?
CVE-2020-1631 was made public on April 27, 2020: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, Juniper Networks, Inc., gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on May 4, 2020. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 24, 2025; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2020-1631 actively exploited?
Yes. CISA added CVE-2020-1631 to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on March 25, 2022, affecting Juniper Junos OS. KEV listing indicates confirmed exploitation in the wild; this CVE warrants immediate attention. The following software releases have been updated to resolve this specific issue: 12.3R12-S16, 12.3X48-D101, 12.3X48-D105, 14.1X53-D54, 15.1X49-D211, 15.1X49-D220, 15.1R7-S7, 16.1R7-S8, 17.2R3-S4, 17.4R2-S11, 17.3R3-S8,… (from the CVE record's solution, Juniper Networks, Inc.). Apply it.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2020-1631?
CVE-2020-1631 has a CVSS v3 base score of 8.8 (NVD). EchelonGraph synthesises NVD + CISA KEV + FIRST EPSS + GHSA into a combined EG score of 9.8 (CRITICAL).
Which products are affected by CVE-2020-1631?
CVE-2020-1631 affects Juniper Junos OS.
How do I remediate CVE-2020-1631?
The CVE record's solution for CVE-2020-1631, written by its CNA Juniper Networks, Inc., names the fix: "The following software releases have been updated to resolve this specific issue: 12.3R12-S16, 12.3X48-D101, 12.3X48-D105, 14.1X53-D54, 15.1X49-D211, 15.1X49-D220, 15.1R7-S7, 16.1R7-S8, 17.2R3-S4, 17.4R2-S11, 17.3R3-S8,…"

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2020-1631

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2020-1631?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.

Book a Demo →Browse All CVEs