CVE-2020-15180

CRITICALNVD 9.09.0
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

This critical-severity CVE scores 9.0 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 5.5% (92nd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from NVD CVSS v3
Sources: EPSS, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 3 sources updated this week

Also known asEUVD-2020-7248 (ENISA EUVD)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.0EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 5.5%CVSS: 9.0Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

A flaw was found in the mysql-wsrep component of mariadb. Lack of input sanitization in wsrep_sst_method allows for command injection that can be exploited by a remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands on galera cluster nodes. This threatens the system's confidentiality, integrity, and availability. This flaw affects mariadb versions before 10.1.47, before 10.2.34, before 10.3.25, before 10.4.15 and before 10.5.6.

CVSS v3
9.0
EG Score
9.0CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
43
EG Risk 43/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity90% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.0 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation5.5% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
5.5%
EPSS %ILE
92nd
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.0 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.0 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
5.5% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

May 27, 2021

Last Modified

November 21, 2024

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Jul 24, 2026
Patch available. Sources: redhat.
Web page

CVE-2020-15180 - Affects Percona XtraDB Cluster - Percona

https://www.percona.com/blog/2020/10/30/cve-2020-15180-affects-percona-xtradb-cluster/
Web page

[SECURITY] [DSA 4776-1] mariadb-10.3 security update

https://www.debian.org/security/2020/dsa-4776
Web page

MariaDB: Remote code execution (GLSA 202011-14) — Gentoo security

https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202011-14
Web pageMentions a patch (unverified)

[SECURITY] [DLA 2409-1] mariadb-10.1 security update

https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/10/msg00021.html
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)

1894919 – (CVE-2020-15180) CVE-2020-15180 mariadb: Insufficient SST method name check leading to code injection in mysql-wsrep

Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1894919

Patch Availability(7)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntumariadb-test-data (1:10.3.25-0ubuntu0.20.04.1) @ focal2026-11-01ubuntu
redhatmariadb:10.3-8000020201221114409.f8e95b4e2020-12-22redhat
redhatmariadb:10.3-8020020201214133105.4cda2c842020-12-22redhat
redhatmariadb:10.3-8010020201214133427.c27ad7f82020-12-22redhat
redhatmariadb:10.3-8030020201203011231.229f0a1c2020-12-15redhat
redhatmariadb-galera-1:5.5.62-2.el7ost2020-12-08redhat
redhatrh-mariadb103-mariadb-3:10.3.27-1.el72020-11-30redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(19 across 19 ecosystems)
Alpine:v3.10(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
mariadb—
  • 10.1.0 up to 10.3.25-r0: fixed in 10.3.25-r0
—
Alpine:v3.11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
mariadb—
  • 10.1.0 up to 10.4.15-r0: fixed in 10.4.15-r0
—
Alpine:v3.12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
mariadb—
  • 10.1.0 up to 10.4.15-r0: fixed in 10.4.15-r0
—
Alpine:v3.13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
mariadb—
  • 10.1.0 up to 10.5.6-r0: fixed in 10.5.6-r0
—
Alpine:v3.14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
mariadb—
  • 10.1.0 up to 10.5.6-r0: fixed in 10.5.6-r0
—
Alpine:v3.15(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
mariadb—
  • 10.1.0 up to 10.5.6-r0: fixed in 10.5.6-r0
—
Alpine:v3.16(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
mariadb—
  • 10.1.0 up to 10.5.6-r0: fixed in 10.5.6-r0
—
Alpine:v3.17(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
mariadb—
  • 10.1.0 up to 10.5.6-r0: fixed in 10.5.6-r0
—
Alpine:v3.18(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
mariadb—
  • 10.1.0 up to 10.5.6-r0: fixed in 10.5.6-r0
—
Alpine:v3.19(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
mariadb—
  • 10.1.0 up to 10.5.6-r0: fixed in 10.5.6-r0
—
Alpine:v3.20(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
mariadb—
  • 10.1.0 up to 10.5.6-r0: fixed in 10.5.6-r0
—
Alpine:v3.21(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
mariadb—
  • 10.1.0 up to 10.5.6-r0: fixed in 10.5.6-r0
—
Alpine:v3.22(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
mariadb—
  • 10.1.0 up to 10.5.6-r0: fixed in 10.5.6-r0
—
Alpine:v3.23(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
mariadb—
  • 10.1.0 up to 10.5.6-r0: fixed in 10.5.6-r0
—
Alpine:v3.24(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
mariadb—
  • 10.1.0 up to 10.5.6-r0: fixed in 10.5.6-r0
—
Alpine:v3.9(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
mariadb—
  • 10.1.0 up to 10.3.25-r0: fixed in 10.3.25-r0
—
Debian:10(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
mariadb-10.31:10.3.15-1 ... 1:10.3.24-2 (18 versions)
  • every version up to 1:10.3.25-0+deb10u1: fixed in 1:10.3.25-0+deb10u1
—
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
mariadb-10.5—
  • every version up to 1:10.5.6-1: fixed in 1:10.5.6-1
—
Debian:9(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
mariadb-10.110.1.23-9+deb9u1 ... 10.1.45-0+deb9u1 (18 versions)
  • every version up to 10.1.47-0+deb9u1: fixed in 10.1.47-0+deb9u1
—

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(2)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 21× in last 7d / 74× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 97 of 231 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 3 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 134 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-01 20:42 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-11-01 20:42 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-01 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.5% · 92nd percentile
  4. 2026-10-31 22:48 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-31 22:48 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-31 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.5% · 92nd percentile
  7. 2026-10-31 00:52 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-31 00:52 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-10-30 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.5% · 92nd percentile
  10. 2026-10-30 02:57 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-30 02:57 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-10-29 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.5% · 92nd percentile
  13. 2026-10-29 05:02 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-29 05:02 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-28 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.5% · 92nd percentile
  16. 2026-10-28 07:08 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-28 07:08 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-27 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.5% · 92nd percentile
  19. 2026-10-27 09:11 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-27 09:11 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-26 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.5% · 92nd percentile
  22. 2026-10-26 10:33 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-25 18:50 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-25 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.5% · 92nd percentile
  25. 2026-10-25 12:37 UTCEG score recompute
Show 72 more
  1. 2026-10-25 12:37 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-10-24 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.5% · 92nd percentile
  3. 2026-10-24 14:39 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-10-23 16:44 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-23 16:44 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-23 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.5% · 92nd percentile
  7. 2026-10-22 18:45 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-22 18:45 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-10-22 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.5% · 92nd percentile
  10. 2026-10-21 20:50 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-21 20:50 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-10-21 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.5% · 92nd percentile
  13. 2026-10-20 22:51 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-20 22:51 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-20 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.5% · 92nd percentile
  16. 2026-10-20 00:33 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-20 00:33 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-19 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.5% · 92nd percentile
  19. 2026-10-18 23:27 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-18 23:27 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-18 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.5% · 92nd percentile
  22. 2026-10-18 09:33 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-18 01:29 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-18 01:29 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-10-17 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.5% · 92nd percentile
  26. 2026-10-17 03:03 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-10-17 03:03 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-10-16 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.5% · 92nd percentile
  29. 2026-10-16 05:05 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-10-16 05:05 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-10-15 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.5% · 92nd percentile
  32. 2026-10-15 03:31 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-10-15 03:31 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-10-14 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.5% · 92nd percentile
  35. 2026-10-13 23:41 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-10-13 23:41 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-10-13 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.5% · 92nd percentile
  38. 2026-10-12 19:46 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-10-12 19:45 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-10-12 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.5% · 92nd percentile
  41. 2026-10-12 00:08 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-10-11 13:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.5% · 92nd percentile
  43. 2026-10-10 19:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.5% · 92nd percentile
  44. 2026-10-09 20:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.5% · 92nd percentile
  45. 2026-10-08 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.5% · 92nd percentile
  46. 2026-10-07 23:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.5% · 92nd percentile
  47. 2026-10-06 15:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.5% · 92nd percentile
  48. 2026-10-05 17:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.5% · 92nd percentile
  49. 2026-10-03 14:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.5% · 92nd percentile
  50. 2026-10-02 16:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.5% · 92nd percentile
  51. 2026-09-30 15:12 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-09-30 14:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.5% · 92nd percentile
  53. 2026-09-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.5% · 92nd percentile
  54. 2026-09-26 15:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.5% · 92nd percentile
  55. 2026-09-26 01:15 UTCOSV refresh
  56. 2026-09-26 00:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.5% · 92nd percentile
  57. 2026-09-24 14:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.5% · 92nd percentile
  58. 2026-09-22 14:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.5% · 92nd percentile
  59. 2026-09-21 20:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.5% · 92nd percentile
  60. 2026-09-20 20:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.5% · 92nd percentile
  61. 2026-09-18 19:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.5% · 92nd percentile
  62. 2026-09-17 19:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.5% · 92nd percentile
  63. 2026-09-16 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.5% · 92nd percentile
  64. 2026-09-15 03:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.5% · 92nd percentile
  65. 2026-09-13 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.5% · 92nd percentile
  66. 2026-09-12 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.5% · 92nd percentile
  67. 2026-09-11 14:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.5% · 92nd percentile
  68. 2026-09-11 09:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.5% · 92nd percentile
  69. 2026-09-10 09:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.5% · 92nd percentile
  70. 2026-09-08 21:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.5% · 92nd percentile
  71. 2026-09-07 15:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.5% · 92nd percentile
  72. 2026-09-06 16:31 UTCOSV refresh

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2020-15180?
CVE-2020-15180 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on May 27, 2021. A flaw was found in the mysql-wsrep component of mariadb. Lack of input sanitization in wsrep_sst_method allows for command injection that can be exploited by a remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands on galera cluster nodes. This threatens the system's confidentiality, integrity, and…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2020-15180 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2020-15180 was published on May 27, 2021. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 21, 2024; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2020-15180 actively exploited?
CVE-2020-15180 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 5.5% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (92nd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2020-15180?
CVE-2020-15180 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.0 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2020-15180?
A fix for CVE-2020-15180 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2020-15180 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2020-15180

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2020-15180?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.