An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when an attacker establishes a vulnerable Netlogon secure channel connection to a domain controller, using the Netlogon Remote Protocol (MS-NRPC). An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could run a specially crafted application on a device on the network. To exploit the vulnerability, an unauthenticated attacker would be required to use MS-NRPC to connect to a domain controller to obtain domain administrator access. Microsoft is addressing the vulnerability in a phased two-part rollout. These updates address the vulnerability by modifying how Netlogon handles the usage of Netlogon secure channels. For guidelines on how to manage the changes required for this vulnerability and more information on the phased rollout, see How to manage the changes in Netlogon secure channel connections associated with CVE-2020-1472 (updated September 28, 2020). When the second phase of Windows updates become available in Q1 2021, customers will be notified via a revision to this security vulnerability. If you wish to be notified when these updates are released, we recommend that you register for the security notifications mailer to be alerted of content changes to this advisory. See Microsoft Technical Security Notifications.
CVE-2020-1472
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
Score elevated to 10.0 because this CVE is listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2021-11-03), indicating real-world exploitation has been confirmed by US federal agencies. It is also listed on ENISA's EU Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogue (Source: ENISA EUVD). NVD baseline CVSS 10.0 retained for reference. Confidence: HIGH.
Also known asEUVD-2020-12346 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-gc5h-xf3g-h5x4 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- Actively exploited in the wild (CISA-KEV) — the reason this is sooner than the SSVC decision on this page at low mission impact
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 10.0
- EG Score
- 10.0CRITICALhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 100EG Risk 100/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity100% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 10.0 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation100% × 40%Fixed at 100% for a CISA KEV listing: EchelonGraph's rule.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Attend at low mission impact; Act at medium or high.Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it sooner than your standard update timelines at low mission impact and as soon as possible at medium or high. - EPSS PROB
- 99%
- EPSS %ILE
- 99th
- KEV
- ⚠ Exploited
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (10.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 10.0 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 10.0 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 99% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-02). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- CISA KEV and ENISA EU KEV (Source: ENISA EUVD) and EG-KEV Tier 1 (exploited in the wild)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Act at medium mission impactAttend at low mission impact; Act at medium or high.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 3 days & forensic triage if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
ENISA EU KEV: listed January 23, 2025, reported by cnw.
Source: ENISA EUVD (EU Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogue), reproduced with acknowledgement. How a listing moves the EG score
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Attend at low mission impact; Act at medium or high.
A fix is available. Apply it sooner than your standard update timelines at low mission impact and as soon as possible at medium or high.
Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 3 days & forensic triage if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV yes (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
CISA required action“Apply updates per vendor instructions.”
Quoted verbatim from CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. CISA directs it at US federal civilian executive branch agencies under Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 26-04, which replaced BOD 22-01 on 10 June 2026; it is not EchelonGraph's advice. CISA's notes: https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/directives/ed-20-04-mitigate-netlogon-elevation-privilege-vulnerability-august-2020-patch-tuesday · https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-1472
Published
August 17, 2020
Last Modified
June 17, 2026
Advisory Details (8)
Auto-updated Oct 29, 2026Security Update Guide - Microsoft Security Response Center
https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1472[SECURITY] Fedora 33 Update: samba-4.13.0-11.fc33 - package-announce - Fedora mailing-lists
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/TAPQQZZAT4TG3XVRTAFV2Y3S7OAHFBUP/[SECURITY] Fedora 31 Update: samba-4.11.13-0.fc31 - package-announce - Fedora mailing-lists
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ST6X3A2XXYMGD4INR26DQ4FP4QSM753B/[SECURITY] Fedora 32 Update: samba-4.12.7-0.fc32 - package-announce - Fedora mailing-lists
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/H4OTFBL6YDVFH2TBJFJIE4FMHPJEEJK3/[SECURITY] [DLA 2463-1] samba security update
https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/11/msg00041.htmloss-security - Samba and CVE-2020-1472 ("Zerologon")
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2020/09/17/2Vendor Advisories for CVE-2020-1472(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Patch Availability(7)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ubuntu | winbind (2:4.3.11+dfsg-0ubuntu0.16.04.30) @ xenial | 2026-11-03 | ubuntu |
| ubuntu | libpam-smbpass (2:4.3.11+dfsg-0ubuntu0.14.04.20+esm9) @ trusty | 2026-11-03 | ubuntu |
| ubuntu | winbind (2:4.11.6+dfsg-0ubuntu1.5) @ focal | 2026-11-03 | ubuntu |
| redhat | samba-0:4.11.6-112.el7rhgs | 2021-10-05 | redhat |
| redhat | samba-0:4.13.3-3.el8 | 2021-05-18 | redhat |
| redhat | samba-0:4.13.7-101.el8rhgs | 2021-05-05 | redhat |
| redhat | samba-0:4.10.16-9.el7_9 | 2020-12-15 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(20 across 20 ecosystems)
Alpine:v3.10(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| samba | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| samba | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| samba | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| samba | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| samba | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.15(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| samba | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.16(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| samba | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.17(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| samba | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.18(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| samba | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.19(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| samba | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.20(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| samba | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.21(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| samba | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.22(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| samba | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.23(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| samba | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.24(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| samba | — |
| — |
Debian:11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| samba | — |
| — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| samba | — |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| samba | — |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| samba | — |
| — |
Debian:9(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| samba | 2:4.5.12+dfsg-1 ... 2:4.5.8+dfsg-2+deb9u2 (12 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Additional Vendor Advisories
(7)
Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.
- Red HatRHBA-2021:1503CRITICAL2020-09-11
RHBA-2021:1503 — Critical
- Red HatRHSA-2020:5439CRITICAL2020-09-11
RHSA-2020:5439 — Critical
- Red HatRHSA-2021:1647CRITICAL2020-09-11
RHSA-2021:1647 — Critical
- Red HatRHSA-2021:3723CRITICAL2020-09-11
RHSA-2021:3723 — Critical
- UbuntuUSN-4510-1MEDIUM
Samba vulnerability
- UbuntuUSN-4510-2MEDIUM
Samba vulnerability
- UbuntuUSN-4559-1MEDIUM
Samba update
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 24× in last 7d / 181× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 1,817 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 1,717 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-11-03 01:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-03 01:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-11-03 01:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gc5h-xf3g-h5x4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-11-02 02:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-02 02:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-11-02 02:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gc5h-xf3g-h5x4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-11-01 04:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-01 04:19 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-11-01 04:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gc5h-xf3g-h5x4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-31 05:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 05:39 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-31 05:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gc5h-xf3g-h5x4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-30 07:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-30 07:01 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-30 07:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gc5h-xf3g-h5x4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-29 08:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-29 08:23 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-29 08:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gc5h-xf3g-h5x4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-28 09:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-28 09:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-28 09:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gc5h-xf3g-h5x4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-27 11:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-27 11:04 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-27 11:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gc5h-xf3g-h5x4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-26 12:26 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-26 12:26 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-26 12:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gc5h-xf3g-h5x4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-25 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 99% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-25 13:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 13:47 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-25 13:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gc5h-xf3g-h5x4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-25 13:46 UTCENISA EU KEV listingEUVD-2020-12346 · listed January 23, 2025 · reported by cnw · Source: ENISA EUVD
- 2026-10-25 11:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 11:02 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-25 11:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gc5h-xf3g-h5x4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-24 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 99% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-24 12:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 12:23 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-24 12:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gc5h-xf3g-h5x4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-23 13:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-23 13:44 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-23 13:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gc5h-xf3g-h5x4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-22 15:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 15:02 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-22 15:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gc5h-xf3g-h5x4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-21 16:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-21 16:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gc5h-xf3g-h5x4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-20 17:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-20 17:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-20 17:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gc5h-xf3g-h5x4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-19 19:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 19:02 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-19 19:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gc5h-xf3g-h5x4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-18 20:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-18 20:22 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-18 20:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gc5h-xf3g-h5x4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-18 09:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 21:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 21:44 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-17 21:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gc5h-xf3g-h5x4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-16 23:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 23:05 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-16 23:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gc5h-xf3g-h5x4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-16 00:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 00:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-16 00:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gc5h-xf3g-h5x4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-15 01:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 01:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-15 01:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gc5h-xf3g-h5x4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-14 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 99% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-14 03:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 03:07 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-14 03:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gc5h-xf3g-h5x4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-13 04:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-13 04:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gc5h-xf3g-h5x4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-12 19:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 05:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-12 05:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gc5h-xf3g-h5x4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-12 01:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-12 01:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gc5h-xf3g-h5x4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-11 22:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 22:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 22:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gc5h-xf3g-h5x4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-11 18:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 18:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 18:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gc5h-xf3g-h5x4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-11 14:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 14:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gc5h-xf3g-h5x4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-11 10:39 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 10:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gc5h-xf3g-h5x4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-11 06:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 06:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gc5h-xf3g-h5x4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-11 03:01 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 03:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gc5h-xf3g-h5x4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-10 23:12 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 23:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gc5h-xf3g-h5x4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-10 19:23 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 19:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gc5h-xf3g-h5x4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-10 15:35 UTCVendor advisory
Publicly available exploits
(13 references, 10 shown)Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 Metasploit module, 1 Exploit-DB entry, 11 GitHub PoCs). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.
- Metasploitauxiliary/admin/dcerpc/cve_2020_1472_zerologon✓ verifiedPublished Sep 22, 2020
Netlogon protocol vulnerability allowing domain takeover with no credentials.
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCSecuraBV/CVE-2020-1472✓ verifiedPublished Sep 14, 2020
Original Secura PoC — minimal, reads the white-paper detection script.
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCRvn0xsy/ZeroLogonPublished Aug 31, 2022
CVE-2020-1472 C++
Open source ↗ - Exploit-DBEDB-49071Published Nov 18, 2020
ZeroLogon - Netlogon Elevation of Privilege
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCzeronetworks/zerologonPublished Sep 17, 2020
Test script for CVE-2020-1472 for both RPC/TCP and RPC/SMB
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCmstxq17/cve-2020-1472Published Sep 16, 2020
cve-2020-1472 复现利用及其exp
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCk8gege/CVE-2020-1472-EXPPublished Sep 15, 2020
Ladon Moudle CVE-2020-1472 Exploit 域控提权神器
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCbb00/zer0dumpPublished Sep 14, 2020
Abuse CVE-2020-1472 (Zerologon) to take over a domain and then repair the local stored machine account password.
Open source ↗ - Open source ↗GitHub PoCcube0x0/CVE-2020-1472Published Sep 14, 2020
- GitHub PoCdirkjanm/CVE-2020-1472Published Sep 14, 2020
PoC for Zerologon - all research credits go to Tom Tervoort of Secura
Open source ↗
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownDebian:9:samba
- CVE-2017-14746EG 9.8EPSS p96CRITICAL
- CVE-2018-10858NVD 4.3EG 8.8EPSS p91HIGH
- CVE-2018-1057EG 8.8EPSS p96HIGH
- CVE-2020-10745EG 7.5EPSS p90HIGH
- CVE-2020-14303EG 7.5HIGH
- CVE-2020-10704EG 7.5HIGH
- CVE-2018-16860EG 7.5HIGH
- CVE-2017-15275EG 7.5EPSS p98HIGH
- CVE-2017-12151EG 7.4EPSS p91HIGH
- CVE-2017-12150EG 7.4EPSS p96HIGH
Same vendor
3 shownredhat:RHBA-2021:1503 · redhat:RHSA-2021:3723
Frequently asked(6)
What is CVE-2020-1472?
When was CVE-2020-1472 made public?
Is CVE-2020-1472 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2020-1472?
Which products are affected by CVE-2020-1472?
How do I remediate CVE-2020-1472?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2020-1472
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2020-1472?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.