CVE-2020-0618

CRITICALNVD 8.89.0
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“▲” beside the score: it is higher than NVD's CVSS score.

Score elevated to 9.0 because this CVE is listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2024-09-18), indicating real-world exploitation has been confirmed by US federal agencies. NVD baseline CVSS 8.8 retained for reference. The 9.0 is the floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: this CVE's impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 8.8 HIGH under GitHub Security Advisory CVSS. Confidence: HIGH.

Triggered by: CISA KEV (actively exploited)
Sources: CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 3 sources updated this weekExploited in the wild

Also known asEUVD-2020-2113 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-jcvj-vhj2-vgmw (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.0EG
EchelonGraph verdictPatch nowTreat as an emergency — this is being exploited.
  • Actively exploited in the wild (CISA-KEV) — the reason this is sooner than the SSVC decision on this page at low or medium mission impact
CISA-KEV: ExploitedEPSS PROB: 99%CVSS: 8.8Exploit: Metasploit · other public PoCExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services when it incorrectly handles page requests, aka 'Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'.

CVSS v3
8.8
EG Score
9.0CRITICALhigh confidence
EG Risk
80
EG Risk 80/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity88% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation100% × 40%
Fixed at 100% for a CISA KEV listing: EchelonGraph's rule.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Attend at medium and Act at high mission impact.
Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low, sooner than that at medium and as soon as possible at high mission impact.
EPSS PROB
99%
EPSS %ILE
99th
KEV
⚠ Exploited

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.0 is the CISA KEV floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: its impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 8.8 HIGH.

EG Severity
8.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
99% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
CISA KEV and EG-KEV Tier 1 (exploited in the wild)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Attend at medium mission impactTrack at low, Attend at medium and Act at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Attend at medium and Act at high mission impact.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low, sooner than that at medium and as soon as possible at high mission impact.

Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV yes (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

CISA required action“Apply mitigations per vendor instructions or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.”

Quoted verbatim from CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. CISA directs it at US federal civilian executive branch agencies under Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 26-04, which replaced BOD 22-01 on 10 June 2026; it is not EchelonGraph's advice. CISA's notes: https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2020-0618 · https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-0618

Published

February 11, 2020

Last Modified

August 15, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Nov 2, 2026
⚠️ Actively exploited (CISA KEV, CISA Vulnrichment). Patch available. Sources: microsoft, cisa.
CISA🔴 Active Exploitation

Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog | CISA

Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog | CISA. Listed in CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.

https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2020-0618
Microsoft

Security Update Guide - Microsoft Security Response Center

https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-0618

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2020-0618(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 20× in last 7d / 167× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 1,629 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 1,529 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-02 10:36 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-11-02 10:36 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-02 10:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jcvj-vhj2-vgmw · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  4. 2026-11-01 12:38 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-11-01 12:38 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-11-01 12:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jcvj-vhj2-vgmw · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  7. 2026-10-31 14:40 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-31 14:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jcvj-vhj2-vgmw · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  9. 2026-10-30 16:41 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-30 16:41 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-30 16:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jcvj-vhj2-vgmw · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  12. 2026-10-29 18:44 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-29 18:44 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-10-29 18:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jcvj-vhj2-vgmw · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  15. 2026-10-28 20:46 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-28 20:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jcvj-vhj2-vgmw · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  17. 2026-10-27 22:46 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-27 22:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jcvj-vhj2-vgmw · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  19. 2026-10-27 00:45 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-27 00:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jcvj-vhj2-vgmw · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  21. 2026-10-26 02:47 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-26 02:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jcvj-vhj2-vgmw · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  23. 2026-10-25 18:54 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-25 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 99% · 99th percentile
  25. 2026-10-25 04:46 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-25 04:46 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-10-25 04:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jcvj-vhj2-vgmw · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  3. 2026-10-24 06:48 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-24 06:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jcvj-vhj2-vgmw · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  5. 2026-10-23 08:49 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-23 08:49 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-10-23 08:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jcvj-vhj2-vgmw · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  8. 2026-10-22 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 99% · 99th percentile
  9. 2026-10-22 10:48 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-22 10:48 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-22 10:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jcvj-vhj2-vgmw · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  12. 2026-10-21 12:46 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-21 12:46 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-10-21 12:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jcvj-vhj2-vgmw · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  15. 2026-10-20 14:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jcvj-vhj2-vgmw · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  16. 2026-10-19 16:49 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-19 16:49 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-19 16:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jcvj-vhj2-vgmw · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  19. 2026-10-18 18:48 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-18 18:48 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-18 18:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jcvj-vhj2-vgmw · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  22. 2026-10-18 09:39 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-17 20:50 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-17 20:50 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-10-17 20:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jcvj-vhj2-vgmw · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  26. 2026-10-16 22:50 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-10-16 22:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jcvj-vhj2-vgmw · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  28. 2026-10-16 00:52 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-10-16 00:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jcvj-vhj2-vgmw · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  30. 2026-10-15 02:53 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-10-15 02:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jcvj-vhj2-vgmw · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  32. 2026-10-14 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 99% · 99th percentile
  33. 2026-10-14 04:52 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-10-14 04:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jcvj-vhj2-vgmw · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  35. 2026-10-13 06:51 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-10-13 06:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jcvj-vhj2-vgmw · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  37. 2026-10-12 19:49 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-10-12 08:52 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-10-12 08:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jcvj-vhj2-vgmw · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  40. 2026-10-12 04:43 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-10-12 04:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jcvj-vhj2-vgmw · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  42. 2026-10-12 00:33 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-10-12 00:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jcvj-vhj2-vgmw · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  44. 2026-10-11 20:22 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-10-11 20:22 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-10-11 20:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jcvj-vhj2-vgmw · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  47. 2026-10-11 16:14 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-10-11 16:14 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-10-11 16:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jcvj-vhj2-vgmw · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  50. 2026-10-11 12:06 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-10-11 12:06 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-10-11 12:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jcvj-vhj2-vgmw · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  53. 2026-10-11 07:58 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-10-11 07:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jcvj-vhj2-vgmw · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  55. 2026-10-11 03:51 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-10-11 03:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jcvj-vhj2-vgmw · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  57. 2026-10-10 23:43 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-10-10 23:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jcvj-vhj2-vgmw · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  59. 2026-10-10 19:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jcvj-vhj2-vgmw · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  60. 2026-10-10 15:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jcvj-vhj2-vgmw · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  61. 2026-10-10 11:21 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-10-10 11:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jcvj-vhj2-vgmw · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  63. 2026-10-10 07:13 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-10-10 07:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jcvj-vhj2-vgmw · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  65. 2026-10-10 03:02 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-10-10 03:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jcvj-vhj2-vgmw · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  67. 2026-10-09 22:54 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-10-09 22:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jcvj-vhj2-vgmw · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  69. 2026-10-09 18:46 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-10-09 18:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jcvj-vhj2-vgmw · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  71. 2026-10-09 14:38 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-10-09 14:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jcvj-vhj2-vgmw · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  73. 2026-10-09 10:27 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-10-09 10:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jcvj-vhj2-vgmw · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  75. 2026-10-09 06:20 UTCVendor advisory

Publicly available exploits

(6 references)

Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 Metasploit module, 1 Exploit-DB entry, 3 GitHub PoCs), as is 1 Nuclei detection template. A detection template checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code. Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.

  • Metasploitexploit/windows/http/ssrs_navcorrector_viewstate✓ verified
    Published Mar 12, 2020

    SQL Server Reporting Services (SSRS) ViewState Deserialization

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCitstarsec/CVE-2020-0618
    Published May 13, 2022

    Melissa

    Open source ↗
  • Nucleihttp/cves/2020/CVE-2020-0618.yaml
    Published Sep 28, 2020

    Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services - Remote Code Execution

    Open source ↗
  • Exploit-DBEDB-48816
    Published Sep 17, 2020

    Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services 2016 - Remote Code Execution

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCwortell/cve-2020-0618
    Published Feb 18, 2020

    CVE-2020-0618 Honeypot

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCeuphrat1ca/CVE-2020-0618
    Published Feb 15, 2020

    SQL Server Reporting Services(CVE-2020-0618)中的RCE

    Open source ↗

Frequently asked(6)

What is CVE-2020-0618?
CVE-2020-0618 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on February 11, 2020. A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services when it incorrectly handles page requests, aka 'Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'.
When was the CVE record for CVE-2020-0618 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2020-0618 was published on February 11, 2020. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of August 15, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2020-0618 actively exploited?
Yes. CISA added CVE-2020-0618 to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on September 18, 2024, affecting Microsoft SQL Server. KEV listing indicates confirmed exploitation in the wild; this CVE warrants immediate attention. A fix is available. Apply it.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2020-0618?
CVE-2020-0618 has a CVSS v3 base score of 8.8 (NVD). EchelonGraph synthesises NVD + CISA KEV + FIRST EPSS + GHSA into a combined EG score of 9.0 (CRITICAL).
Which products are affected by CVE-2020-0618?
CVE-2020-0618 affects Microsoft SQL Server.
How do I remediate CVE-2020-0618?
A fix for CVE-2020-0618 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2020-0618 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2020-0618

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2020-0618?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.