Kibana versions before 5.6.15 and 6.6.1 contain an arbitrary code execution flaw in the Timelion visualizer. An attacker with access to the Timelion application could send a request that will attempt to execute javascript code. This could possibly lead to an attacker executing arbitrary commands with permissions of the Kibana process on the host system.
CVE-2019-7609
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
Score elevated to 10.0 because this CVE is listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2022-01-10), indicating real-world exploitation has been confirmed by US federal agencies. NVD baseline CVSS 10.0 retained for reference. Confidence: HIGH.
Also known asEUVD-2019-17147 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-cp8f-5jp9-rqmh (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- Actively exploited in the wild (CISA-KEV) — the reason this is sooner than the SSVC decision on this page at low mission impact
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 10.0
- EG Score
- 10.0CRITICALhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 100EG Risk 100/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity100% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 10.0 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation100% × 40%Fixed at 100% for a CISA KEV listing: EchelonGraph's rule.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Attend at low mission impact; Act at medium or high.Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it sooner than your standard update timelines at low mission impact and as soon as possible at medium or high. - EPSS PROB
- 95%
- EPSS %ILE
- 99th
- KEV
- ⚠ Exploited
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (10.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 10.0 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 10.0 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 95% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-02). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- CISA KEV and EG-KEV Tier 1 (exploited in the wild)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Act at medium mission impactAttend at low mission impact; Act at medium or high.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 3 days & forensic triage if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Attend at low mission impact; Act at medium or high.
A fix is available. Apply it sooner than your standard update timelines at low mission impact and as soon as possible at medium or high.
Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 3 days & forensic triage if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV yes (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
CISA required action“Apply updates per vendor instructions.”
Quoted verbatim from CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. CISA directs it at US federal civilian executive branch agencies under Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 26-04, which replaced BOD 22-01 on 10 June 2026; it is not EchelonGraph's advice. CISA's notes: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-7609
Published
March 25, 2019
Last Modified
November 7, 2025
Advisory Details (5)
Auto-updated Nov 1, 2026Elastic Stack 6.6.1 and 5.6.15 security update - Security Announcements - Discuss the Elastic Stack
https://discuss.elastic.co/t/elastic-stack-6-6-1-and-5-6-15-security-update/169077Vendor Advisories for CVE-2019-7609(2)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Patch Availability(2)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | kibana-0:5.6.16-2.el7 | 2019-09-30 | redhat |
| redhat | openshift3/snapshot-provisioner:v3.11.146-2 | 2019-09-24 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 23× in last 7d / 171× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 1,628 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 1,528 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-11-02 21:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-02 21:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-11-02 21:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cp8f-5jp9-rqmh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-11-02 00:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-02 00:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-11-02 00:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cp8f-5jp9-rqmh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-11-01 02:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-01 02:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-11-01 02:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cp8f-5jp9-rqmh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-31 04:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 04:56 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-31 04:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cp8f-5jp9-rqmh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-30 07:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-30 07:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-30 07:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cp8f-5jp9-rqmh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-29 09:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-29 09:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-29 09:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cp8f-5jp9-rqmh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-28 11:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-28 11:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-28 11:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cp8f-5jp9-rqmh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-27 14:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-27 14:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cp8f-5jp9-rqmh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-26 16:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-26 16:37 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-26 16:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cp8f-5jp9-rqmh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-25 18:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 18:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-25 18:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cp8f-5jp9-rqmh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-25 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 95% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-24 21:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 21:15 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-24 21:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cp8f-5jp9-rqmh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-23 23:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-23 23:35 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-23 23:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cp8f-5jp9-rqmh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-23 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 95% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-23 01:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-23 01:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-23 01:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cp8f-5jp9-rqmh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-22 04:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 04:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-22 04:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cp8f-5jp9-rqmh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-21 06:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-21 06:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-21 06:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cp8f-5jp9-rqmh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-20 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 95% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-20 08:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-20 08:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-20 08:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cp8f-5jp9-rqmh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-19 11:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 11:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-19 11:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cp8f-5jp9-rqmh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-18 13:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-18 13:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cp8f-5jp9-rqmh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-18 09:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 15:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-17 15:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cp8f-5jp9-rqmh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-16 18:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 18:05 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-16 18:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cp8f-5jp9-rqmh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-15 20:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 20:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-15 20:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cp8f-5jp9-rqmh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-14 22:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 22:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-14 22:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cp8f-5jp9-rqmh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-14 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 95% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-14 01:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 01:02 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-14 01:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cp8f-5jp9-rqmh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-13 03:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-13 03:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cp8f-5jp9-rqmh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-12 19:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 05:39 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-12 05:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cp8f-5jp9-rqmh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-12 01:13 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-12 01:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cp8f-5jp9-rqmh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-11 20:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 20:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 20:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cp8f-5jp9-rqmh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-11 16:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 16:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cp8f-5jp9-rqmh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-11 12:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 12:00 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 12:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cp8f-5jp9-rqmh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-11 07:34 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 07:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cp8f-5jp9-rqmh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-11 03:10 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 03:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cp8f-5jp9-rqmh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-10 22:44 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 22:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cp8f-5jp9-rqmh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-10 18:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 18:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cp8f-5jp9-rqmh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-10 13:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 13:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cp8f-5jp9-rqmh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-10 09:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 09:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cp8f-5jp9-rqmh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-10 05:03 UTCVendor advisory
Publicly available exploits
(7 references)Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 Metasploit module, 5 GitHub PoCs), as is 1 Nuclei detection template. A detection template checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code. Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.
- Metasploitexploit/linux/http/kibana_timelion_prototype_pollution_rce✓ verifiedPublished Sep 8, 2023
Kibana Timelion Prototype Pollution RCE
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCCr4ckC4t/cve-2019-7609Published Mar 17, 2022
Kibana <6.6.0 RCE written in python3
Open source ↗ - Nucleihttp/cves/2019/CVE-2019-7609.yamlPublished Aug 15, 2020
Kibana Timelion - Arbitrary Code Execution
Open source ↗ - Open source ↗GitHub PoChekadan/CVE-2019-7609Published Dec 1, 2019
- GitHub PoCLandGrey/CVE-2019-7609Published Oct 21, 2019
exploit CVE-2019-7609(kibana RCE) on right way by python2 scripts
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCmpgn/CVE-2019-7609Published Oct 21, 2019
RCE on Kibana versions before 5.6.15 and 6.6.0 in the Timelion visualizer
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCjas502n/kibana-RCEPublished Oct 18, 2019
kibana < 6.6.0 未授权远程代码命令执行 (Need Timelion And Canvas),CVE-2019-7609
Open source ↗
Related CVEs(same vendor + same CWE)
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-94
- CVE-2019-7610EG 9.0EPSS p90CRITICAL
- CVE-2019-7539NVD 8.8EG 9.6CRITICAL
- CVE-2019-5413EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2019-9651EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2019-9227EG 9.8EPSS p90CRITICAL
- CVE-2019-9115EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2019-9082NVD 8.8EG 9.0 KEVEPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2019-3493EG 8.8HIGH
- CVE-2019-8341EG 9.8EPSS p99CRITICAL
- CVE-2019-7720EG 9.8CRITICAL
Frequently asked(6)
What is CVE-2019-7609?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2019-7609 published?
Is CVE-2019-7609 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2019-7609?
Which products are affected by CVE-2019-7609?
How do I remediate CVE-2019-7609?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2019-7609
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2019-7609?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.