TeamViewer Desktop through 14.7.1965 allows a bypass of remote-login access control because the same key is used for different customers' installations. It used a shared AES key for all installations since at least as far back as v7.0.43148, and used it for at least OptionsPasswordAES in the current version of the product. If an attacker were to know this key, they could decrypt protect information stored in the registry or configuration files of TeamViewer. With versions before v9.x , this allowed for attackers to decrypt the Unattended Access password to the system (which allows for remote login to the system as well as headless file browsing). The latest version still uses the same key for OptionPasswordAES but appears to have changed how the Unattended Access password is stored. While in most cases an attacker requires an existing session on a system, if the registry/configuration keys were stored off of the machine (such as in a file share or online), an attacker could then decrypt the required password to login to the system.
CVE-2019-18988
“▲” beside the score: it is higher than NVD's CVSS score.
Score elevated to 9.0 because this CVE is listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2021-11-03), indicating real-world exploitation has been confirmed by US federal agencies. NVD baseline CVSS 7.0 retained for reference. The 9.0 is the floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: this CVE's impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 7.0 HIGH under GitHub Security Advisory CVSS. Confidence: HIGH.
Also known asEUVD-2019-8642 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-98mp-frx2-qv94 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- Actively exploited in the wild (CISA-KEV) — the reason this is sooner than the SSVC decision on this page at every mission impact level
No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2020 — use a compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and check the vendor's advisory.
The CVE record's description, written by its CNA (MITRE Corporation), states the affected versions: "TeamViewer Desktop through 14.7.1965 allows a bypass of remote-login access control because the same key is used for different customers' installations." No release containing a fix is confirmed on record.
- CVSS v3
- 7.0
- EG Score
- 9.0CRITICALhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 72EG Risk 72/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity70% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.0 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation100% × 40%Fixed at 100% for a CISA KEV listing: EchelonGraph's rule.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2020. Check the vendor's advisory for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation on your normal schedule at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 4.7%
- EPSS %ILE
- 91st
- KEV
- ⚠ Exploited
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (9.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.0 is the CISA KEV floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: its impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 7.0 HIGH.
- EG Severity
- 7.0 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 4.7% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- CISA KEV and EG-KEV Tier 1 (exploited in the wild)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: this CVE is in CISA's KEV catalog, and CISA's required action for it, quoted below, applies whether or not a fix is released.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2020. Check the vendor's advisory for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation on your normal schedule at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.
No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: this CVE is in CISA's KEV catalog, and CISA's required action for it, quoted below, applies whether or not a fix is released.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV yes (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
CISA required action“Apply updates per vendor instructions.”
Quoted verbatim from CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. CISA directs it at US federal civilian executive branch agencies under Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 26-04, which replaced BOD 22-01 on 10 June 2026; it is not EchelonGraph's advice. CISA's notes: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-18988
Published
February 7, 2020
Last Modified
November 7, 2025
Advisory Details (4)
Auto-updated Oct 27, 2026Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog | CISA
Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog | CISA. Listed in CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2019-18988Nic Losby on X: "https://t.co/avUoHNCJ4G Teamviewer has been storing user passwords encrypted with AES, not hashed, in the registry accessible to low privilege users on the machine. This works for versions dating back from at least as far back as 2012 to the latest version." / X
https://twitter.com/Blurbdust/status/1224212682594770946?s=20Specification on CVE-2019-18988 - TeamViewer Community
https://community.teamviewer.com/t5/Announcements/Specification-on-CVE-2019-18988/td-p/82264Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 20× in last 7d / 139× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 1,219 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 1,119 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-11-01 20:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-01 20:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-98mp-frx2-qv94 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 7.0
- 2026-11-01 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.7% · 91st percentile
- 2026-10-31 22:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 22:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-98mp-frx2-qv94 · GitHub CVSS 7.0
- 2026-10-31 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.7% · 91st percentile
- 2026-10-30 23:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-30 23:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-98mp-frx2-qv94 · GitHub CVSS 7.0
- 2026-10-30 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.7% · 91st percentile
- 2026-10-30 01:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-30 01:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-98mp-frx2-qv94 · GitHub CVSS 7.0
- 2026-10-29 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.7% · 91st percentile
- 2026-10-29 02:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-29 02:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-98mp-frx2-qv94 · GitHub CVSS 7.0
- 2026-10-28 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.7% · 91st percentile
- 2026-10-28 04:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-28 04:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-98mp-frx2-qv94 · GitHub CVSS 7.0
- 2026-10-27 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.7% · 91st percentile
- 2026-10-27 05:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-27 05:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-98mp-frx2-qv94 · GitHub CVSS 7.0
- 2026-10-26 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.7% · 91st percentile
- 2026-10-26 07:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-98mp-frx2-qv94 · GitHub CVSS 7.0
- 2026-10-25 19:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.7% · 91st percentile
- 2026-10-25 08:43 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-25 08:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-98mp-frx2-qv94 · GitHub CVSS 7.0
- 2026-10-24 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.7% · 91st percentile
- 2026-10-24 10:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 10:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-98mp-frx2-qv94 · GitHub CVSS 7.0
- 2026-10-23 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.7% · 91st percentile
- 2026-10-23 11:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-23 11:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-98mp-frx2-qv94 · GitHub CVSS 7.0
- 2026-10-22 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.7% · 91st percentile
- 2026-10-22 13:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 13:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-98mp-frx2-qv94 · GitHub CVSS 7.0
- 2026-10-21 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.7% · 91st percentile
- 2026-10-21 14:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-21 14:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-98mp-frx2-qv94 · GitHub CVSS 7.0
- 2026-10-20 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.7% · 91st percentile
- 2026-10-20 16:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-98mp-frx2-qv94 · GitHub CVSS 7.0
- 2026-10-19 17:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 17:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-98mp-frx2-qv94 · GitHub CVSS 7.0
- 2026-10-19 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.7% · 91st percentile
- 2026-10-18 19:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-18 19:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-98mp-frx2-qv94 · GitHub CVSS 7.0
- 2026-10-18 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.7% · 91st percentile
- 2026-10-18 09:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 20:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 20:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-98mp-frx2-qv94 · GitHub CVSS 7.0
- 2026-10-17 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.7% · 91st percentile
- 2026-10-16 21:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 21:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-98mp-frx2-qv94 · GitHub CVSS 7.0
- 2026-10-16 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.7% · 91st percentile
- 2026-10-15 23:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 23:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-98mp-frx2-qv94 · GitHub CVSS 7.0
- 2026-10-15 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.7% · 91st percentile
- 2026-10-15 00:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 00:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-98mp-frx2-qv94 · GitHub CVSS 7.0
- 2026-10-14 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.7% · 91st percentile
- 2026-10-14 02:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 02:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-98mp-frx2-qv94 · GitHub CVSS 7.0
- 2026-10-13 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.7% · 91st percentile
- 2026-10-13 03:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-98mp-frx2-qv94 · GitHub CVSS 7.0
- 2026-10-12 19:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.7% · 91st percentile
- 2026-10-12 05:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-98mp-frx2-qv94 · GitHub CVSS 7.0
- 2026-10-12 01:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-98mp-frx2-qv94 · GitHub CVSS 7.0
- 2026-10-11 21:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 21:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-98mp-frx2-qv94 · GitHub CVSS 7.0
- 2026-10-11 18:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 18:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-98mp-frx2-qv94 · GitHub CVSS 7.0
- 2026-10-11 14:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-98mp-frx2-qv94 · GitHub CVSS 7.0
- 2026-10-11 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.7% · 91st percentile
- 2026-10-11 10:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-98mp-frx2-qv94 · GitHub CVSS 7.0
- 2026-10-11 07:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-98mp-frx2-qv94 · GitHub CVSS 7.0
- 2026-10-11 03:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-98mp-frx2-qv94 · GitHub CVSS 7.0
- 2026-10-10 23:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-98mp-frx2-qv94 · GitHub CVSS 7.0
- 2026-10-10 20:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-10 20:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-98mp-frx2-qv94 · GitHub CVSS 7.0
- 2026-10-10 19:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.7% · 91st percentile
- 2026-10-10 16:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-98mp-frx2-qv94 · GitHub CVSS 7.0
- 2026-10-10 12:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-98mp-frx2-qv94 · GitHub CVSS 7.0
- 2026-10-10 09:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-98mp-frx2-qv94 · GitHub CVSS 7.0
- 2026-10-10 05:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-98mp-frx2-qv94 · GitHub CVSS 7.0
- 2026-10-10 01:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-98mp-frx2-qv94 · GitHub CVSS 7.0
- 2026-10-09 22:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-09 22:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-98mp-frx2-qv94 · GitHub CVSS 7.0
- 2026-10-09 20:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.7% · 91st percentile
- 2026-10-09 18:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-98mp-frx2-qv94 · GitHub CVSS 7.0
- 2026-10-09 14:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-98mp-frx2-qv94 · GitHub CVSS 7.0
- 2026-10-09 11:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-98mp-frx2-qv94 · GitHub CVSS 7.0
- 2026-10-09 07:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-98mp-frx2-qv94 · GitHub CVSS 7.0
- 2026-10-09 03:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-98mp-frx2-qv94 · GitHub CVSS 7.0
- 2026-10-09 00:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-98mp-frx2-qv94 · GitHub CVSS 7.0
- 2026-10-08 20:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-98mp-frx2-qv94 · GitHub CVSS 7.0
- 2026-10-08 16:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-08 16:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-98mp-frx2-qv94 · GitHub CVSS 7.0
- 2026-10-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.7% · 91st percentile
- 2026-10-08 13:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-98mp-frx2-qv94 · GitHub CVSS 7.0
Publicly available exploits
(3 references)Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 Metasploit module, 2 GitHub PoCs). No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2020. If the vendor still supports the product, apply the fixed version it names; if it no longer does, isolate the affected system.
- Metasploitpost/windows/gather/credentials/teamviewer_passwords✓ verifiedPublished Feb 7, 2020
Windows Gather TeamViewer Passwords
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCmr-r3b00t/CVE-2019-18988Published Jul 13, 2020
TeamViewer Store Credentials Decryption
Open source ↗ - Open source ↗GitHub PoCreversebrain/CVE-2019-18988Published Jul 1, 2020
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(6)
What is CVE-2019-18988?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2019-18988 published?
Is CVE-2019-18988 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2019-18988?
Which products are affected by CVE-2019-18988?
How do I remediate CVE-2019-18988?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2019-18988
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2019-18988?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.