CVE-2019-17571

CRITICALNVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2020-01-06. NVD baseline CVSS 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 4 sources updated this weekElevated

Also known asEUVD-2020-0246 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-2qrg-x229-3v8q (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High exploitation likelihood — EPSS 70%
  • Public exploit or proof-of-concept code is available
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 70%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: Public PoCExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Included in Log4j 1.2 is a SocketServer class that is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data which can be exploited to remotely execute arbitrary code when combined with a deserialization gadget when listening to untrusted network traffic for log data. This affects Log4j versions up to 1.2 up to 1.2.17.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
87
EG Risk 87/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation70% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
70%
EPSS %ILE
99th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
70% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

December 20, 2019

Last Modified

May 28, 2026

Patch Availability(20)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntuliblog4j1.2-java-doc (1.2.17-8+deb10u1build0.18.04.1) @ bionic2026-11-02ubuntu
ubuntuliblog4j1.2-java (1.2.17-7ubuntu1+esm1) @ xenial2026-11-02ubuntu
redhatlog4j-0:1.2.14-6.7.el6_102022-06-15redhat
redhatpatch2022-02-10redhat
redhatpatch2022-02-09redhat
redhatpatch2019-06-18redhat
redhatpatch2017-12-07redhat
redhatlog4j-0:1.2.14-19.patch_01.ep5.el62017-12-07redhat
redhatpatch2017-11-16redhat
redhatpatch2017-10-12redhat
redhatpatch2017-10-12redhat
redhateap7-jboss-ec2-eap-0:7.0.8-1.GA_redhat_1.ep7.el72017-09-26redhat
redhatpatch2017-09-26redhat
redhatpatch2017-09-05redhat
redhatjboss-ec2-eap-0:7.5.17-1.Final_redhat_4.ep6.el62017-09-05redhat
redhatlog4j-0:1.2.17-16.el7_42017-08-07redhat
redhattomcat-native-0:1.2.8-10.redhat_10.ep7.el72017-07-25redhat
redhatpatch2017-07-25redhat
mavenlog4j:log4j—ghsa
mavenorg.zenframework.z8.dependencies.commons:log4j-1.2.17—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(9 across 8 ecosystems)
Maven(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
log4j:log4j1.2.11 ... 1.2.9 (13 versions)
  • 1.2 through 1.2.17: no fix on record
—
org.zenframework.z8.dependencies.commons:log4j-1.2.172.0——
Debian:10(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
apache-log4j1.21.2.17-8
  • every version up to 1.2.17-8+deb10u1: fixed in 1.2.17-8+deb10u1
—
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
apache-log4j1.2—
  • every version up to 1.2.17-9: fixed in 1.2.17-9
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
apache-log4j1.2—
  • every version up to 1.2.17-9: fixed in 1.2.17-9
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
apache-log4j1.2—
  • every version up to 1.2.17-9: fixed in 1.2.17-9
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
apache-log4j1.2—
  • every version up to 1.2.17-9: fixed in 1.2.17-9
—
Debian:8(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
apache-log4j1.21.2.17-5
  • every version up to 1.2.17-5+deb8u1: fixed in 1.2.17-5+deb8u1
—
Debian:9(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
apache-log4j1.21.2.17-7
  • every version up to 1.2.17-7+deb9u1: fixed in 1.2.17-7+deb9u1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(2)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 25× in last 7d / 84× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 99 of 198 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 1 repeat row among the latest 100 is merged into the row it repeats. The 99 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-02 01:32 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-11-02 01:32 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-02 01:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qrg-x229-3v8q · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  4. 2026-11-01 01:10 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-11-01 01:10 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-11-01 01:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qrg-x229-3v8q · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  7. 2026-10-31 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 70% · 99th percentile
  8. 2026-10-31 00:46 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-31 00:46 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-10-31 00:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qrg-x229-3v8q · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  11. 2026-10-30 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 70% · 99th percentile
  12. 2026-10-30 00:25 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-30 00:25 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-10-30 00:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qrg-x229-3v8q · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  15. 2026-10-29 00:04 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-29 00:04 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-10-29 00:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qrg-x229-3v8q · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  18. 2026-10-27 23:42 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-27 23:42 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-27 23:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qrg-x229-3v8q · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  21. 2026-10-27 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 70% · 99th percentile
  22. 2026-10-26 23:18 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-26 23:18 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-26 23:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qrg-x229-3v8q · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  25. 2026-10-26 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 70% · 99th percentile
Show 74 more
  1. 2026-10-25 19:31 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-10-25 19:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qrg-x229-3v8q · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  3. 2026-10-25 19:03 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-25 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 70% · 99th percentile
  5. 2026-10-24 19:07 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-24 19:07 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-10-24 19:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qrg-x229-3v8q · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  8. 2026-10-24 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 70% · 99th percentile
  9. 2026-10-23 18:44 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-23 18:44 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-23 18:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qrg-x229-3v8q · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  12. 2026-10-22 18:18 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-22 18:18 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-10-22 18:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qrg-x229-3v8q · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  15. 2026-10-22 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 70% · 99th percentile
  16. 2026-10-21 17:56 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-21 17:56 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-21 17:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qrg-x229-3v8q · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  19. 2026-10-21 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 70% · 99th percentile
  20. 2026-10-20 17:35 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-20 17:35 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-20 17:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qrg-x229-3v8q · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  23. 2026-10-20 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 70% · 99th percentile
  24. 2026-10-19 17:06 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-19 17:06 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-10-19 17:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qrg-x229-3v8q · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  27. 2026-10-19 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 70% · 99th percentile
  28. 2026-10-18 16:43 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-10-18 16:43 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-10-18 16:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qrg-x229-3v8q · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  31. 2026-10-18 06:10 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-10-18 06:10 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-10-18 06:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qrg-x229-3v8q · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  34. 2026-10-17 05:46 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-10-17 05:46 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-10-17 05:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qrg-x229-3v8q · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  37. 2026-10-16 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 70% · 99th percentile
  38. 2026-10-16 05:22 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-10-16 05:22 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-10-16 05:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qrg-x229-3v8q · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  41. 2026-10-15 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 70% · 99th percentile
  42. 2026-10-15 03:49 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-10-15 03:49 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-10-15 03:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qrg-x229-3v8q · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  45. 2026-10-14 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 70% · 99th percentile
  46. 2026-10-13 23:53 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-10-13 23:53 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-10-13 23:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qrg-x229-3v8q · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  49. 2026-10-13 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 69% · 99th percentile
  50. 2026-10-12 19:59 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-10-12 19:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qrg-x229-3v8q · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  52. 2026-10-12 19:59 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-10-12 00:22 UTCEG score recompute
  54. 2026-10-11 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 69% · 99th percentile
  55. 2026-10-09 20:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 69% · 99th percentile
  56. 2026-10-07 23:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 69% · 99th percentile
  57. 2026-10-06 15:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 69% · 99th percentile
  58. 2026-10-04 23:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 69% · 99th percentile
  59. 2026-10-03 14:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 69% · 99th percentile
  60. 2026-09-30 14:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 69% · 99th percentile
  61. 2026-09-30 10:14 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-09-27 12:20 UTCOSV refresh
  63. 2026-09-26 15:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 69% · 99th percentile
  64. 2026-09-24 13:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 69% · 99th percentile
  65. 2026-09-23 13:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 69% · 99th percentile
  66. 2026-09-22 14:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 69% · 99th percentile
  67. 2026-09-21 20:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 69% · 99th percentile
  68. 2026-09-18 19:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 69% · 99th percentile
  69. 2026-09-17 19:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 69% · 99th percentile
  70. 2026-09-16 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 69% · 99th percentile
  71. 2026-09-15 03:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 69% · 99th percentile
  72. 2026-09-12 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 69% · 99th percentile
  73. 2026-09-11 09:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 69% · 99th percentile
  74. 2026-09-07 21:51 UTCOSV refresh

Publicly available exploits

(2 references)

Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 GitHub PoC), as is 1 GitHub checker repository. A GitHub repository named or described as a checker or scanner checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code. Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.

  • GitHub checkerHynekPetrak/log4shell-finder
    Published Dec 14, 2021

    Fastest filesystem scanner for log4shell (CVE-2021-44228, CVE-2021-45046) and other vulnerable (CVE-2017-5645, CVE-2019-17571, CVE-2022-23305, CVE-2022-23307 ... ) instances of log4j library. Excellent performance and low memory footprint.

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCshadow-horse/CVE-2019-17571
    Published Dec 25, 2019

    Apache Log4j 1.2.X存在反序列化远程代码执行漏洞

    Open source ↗

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2019-17571?
CVE-2019-17571 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on December 20, 2019. Included in Log4j 1.2 is a SocketServer class that is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data which can be exploited to remotely execute arbitrary code when combined with a deserialization gadget when listening to untrusted network traffic for log data. This affects Log4j versions up to 1.2…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2019-17571 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2019-17571 was published on December 20, 2019. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of May 28, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2019-17571 actively exploited?
CVE-2019-17571 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 70% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (99th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2019-17571?
CVE-2019-17571 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2019-17571?
A fix for CVE-2019-17571 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2019-17571 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2019-17571

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2019-17571?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.