CVE-2019-1652

CRITICALNVD 7.29.0
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“▲” beside the score: it is higher than NVD's CVSS score.

Score elevated to 9.0 because this CVE is listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2022-03-03), indicating real-world exploitation has been confirmed by US federal agencies. NVD baseline CVSS 7.2 retained for reference. The 9.0 is the floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: this CVE's impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 7.2 HIGH under GitHub Security Advisory CVSS. Confidence: HIGH.

Triggered by: CISA KEV (actively exploited)
Sources: CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 3 sources updated this weekExploited in the wild

Also known asEUVD-2019-10209 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.0EG
EchelonGraph verdictPatch nowTreat as an emergency — this is being exploited.
  • Actively exploited in the wild (CISA-KEV) — the reason this is sooner than the SSVC decision on this page at low or medium mission impact
CISA-KEV: ExploitedEPSS PROB: 96%CVSS: 7.2Exploit: Metasploit · Exploit-DB (verified) · other public PoCExposed services: Not assessed

The vendor states that a fix is released ("Cisco has released firmware updates that address this vulnerability"), but the CVE record does not name the fixed version — check the vendor's advisory for the fixed release and apply it.

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV320 and RV325 Dual Gigabit WAN VPN Routers could allow an authenticated, remote attacker with administrative privileges on an affected device to execute arbitrary commands. The vulnerability is due to improper validation of user-supplied input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending malicious HTTP POST requests to the web-based management interface of an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying Linux shell as root. Cisco has released firmware updates that address this vulnerability.

CVSS v3
7.2
EG Score
9.0CRITICALhigh confidence
EG Risk
72
EG Risk 72/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity72% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.2 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation100% × 40%
Fixed at 100% for a CISA KEV listing: EchelonGraph's rule.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Attend at medium and Act at high mission impact.
Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: The vendor states that a fix is released ("Cisco has released firmware updates that address this vulnerability"), but the CVE record does not name the fixed version. Check the vendor's advisory for the fixed release and apply it within your standard update timelines at low, sooner than that at medium and as soon as possible at high mission impact.
EPSS PROB
96%
EPSS %ILE
99th
KEV
⚠ Exploited

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.0 is the CISA KEV floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: its impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 7.2 HIGH.

EG Severity
7.2 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
96% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
CISA KEV and EG-KEV Tier 1 (exploited in the wild)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Attend at medium mission impactTrack at low, Attend at medium and Act at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Attend at medium and Act at high mission impact.

The vendor states that a fix is released ("Cisco has released firmware updates that address this vulnerability"), but the CVE record does not name the fixed version. Check the vendor's advisory for the fixed release and apply it within your standard update timelines at low, sooner than that at medium and as soon as possible at high mission impact.

Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV yes (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

CISA required action“Apply updates per vendor instructions.”

Quoted verbatim from CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. CISA directs it at US federal civilian executive branch agencies under Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 26-04, which replaced BOD 22-01 on 10 June 2026; it is not EchelonGraph's advice. CISA's notes: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-1652

Published

January 24, 2019

Last Modified

October 28, 2025

Advisory Details (8)

Auto-updated Oct 27, 2026
⚠️ Actively exploited (CISA KEV, CISA Vulnrichment). Vendor states a fix is released — the CVE record does not name the version.
Web page

Cisco RV320 and RV325 - Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution (Metasploit) - Hardware remote Exploit

https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/46655/
Web page🟡 PoC Available

Cisco RV320 Dual Gigabit WAN VPN Router 1.4.2.15 - Command Injection - Hardware webapps Exploit

https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/46243/
Web page

Cisco Small Business RV320 and RV325 Routers Command Injection Vulnerability

https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20190123-rv-inject
Web page🟡 PoC Available

Bugtraq: [RT-SA-2019-005] Cisco RV320 Command Injection Retrieval

https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Mar/55
Web page

PSIRT.COM — Product Security Incident Response Team

http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106728
Web page🟡 PoC Available

Full Disclosure: [RT-SA-2019-005] Cisco RV320 Command Injection Retrieval

http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Mar/61

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 13× in last 7d / 105× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 1,011 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 911 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-02 01:45 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-11-02 01:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  3. 2026-10-31 23:29 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-31 23:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  5. 2026-10-30 21:12 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-30 21:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  7. 2026-10-30 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 96% · 99th percentile
  8. 2026-10-29 18:56 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-29 18:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  10. 2026-10-28 16:39 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-28 16:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  12. 2026-10-27 14:22 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-27 14:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  14. 2026-10-26 12:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  15. 2026-10-25 19:04 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-25 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 96% · 99th percentile
  17. 2026-10-25 09:48 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-25 09:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  19. 2026-10-24 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 96% · 99th percentile
  20. 2026-10-24 07:31 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-24 07:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  22. 2026-10-23 05:13 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-23 05:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  24. 2026-10-22 02:53 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-22 02:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-21 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 96% · 99th percentile
  2. 2026-10-21 00:36 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-21 00:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  4. 2026-10-19 22:17 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-19 22:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  6. 2026-10-18 19:59 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-18 19:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  8. 2026-10-18 09:51 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-17 17:42 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-17 17:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  11. 2026-10-16 15:24 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-16 15:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  13. 2026-10-15 13:05 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-15 13:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  15. 2026-10-14 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 96% · 99th percentile
  16. 2026-10-14 10:45 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-14 10:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  18. 2026-10-13 08:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  19. 2026-10-12 20:00 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-12 06:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  21. 2026-10-12 02:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  22. 2026-10-11 22:31 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-11 22:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  24. 2026-10-11 18:43 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-11 18:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  26. 2026-10-11 14:54 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-10-11 14:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  28. 2026-10-11 11:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  29. 2026-10-11 07:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  30. 2026-10-11 03:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  31. 2026-10-10 23:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  32. 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-10-10 19:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  34. 2026-10-10 19:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 96% · 99th percentile
  35. 2026-10-10 16:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  36. 2026-10-10 12:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  37. 2026-10-10 08:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  38. 2026-10-10 04:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  39. 2026-10-10 01:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  40. 2026-10-09 21:15 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-10-09 21:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  42. 2026-10-09 20:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 96% · 99th percentile
  43. 2026-10-09 17:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  44. 2026-10-09 13:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  45. 2026-10-09 09:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  46. 2026-10-09 06:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  47. 2026-10-09 02:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  48. 2026-10-08 22:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  49. 2026-10-08 18:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  50. 2026-10-08 14:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  51. 2026-10-08 11:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  52. 2026-10-08 07:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  53. 2026-10-08 03:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  54. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  55. 2026-10-07 20:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  56. 2026-10-07 16:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  57. 2026-10-07 12:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  58. 2026-10-07 08:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  59. 2026-10-07 04:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  60. 2026-10-07 01:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  61. 2026-10-06 21:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  62. 2026-10-06 17:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  63. 2026-10-06 13:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  64. 2026-10-06 09:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  65. 2026-10-06 06:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  66. 2026-10-06 02:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  67. 2026-10-05 22:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  68. 2026-10-05 18:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  69. 2026-10-05 14:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  70. 2026-10-05 11:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  71. 2026-10-05 07:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  72. 2026-10-05 03:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  73. 2026-10-04 23:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  74. 2026-10-04 19:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  75. 2026-10-04 16:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-73jm-6x85-hwg5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2

Publicly available exploits

(4 references)

Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 Metasploit module, 2 Exploit-DB entries, 1 GitHub PoC). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.

  • Exploit-DBEDB-46655✓ verified
    Published Apr 3, 2019

    Cisco RV320 and RV325 - Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution (Metasploit)

    Open source ↗
  • Metasploitexploit/linux/http/cisco_rv32x_rce✓ verified
    Published Mar 28, 2019

    Cisco RV320 and RV325 Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution

    Open source ↗
  • Exploit-DBEDB-46243✓ verified
    Published Jan 25, 2019

    Cisco RV320 Dual Gigabit WAN VPN Router 1.4.2.15 - Command Injection

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoC0x27/CiscoRV320Dump
    Published Jan 24, 2019

    CVE-2019-1652 /CVE-2019-1653 Exploits For Dumping Cisco RV320 Configurations & Debugging Data AND Remote Root Exploit!

    Open source ↗

Frequently asked(6)

What is CVE-2019-1652?
CVE-2019-1652 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on January 24, 2019. A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV320 and RV325 Dual Gigabit WAN VPN Routers could allow an authenticated, remote attacker with administrative privileges on an affected device to execute arbitrary commands. The vulnerability is due to improper…
When was CVE-2019-1652 made public?
CVE-2019-1652 was made public on January 23, 2019: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, Cisco Systems, Inc., gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on January 24, 2019. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 28, 2025; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2019-1652 actively exploited?
Yes. CISA added CVE-2019-1652 to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on March 3, 2022, affecting Cisco Small Business RV320 and RV325 Dual Gigabit WAN VPN Routers. KEV listing indicates confirmed exploitation in the wild; this CVE warrants immediate attention. The vendor states that a fix is released ("Cisco has released firmware updates that address this vulnerability"), but the CVE record does not name the fixed version. Check the vendor's advisory for the fixed release and apply it.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2019-1652?
CVE-2019-1652 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.2 (NVD). EchelonGraph synthesises NVD + CISA KEV + FIRST EPSS + GHSA into a combined EG score of 9.0 (CRITICAL).
Which products are affected by CVE-2019-1652?
CVE-2019-1652 affects Cisco Small Business RV320 and RV325 Dual Gigabit WAN VPN Routers.
How do I remediate CVE-2019-1652?
The CVE record for CVE-2019-1652 states that the vendor has released a fix: "Cisco has released firmware updates that address this vulnerability." The record does not name the fixed version: check the vendor's advisory for the fixed release and update to it.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2019-1652

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2019-1652?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.