A type confusion vulnerability can occur when manipulating JavaScript objects due to issues in Array.pop. This can allow for an exploitable crash. We are aware of targeted attacks in the wild abusing this flaw. This vulnerability affects Firefox ESR < 60.7.1, Firefox < 67.0.3, and Thunderbird < 60.7.2.
CVE-2019-11707
“▲” beside the score: it is higher than NVD's CVSS score.
Score elevated to 9.0 because this CVE is listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2022-05-23), indicating real-world exploitation has been confirmed by US federal agencies. NVD baseline CVSS 8.8 retained for reference. The 9.0 is the floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: this CVE's impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 8.8 HIGH under GitHub Security Advisory CVSS. Confidence: HIGH.
Also known asEUVD-2019-3377 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-8ffr-q7j8-h445 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- Actively exploited in the wild (CISA-KEV) — the reason this is sooner than the SSVC decision on this page at low or medium mission impact
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 8.8
- EG Score
- 9.0CRITICALhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 80EG Risk 80/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity88% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation100% × 40%Fixed at 100% for a CISA KEV listing: EchelonGraph's rule.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Attend at medium and Act at high mission impact.Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low, sooner than that at medium and as soon as possible at high mission impact. - EPSS PROB
- 38%
- EPSS %ILE
- 98th
- KEV
- ⚠ Exploited
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (9.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.0 is the CISA KEV floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: its impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 8.8 HIGH.
- EG Severity
- 8.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 38% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- CISA KEV and EG-KEV Tier 1 (exploited in the wild)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Attend at medium mission impactTrack at low, Attend at medium and Act at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Attend at medium and Act at high mission impact.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low, sooner than that at medium and as soon as possible at high mission impact.
Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV yes (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
CISA required action“Apply updates per vendor instructions.”
Quoted verbatim from CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. CISA directs it at US federal civilian executive branch agencies under Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 26-04, which replaced BOD 22-01 on 10 June 2026; it is not EchelonGraph's advice. CISA's notes: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-11707
Published
July 23, 2019
Last Modified
October 27, 2025
Advisory Details (5)
Auto-updated Nov 2, 2026Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog | CISA
Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog | CISA. Listed in CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2019-11707Security vulnerabilities fixed in Thunderbird 60.7.2 — Mozilla
https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2019-20/Security vulnerabilities fixed in Firefox 67.0.3 and Firefox ESR 60.7.1 — Mozilla
https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2019-18/Mozilla Firefox: Multiple vulnerabilities (GLSA 201908-12) — Gentoo security
https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201908-121544386 - (CVE-2019-11707) Spidermonkey: IonMonkey incorrectly predicts return type of Array.prototype.pop, leading to type confusions
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1544386Patch Availability(8)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ubuntu | xul-ext-lightning (1:60.7.2+build2-0ubuntu0.16.04.1) @ xenial | 2026-11-02 | ubuntu |
| ubuntu | firefox-testsuite (67.0.3+build1-0ubuntu0.18.04.1) @ bionic | 2026-11-02 | ubuntu |
| redhat | firefox-0:60.7.2-3.el8_0 | 2019-07-08 | redhat |
| redhat | thunderbird-0:60.7.2-2.el8_0 | 2019-06-27 | redhat |
| redhat | thunderbird-0:60.7.2-2.el6_10 | 2019-06-27 | redhat |
| redhat | thunderbird-0:60.7.2-2.el7_6 | 2019-06-27 | redhat |
| redhat | firefox-0:60.7.2-1.el6_10 | 2019-06-25 | redhat |
| redhat | firefox-0:60.7.2-1.el7_6 | 2019-06-25 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(15 across 9 ecosystems)
Debian:11(2)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| firefox-esr | — |
| — |
| thunderbird | — |
| — |
Debian:12(2)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| firefox-esr | — |
| — |
| thunderbird | — |
| — |
Debian:13(2)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| firefox-esr | — |
| — |
| thunderbird | — |
| — |
Debian:14(2)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| firefox-esr | — |
| — |
| thunderbird | — |
| — |
Debian:8(2)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| firefox-esr | 45.0.1esr-1 ... 60.7.0esr-1~deb9u1 (142 versions) |
| — |
| thunderbird | 1.5-4 ... 1:60.7.1-1~deb9u1 (80 versions) |
| — |
Debian:9(2)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| firefox-esr | 45.9.0esr-1 ... 60.7.1esr-1~deb8u1 (105 versions) |
| — |
| thunderbird | 1.5-4 ... 1:60.7.2-1~deb8u1 (81 versions) |
| — |
Alpine:v3.10(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| mozjs60 | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| mozjs60 | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| mozjs60 | — |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
All Vendor Advisories
(8)
Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.
- Red HatRHSA-2019:1603CRITICAL2019-06-19
RHSA-2019:1603 — Critical
- Red HatRHSA-2019:1604CRITICAL2019-06-19
RHSA-2019:1604 — Critical
- Red HatRHSA-2019:1623CRITICAL2019-06-19
RHSA-2019:1623 — Critical
- Red HatRHSA-2019:1624CRITICAL2019-06-19
RHSA-2019:1624 — Critical
- Red HatRHSA-2019:1626CRITICAL2019-06-19
RHSA-2019:1626 — Critical
- Red HatRHSA-2019:1696CRITICAL2019-06-19
RHSA-2019:1696 — Critical
- UbuntuUSN-4020-1HIGH
Firefox vulnerability
- UbuntuUSN-4045-1HIGH
Thunderbird vulnerabilities
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 26× in last 7d / 192× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 1,801 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 1,701 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-11-02 01:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-02 01:22 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-11-02 01:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8ffr-q7j8-h445 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-11-01 01:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-01 01:45 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-11-01 01:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8ffr-q7j8-h445 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-31 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 38% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-31 02:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 02:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-31 02:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8ffr-q7j8-h445 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-30 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 38% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-30 02:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-30 02:31 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-30 02:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8ffr-q7j8-h445 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-29 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 38% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-29 02:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-29 02:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-29 02:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8ffr-q7j8-h445 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-28 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 38% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-28 03:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-28 03:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-28 03:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8ffr-q7j8-h445 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-27 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 38% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-27 03:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-27 03:39 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-27 03:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8ffr-q7j8-h445 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-26 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 38% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-26 04:00 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-26 04:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8ffr-q7j8-h445 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-25 19:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 38% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-25 04:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 04:23 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-25 04:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8ffr-q7j8-h445 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-24 04:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 04:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-24 04:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8ffr-q7j8-h445 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-23 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 38% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-23 05:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-23 05:07 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-23 05:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8ffr-q7j8-h445 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-22 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 38% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-22 05:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 05:29 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-22 05:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8ffr-q7j8-h445 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-21 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 38% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-21 05:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-21 05:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-21 05:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8ffr-q7j8-h445 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-20 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 38% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-20 06:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-20 06:13 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-20 06:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8ffr-q7j8-h445 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-19 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 38% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-19 06:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 06:35 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-19 06:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8ffr-q7j8-h445 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-18 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 38% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-18 06:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-18 06:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-18 06:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8ffr-q7j8-h445 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-17 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 38% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-17 07:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 07:18 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-17 07:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8ffr-q7j8-h445 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-16 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 38% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-16 07:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 07:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-16 07:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8ffr-q7j8-h445 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-15 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 38% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-15 08:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 08:02 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-15 08:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8ffr-q7j8-h445 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-14 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 38% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-14 08:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 08:23 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-14 08:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8ffr-q7j8-h445 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-13 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 38% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-13 08:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-13 08:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8ffr-q7j8-h445 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-12 20:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 38% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-12 09:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-12 09:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8ffr-q7j8-h445 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-12 04:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-12 04:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8ffr-q7j8-h445 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-12 00:30 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-12 00:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8ffr-q7j8-h445 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-11 20:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 20:10 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 20:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8ffr-q7j8-h445 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-11 15:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 15:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 15:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8ffr-q7j8-h445 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-11 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 38% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-11 11:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 11:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 11:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8ffr-q7j8-h445 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-11 07:13 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 07:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8ffr-q7j8-h445 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
Publicly available exploits
(4 references)Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (2 Exploit-DB entries, 2 GitHub PoCs). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.
- Exploit-DBEDB-47038✓ verifiedPublished Jun 26, 2019
Mozilla Spidermonkey - IonMonkey 'Array.prototype.pop' Type Confusion
Open source ↗ - Exploit-DBEDB-50691Published Feb 2, 2022
Mozilla Firefox 67 - Array.pop JIT Type Confusion
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCflabbergastedbd/cve-2019-11707Published Apr 13, 2020
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/project-zero/issues/detail?id=1820
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCvigneshsrao/CVE-2019-11707Published Aug 18, 2019
Exploit code for CVE-2019-11707 on Firefox 66.0.3 running on Ubuntu
Open source ↗
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownAlpine:v3.10:mozjs60 · Debian:8:thunderbird
- CVE-2019-11708EG 10.0 KEVEPSS p99CRITICAL
- CVE-2018-18505EG 10.0EPSS p91CRITICAL
- CVE-2020-6831EG 9.8EPSS p93CRITICAL
- CVE-2020-12395EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2020-6825EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2020-6814EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2019-9820EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2019-9819EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2019-9800EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2019-11713EG 9.8CRITICAL
Same vendor
5 shownredhat:RHSA-2019:1603 · redhat:RHSA-2019:1623
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-843
- CVE-2019-11706EG 7.5EPSS p96HIGH
- CVE-2019-9816EG 5.9EPSS p93MEDIUM
- CVE-2019-9819EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2019-10980EG 7.8HIGH
- CVE-2019-14537EG 9.8EPSS p93CRITICAL
- CVE-2019-13118NVD 5.3EG 7.5EPSS p92HIGH
- CVE-2019-2130EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2019-8019EG 8.8EPSS p91HIGH
- CVE-2019-7969EG 9.8EPSS p94CRITICAL
- CVE-2019-7970EG 9.8EPSS p94CRITICAL
Frequently asked(6)
What is CVE-2019-11707?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2019-11707 published?
Is CVE-2019-11707 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2019-11707?
Which products are affected by CVE-2019-11707?
How do I remediate CVE-2019-11707?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2019-11707
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2019-11707?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.