CVE-2018-5745

MEDIUMNVD 4.94.9
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 4.9 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2022-05-24. NVD baseline CVSS 4.9; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3

Also known asEUVD-2018-17514 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-p5r3-98fj-vgcv (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

4.9EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 2.3%CVSS: 4.9Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

"managed-keys" is a feature which allows a BIND resolver to automatically maintain the keys used by trust anchors which operators configure for use in DNSSEC validation. Due to an error in the managed-keys feature it is possible for a BIND server which uses managed-keys to exit due to an assertion failure if, during key rollover, a trust anchor's keys are replaced with keys which use an unsupported algorithm. Versions affected: BIND 9.9.0 -> 9.10.8-P1, 9.11.0 -> 9.11.5-P1, 9.12.0 -> 9.12.3-P1, and versions 9.9.3-S1 -> 9.11.5-S3 of BIND 9 Supported Preview Edition. Versions 9.13.0 -> 9.13.6 of the 9.13 development branch are also affected. Versions prior to BIND 9.9.0 have not been evaluated for vulnerability to CVE-2018-5745.

CVSS v3
4.9
EG Score
4.9MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
23
EG Risk 23/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity49% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 4.9 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation2.3% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
2.3%
EPSS %ILE
83rd
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (4.9): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 4.9 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
4.9 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
2.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS. FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

October 9, 2019

Last Modified

September 1, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Sep 1, 2026
Patch available. Sources: redhat.
Web page

CVE-2018-5745: An assertion failure can occur if a trust anchor rolls

https://kb.isc.org/docs/cve-2018-5745
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)

Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3552

Patch Availability(4)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntuliblwres160 (1:9.11.4+dfsg-3ubuntu5.1) @ cosmic2026-10-25ubuntu
ubuntubind9 (1:9.8.1.dfsg.P1-4ubuntu0.27) @ precise2026-10-25ubuntu
redhatbind-32:9.11.4-16.P2.el72020-03-31redhat
redhatbind-32:9.11.4-26.P2.el82019-11-05redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(25 across 25 ecosystems)
Alpine:v3.10(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
bind—
  • 9.9.0 up to 9.12.3_p4-r0: fixed in 9.12.3_p4-r0
—
Alpine:v3.11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
bind—
  • 9.9.0 up to 9.12.3_p4-r0: fixed in 9.12.3_p4-r0
—
Alpine:v3.12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
bind—
  • 9.9.0 up to 9.12.3_p4-r0: fixed in 9.12.3_p4-r0
—
Alpine:v3.13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
bind—
  • 9.9.0 up to 9.12.3_p4-r0: fixed in 9.12.3_p4-r0
—
Alpine:v3.14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
bind—
  • 9.9.0 up to 9.12.3_p4-r0: fixed in 9.12.3_p4-r0
—
Alpine:v3.15(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
bind—
  • 9.9.0 up to 9.12.3_p4-r0: fixed in 9.12.3_p4-r0
—
Alpine:v3.16(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
bind—
  • 9.9.0 up to 9.12.3_p4-r0: fixed in 9.12.3_p4-r0
—
Alpine:v3.17(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
bind—
  • 9.9.0 up to 9.12.3_p4-r0: fixed in 9.12.3_p4-r0
—
Alpine:v3.18(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
bind—
  • 9.9.0 up to 9.12.3_p4-r0: fixed in 9.12.3_p4-r0
—
Alpine:v3.19(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
bind—
  • 9.9.0 up to 9.12.3_p4-r0: fixed in 9.12.3_p4-r0
—
Alpine:v3.20(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
bind—
  • 9.9.0 up to 9.12.3_p4-r0: fixed in 9.12.3_p4-r0
—
Alpine:v3.21(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
bind—
  • 9.9.0 up to 9.12.3_p4-r0: fixed in 9.12.3_p4-r0
—
Alpine:v3.22(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
bind—
  • 9.9.0 up to 9.12.3_p4-r0: fixed in 9.12.3_p4-r0
—
Alpine:v3.23(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
bind—
  • 9.9.0 up to 9.12.3_p4-r0: fixed in 9.12.3_p4-r0
—
Alpine:v3.24(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
bind—
  • 9.9.0 up to 9.12.3_p4-r0: fixed in 9.12.3_p4-r0
—
Alpine:v3.6(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
bind—
  • 9.9.0 up to 9.11.5_p4-r0: fixed in 9.11.5_p4-r0
—
Alpine:v3.7(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
bind—
  • 9.9.0 up to 9.11.5_p4-r0: fixed in 9.11.5_p4-r0
—
Alpine:v3.8(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
bind—
  • 9.9.0 up to 9.12.3_p4-r0: fixed in 9.12.3_p4-r0
—
Alpine:v3.9(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
bind—
  • 9.9.0 up to 9.12.3_p4-r0: fixed in 9.12.3_p4-r0
—
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
bind9—
  • every version up to 1:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-1: fixed in 1:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-1
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
bind9—
  • every version up to 1:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-1: fixed in 1:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
bind9—
  • every version up to 1:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-1: fixed in 1:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
bind9—
  • every version up to 1:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-1: fixed in 1:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-1
—
Debian:8(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
bind91:9.9.5.dfsg-9 ... 1:9.9.5.dfsg-9+deb8u9 (18 versions)
  • every version up to 1:9.9.5.dfsg-9+deb8u17: fixed in 1:9.9.5.dfsg-9+deb8u17
—
Debian:9(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
bind91:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3, 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u1, 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u2, 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u3, 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u4
  • every version up to 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u5: fixed in 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u5
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(4)

Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 38× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 99 of 199 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 1 repeat row among the latest 100 is merged into the row it repeats. The 100 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-01 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 83rd percentile
  2. 2026-10-31 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 83rd percentile
  3. 2026-10-30 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 83rd percentile
  4. 2026-10-29 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 83rd percentile
  5. 2026-10-28 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 83rd percentile
  6. 2026-10-27 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 83rd percentile
  7. 2026-10-26 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 83rd percentile
  8. 2026-10-25 19:16 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-25 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 83rd percentile
  10. 2026-10-25 05:24 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-25 05:24 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-10-25 05:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p5r3-98fj-vgcv · GitHub CVSS 4.9
  13. 2026-10-24 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 83rd percentile
  14. 2026-10-23 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 83rd percentile
  15. 2026-10-22 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 83rd percentile
  16. 2026-10-21 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 82nd percentile
  17. 2026-10-20 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 82nd percentile
  18. 2026-10-19 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 82nd percentile
  19. 2026-10-18 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 82nd percentile
  20. 2026-10-18 10:06 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-17 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 82nd percentile
  22. 2026-10-16 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 82nd percentile
  23. 2026-10-15 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 82nd percentile
  24. 2026-10-14 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 82nd percentile
  25. 2026-10-13 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 82nd percentile
Show 74 more
  1. 2026-10-12 20:09 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-12 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 82nd percentile
  3. 2026-10-12 00:33 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-11 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 82nd percentile
  5. 2026-10-10 19:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 82nd percentile
  6. 2026-10-10 10:55 UTCOSV refresh
  7. 2026-10-09 20:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 82nd percentile
  8. 2026-10-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 82nd percentile
  9. 2026-10-07 23:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 82nd percentile
  10. 2026-10-06 15:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 82nd percentile
  11. 2026-10-05 17:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 82nd percentile
  12. 2026-10-04 23:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 82nd percentile
  13. 2026-10-03 14:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 82nd percentile
  14. 2026-10-01 19:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 82nd percentile
  15. 2026-09-30 14:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 82nd percentile
  16. 2026-09-30 10:03 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-09-29 15:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 82nd percentile
  18. 2026-09-28 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 82nd percentile
  19. 2026-09-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 82nd percentile
  20. 2026-09-26 15:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 82nd percentile
  21. 2026-09-24 13:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 82nd percentile
  22. 2026-09-23 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 82nd percentile
  23. 2026-09-21 20:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 82nd percentile
  24. 2026-09-20 20:26 UTCOSV refresh
  25. 2026-09-20 20:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 82nd percentile
  26. 2026-09-19 15:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 82nd percentile
  27. 2026-09-18 19:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 82nd percentile
  28. 2026-09-17 19:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 82nd percentile
  29. 2026-09-15 03:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 82nd percentile
  30. 2026-09-13 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 82nd percentile
  31. 2026-09-11 14:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 82nd percentile
  32. 2026-09-11 09:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 82nd percentile
  33. 2026-09-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 82nd percentile
  34. 2026-09-04 13:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
  35. 2026-09-04 05:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
  36. 2026-09-02 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
  37. 2026-09-01 19:59 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-09-01 19:59 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-09-01 19:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p5r3-98fj-vgcv · GitHub CVSS 4.9
  40. 2026-09-01 03:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
  41. 2026-08-30 19:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
  42. 2026-08-30 01:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
  43. 2026-08-28 21:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
  44. 2026-08-27 14:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
  45. 2026-08-26 14:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
  46. 2026-08-25 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
  47. 2026-08-24 14:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
  48. 2026-08-21 23:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
  49. 2026-08-21 13:14 UTCOSV refresh
  50. 2026-08-20 22:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
  51. 2026-08-19 17:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
  52. 2026-08-18 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
  53. 2026-08-17 13:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
  54. 2026-08-16 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
  55. 2026-08-16 02:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
  56. 2026-08-15 01:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
  57. 2026-08-13 21:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
  58. 2026-08-12 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
  59. 2026-08-09 13:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
  60. 2026-08-08 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
  61. 2026-08-07 16:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
  62. 2026-08-06 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
  63. 2026-08-05 23:54 UTCOSV refresh
  64. 2026-08-04 15:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
  65. 2026-08-04 10:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
  66. 2026-08-03 10:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
  67. 2026-08-02 02:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
  68. 2026-08-01 04:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
  69. 2026-07-30 16:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
  70. 2026-07-30 01:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
  71. 2026-07-28 15:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
  72. 2026-07-27 14:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
  73. 2026-07-26 14:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
  74. 2026-07-25 14:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2018-5745?
CVE-2018-5745 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on October 9, 2019. "managed-keys" is a feature which allows a BIND resolver to automatically maintain the keys used by trust anchors which operators configure for use in DNSSEC validation. Due to an error in the managed-keys feature it is possible for a BIND server which uses managed-keys to exit due to an assertion…
When was CVE-2018-5745 made public?
CVE-2018-5745 was made public on February 21, 2019: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, Internet Systems Consortium (ISC), gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on October 9, 2019. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 1, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2018-5745 actively exploited?
CVE-2018-5745 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 2.3% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (83rd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2018-5745?
CVE-2018-5745 has a CVSS v3 base score of 4.9 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2018-5745?
A fix for CVE-2018-5745 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2018-5745

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2018-5745?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.