CVE-2018-11307

CRITICALNVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2019-07-16. NVD baseline CVSS 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 4 sources updated this week

Also known asEUVD-2019-0602 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-qr7j-h6gg-jmgc (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 5.7%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

An issue was discovered in FasterXML jackson-databind 2.0.0 through 2.9.5. Use of Jackson default typing along with a gadget class from iBatis allows exfiltration of content. Fixed in 2.7.9.4, 2.8.11.2, and 2.9.6.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
61
EG Risk 61/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation5.7% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
5.7%
EPSS %ILE
93rd
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
5.7% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

July 9, 2019

Last Modified

October 8, 2026

Advisory Details (10)

Auto-updated Oct 30, 2026
Patch available. Sources: redhat.
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:4037
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3892
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3149
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3140
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3002
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2858
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2804
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1823
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1822
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0782

Patch Availability(11)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulibjackson2-databind-java-doc (2.4.2-3ubuntu0.1~esm2) @ xenial2026-10-31ubuntu
redhatjackson-databind2019-12-02redhat
redhatopenshift3/ose-logging-elasticsearch5:v3.11.153-22019-10-18redhat
redhatopenshift4/ose-logging-elasticsearch5:v4.1.18-2019092019152019-09-27redhat
redhateap7-yasson-0:1.0.2-1.redhat_00001.1.el7eap2019-05-08redhat
redhateap7-yasson-0:1.0.2-1.redhat_00001.1.el6eap2019-05-08redhat
redhatpatch2019-04-24redhat
redhatrh-maven35-jackson-databind-0:2.7.6-2.5.el72019-04-17redhat
mavencom.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind @ 2.7.9.4 (fixes >= 2.0.0, <= 2.7.9.3)—ghsa
mavencom.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind @ 2.8.11.2 (fixes >= 2.8.0, <= 2.8.11.1)—ghsa
mavencom.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind @ 2.9.6 (fixes >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.6)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(7 across 7 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
jackson-databind—
  • every version up to 2.9.8-1: fixed in 2.9.8-1
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
jackson-databind—
  • every version up to 2.9.8-1: fixed in 2.9.8-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
jackson-databind—
  • every version up to 2.9.8-1: fixed in 2.9.8-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
jackson-databind—
  • every version up to 2.9.8-1: fixed in 2.9.8-1
—
Debian:8(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
jackson-databind2.4.2-2, 2.4.2-2+deb8u1, 2.4.2-2+deb8u2, 2.4.2-2+deb8u3, 2.4.2-2+deb8u4
  • every version up to 2.4.2-2+deb8u5: fixed in 2.4.2-2+deb8u5
—
Debian:9(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
jackson-databind2.8.6-1, 2.8.6-1+deb9u1, 2.8.6-1+deb9u2, 2.8.6-1+deb9u3, 2.8.6-1+deb9u4
  • every version up to 2.8.6-1+deb9u5: fixed in 2.8.6-1+deb9u5
—
Maven(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind2.9.0 ... 2.9.5 (10 versions)
  • 2.0.0 up to 2.7.9.4: fixed in 2.7.9.4
  • 2.8.0 up to 2.8.11.2: fixed in 2.8.11.2
  • 2.9.0 up to 2.9.6: fixed in 2.9.6
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(11)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 22× in last 7d / 75× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 99 of 230 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 1 repeat row among the latest 100 is merged into the row it repeats. The 131 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-01 19:37 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-11-01 19:37 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-01 19:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qr7j-h6gg-jmgc · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  4. 2026-11-01 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.7% · 93rd percentile
  5. 2026-11-01 08:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qr7j-h6gg-jmgc · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  6. 2026-11-01 08:43 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-31 17:43 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-31 17:43 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-10-31 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.7% · 93rd percentile
  10. 2026-10-30 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.7% · 93rd percentile
  11. 2026-10-30 15:49 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-30 15:49 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-29 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.7% · 93rd percentile
  14. 2026-10-29 13:56 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-29 13:56 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-28 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.7% · 93rd percentile
  17. 2026-10-28 12:02 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-28 12:02 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-10-27 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.7% · 93rd percentile
  20. 2026-10-27 10:09 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-27 10:09 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-26 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.7% · 92nd percentile
  23. 2026-10-26 08:14 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-25 19:26 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-25 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.7% · 92nd percentile
Show 74 more
  1. 2026-10-25 06:18 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-25 06:18 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-10-24 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.7% · 93rd percentile
  4. 2026-10-24 04:25 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-24 04:25 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-23 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.7% · 93rd percentile
  7. 2026-10-23 02:31 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-23 02:31 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-10-22 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.7% · 93rd percentile
  10. 2026-10-22 00:36 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-22 00:36 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-10-21 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.7% · 93rd percentile
  13. 2026-10-20 22:42 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-20 22:42 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-20 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.7% · 92nd percentile
  16. 2026-10-19 20:49 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-19 20:49 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-19 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.7% · 92nd percentile
  19. 2026-10-18 17:46 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-18 17:46 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-18 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.7% · 92nd percentile
  22. 2026-10-18 10:22 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-17 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.7% · 92nd percentile
  24. 2026-10-17 15:51 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-17 15:51 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-10-16 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.7% · 92nd percentile
  27. 2026-10-16 13:58 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-10-16 13:58 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-10-15 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.7% · 92nd percentile
  30. 2026-10-15 11:47 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-10-15 11:47 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-10-14 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.7% · 92nd percentile
  33. 2026-10-14 07:16 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-10-14 07:16 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-10-13 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.7% · 92nd percentile
  36. 2026-10-13 02:33 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-10-12 20:21 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-10-12 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.7% · 92nd percentile
  39. 2026-10-12 00:44 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-10-11 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.7% · 92nd percentile
  41. 2026-10-10 19:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.7% · 92nd percentile
  42. 2026-10-09 20:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.7% · 92nd percentile
  43. 2026-10-08 21:26 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-10-08 21:26 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-10-08 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.7% · 92nd percentile
  46. 2026-10-07 23:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.7% · 92nd percentile
  47. 2026-10-06 15:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.7% · 92nd percentile
  48. 2026-10-05 17:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.7% · 92nd percentile
  49. 2026-10-04 23:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.7% · 92nd percentile
  50. 2026-10-03 14:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.7% · 92nd percentile
  51. 2026-09-30 14:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.7% · 92nd percentile
  52. 2026-09-30 09:51 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-09-28 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.7% · 92nd percentile
  54. 2026-09-28 01:19 UTCOSV refresh
  55. 2026-09-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.7% · 92nd percentile
  56. 2026-09-26 15:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.7% · 92nd percentile
  57. 2026-09-26 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.7% · 92nd percentile
  58. 2026-09-24 13:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.7% · 92nd percentile
  59. 2026-09-23 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.7% · 92nd percentile
  60. 2026-09-21 20:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.7% · 92nd percentile
  61. 2026-09-20 20:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.7% · 92nd percentile
  62. 2026-09-19 15:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.7% · 92nd percentile
  63. 2026-09-18 19:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.7% · 92nd percentile
  64. 2026-09-17 19:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.7% · 92nd percentile
  65. 2026-09-16 14:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.7% · 92nd percentile
  66. 2026-09-16 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.7% · 92nd percentile
  67. 2026-09-15 03:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.7% · 92nd percentile
  68. 2026-09-13 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.7% · 92nd percentile
  69. 2026-09-12 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.7% · 92nd percentile
  70. 2026-09-11 14:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.7% · 92nd percentile
  71. 2026-09-10 09:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.7% · 92nd percentile
  72. 2026-09-08 09:19 UTCOSV refresh
  73. 2026-09-07 15:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.7% · 92nd percentile
  74. 2026-09-06 13:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.7% · 92nd percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2018-11307?
CVE-2018-11307 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on July 9, 2019. An issue was discovered in FasterXML jackson-databind 2.0.0 through 2.9.5. Use of Jackson default typing along with a gadget class from iBatis allows exfiltration of content. Fixed in 2.7.9.4, 2.8.11.2, and 2.9.6.
When was the CVE record for CVE-2018-11307 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2018-11307 was published on July 9, 2019. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 8, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2018-11307 actively exploited?
CVE-2018-11307 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 5.7% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (93rd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2018-11307?
CVE-2018-11307 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2018-11307?
A fix for CVE-2018-11307 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2018-11307 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2018-11307

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2018-11307?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.