The Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) subsystem of Cisco IOS and IOS XE Software contains multiple vulnerabilities that could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to remotely execute code on an affected system or cause an affected system to reload. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending a crafted SNMP packet to an affected system via IPv4 or IPv6. Only traffic directed to an affected system can be used to exploit these vulnerabilities. The vulnerabilities are due to a buffer overflow condition in the SNMP subsystem of the affected software. The vulnerabilities affect all versions of SNMP - Versions 1, 2c, and 3. To exploit these vulnerabilities via SNMP Version 2c or earlier, the attacker must know the SNMP read-only community string for the affected system. To exploit these vulnerabilities via SNMP Version 3, the attacker must have user credentials for the affected system. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code and obtain full control of the affected system or cause the affected system to reload. Customers are advised to apply the workaround as contained in the Workarounds section below. Fixed software information is available via the Cisco IOS Software Checker. All devices that have enabled SNMP and have not explicitly excluded the affected MIBs or OIDs should be considered vulnerable. There are workarounds that address these vulnerabilities.
CVE-2017-6738
“▲” beside the score: it is higher than NVD's CVSS score.
Score elevated to 9.0 because this CVE is listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2022-03-03), indicating real-world exploitation has been confirmed by US federal agencies. NVD baseline CVSS 8.8 retained for reference. The 9.0 is the floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: this CVE's impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 8.8 HIGH under GitHub Security Advisory CVSS. Confidence: HIGH.
Also known asEUVD-2017-15792 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-3qj9-m33f-45xw (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- Actively exploited in the wild (CISA-KEV) — the reason this is sooner than the SSVC decision on this page at low or medium mission impact
The vendor states that a fix is released ("Fixed software information is available via the Cisco IOS Software Checker"), but the CVE record does not name the fixed version — check the vendor's advisory for the fixed release and apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 8.8
- EG Score
- 9.0CRITICALhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 80EG Risk 80/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity88% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation100% × 40%Fixed at 100% for a CISA KEV listing: EchelonGraph's rule.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Attend at medium and Act at high mission impact.Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: The vendor states that a fix is released ("Fixed software information is available via the Cisco IOS Software Checker"), but the CVE record does not name the fixed version. Check the vendor's advisory for the fixed release and apply it within your standard update timelines at low, sooner than that at medium and as soon as possible at high mission impact. - EPSS PROB
- 11%
- EPSS %ILE
- 95th
- KEV
- ⚠ Exploited
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (9.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.0 is the CISA KEV floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: its impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 8.8 HIGH.
- EG Severity
- 8.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 11% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-31). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- CISA KEV and EG-KEV Tier 1 (exploited in the wild)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Attend at medium mission impactTrack at low, Attend at medium and Act at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Attend at medium and Act at high mission impact.
The vendor states that a fix is released ("Fixed software information is available via the Cisco IOS Software Checker"), but the CVE record does not name the fixed version. Check the vendor's advisory for the fixed release and apply it within your standard update timelines at low, sooner than that at medium and as soon as possible at high mission impact.
Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV yes (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
CISA required action“Apply updates per vendor instructions.”
Quoted verbatim from CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. CISA directs it at US federal civilian executive branch agencies under Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 26-04, which replaced BOD 22-01 on 10 June 2026; it is not EchelonGraph's advice. CISA's notes: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-6738
Published
July 17, 2017
Last Modified
June 17, 2026
Advisory Details (4)
Auto-updated Oct 26, 2026Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog | CISA
Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog | CISA. Listed in CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2017-6738SNMP Remote Code Execution Vulnerabilities in Cisco IOS and IOS XE Software
https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20170629-snmpSNMP Remote Code Execution Vulnerabilities in Cisco IOS and IOS XE Software
https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20170629-snmpWeakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 18× in last 7d / 136× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 1,214 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 1,114 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-11-01 07:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-01 07:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qj9-m33f-45xw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-31 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
- 2026-10-31 06:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 06:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qj9-m33f-45xw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-30 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
- 2026-10-30 04:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-30 04:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qj9-m33f-45xw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-29 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
- 2026-10-29 03:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-29 03:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qj9-m33f-45xw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-28 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
- 2026-10-28 02:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-28 02:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qj9-m33f-45xw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-27 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
- 2026-10-27 00:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-27 00:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qj9-m33f-45xw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-26 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
- 2026-10-25 23:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qj9-m33f-45xw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-25 19:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
- 2026-10-24 22:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 22:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qj9-m33f-45xw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-24 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
- 2026-10-23 20:54 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-23 20:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qj9-m33f-45xw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-23 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
- 2026-10-22 19:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 19:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qj9-m33f-45xw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-22 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
- 2026-10-21 18:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-21 18:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qj9-m33f-45xw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-21 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
- 2026-10-20 16:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-20 16:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qj9-m33f-45xw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-20 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
- 2026-10-19 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
- 2026-10-19 15:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 15:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qj9-m33f-45xw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-18 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
- 2026-10-18 14:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qj9-m33f-45xw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-18 10:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
- 2026-10-17 12:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 12:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qj9-m33f-45xw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-16 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
- 2026-10-16 11:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 11:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qj9-m33f-45xw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-15 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
- 2026-10-15 10:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 10:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qj9-m33f-45xw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-14 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
- 2026-10-14 08:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 08:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qj9-m33f-45xw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-13 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
- 2026-10-13 07:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qj9-m33f-45xw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-12 20:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
- 2026-10-12 06:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qj9-m33f-45xw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-12 02:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qj9-m33f-45xw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-11 22:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 22:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qj9-m33f-45xw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-11 19:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 19:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qj9-m33f-45xw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-11 15:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 15:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qj9-m33f-45xw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-11 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
- 2026-10-11 11:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 11:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qj9-m33f-45xw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-11 07:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qj9-m33f-45xw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-11 04:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qj9-m33f-45xw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-11 00:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qj9-m33f-45xw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-10 20:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-10 20:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qj9-m33f-45xw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-10 19:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
- 2026-10-10 16:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qj9-m33f-45xw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-10 13:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qj9-m33f-45xw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-10 09:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qj9-m33f-45xw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-10 05:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qj9-m33f-45xw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-10 02:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qj9-m33f-45xw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-09 22:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-09 22:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qj9-m33f-45xw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-09 20:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
- 2026-10-09 18:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qj9-m33f-45xw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-09 14:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qj9-m33f-45xw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-09 11:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qj9-m33f-45xw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-09 07:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qj9-m33f-45xw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-09 03:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qj9-m33f-45xw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-08 23:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qj9-m33f-45xw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-08 20:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-08 20:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qj9-m33f-45xw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-08 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
- 2026-10-08 16:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qj9-m33f-45xw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-08 12:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qj9-m33f-45xw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-08 08:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qj9-m33f-45xw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-08 05:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qj9-m33f-45xw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-08 01:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-08 01:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qj9-m33f-45xw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-07 23:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
- 2026-10-07 21:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qj9-m33f-45xw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-119
- CVE-2017-6739NVD 8.8EG 9.0 KEVEPSS p96CRITICAL
- CVE-2017-6737NVD 8.8EG 9.0 KEVEPSS p99CRITICAL
- CVE-2017-6736NVD 8.8EG 9.0 KEVEPSS p99CRITICAL
- CVE-2017-6740NVD 8.8EG 9.0 KEVEPSS p96CRITICAL
- CVE-2017-6741EG 8.8EPSS p94HIGH
- CVE-2017-6742NVD 8.8EG 9.0 KEVEPSS p98CRITICAL
- CVE-2017-6743NVD 8.8EG 9.0 KEVEPSS p96CRITICAL
- CVE-2017-6744NVD 8.8EG 9.0 KEVEPSS p94CRITICAL
- CVE-2017-7008EG 7.8HIGH
- CVE-2017-7009EG 7.8HIGH
Frequently asked(6)
What is CVE-2017-6738?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2017-6738 published?
Is CVE-2017-6738 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2017-6738?
Which products are affected by CVE-2017-6738?
How do I remediate CVE-2017-6738?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2017-6738
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2017-6738?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.