The Linux kernel version 3.3-rc1 and later is affected by a vulnerability lies in the processing of incoming L2CAP commands - ConfigRequest, and ConfigResponse messages. This info leak is a result of uninitialized stack variables that may be returned to an attacker in their uninitialized state. By manipulating the code flows that precede the handling of these configuration messages, an attacker can also gain some control over which data will be held in the uninitialized stack variables. This can allow him to bypass KASLR, and stack canaries protection - as both pointers and stack canaries may be leaked in this manner. Combining this vulnerability (for example) with the previously disclosed RCE vulnerability in L2CAP configuration parsing (CVE-2017-1000251) may allow an attacker to exploit the RCE against kernels which were built with the above mitigations. These are the specifics of this vulnerability: In the function l2cap_parse_conf_rsp and in the function l2cap_parse_conf_req the following variable is declared without initialization: struct l2cap_conf_efs efs; In addition, when parsing input configuration parameters in both of these functions, the switch case for handling EFS elements may skip the memcpy call that will write to the efs variable: ... case L2CAP_CONF_EFS: if (olen == sizeof(efs)) memcpy(&efs, (void *)val, olen); ... The olen in the above if is attacker controlled, and regardless of that if, in both of these functions the efs variable would eventually be added to the outgoing configuration request that is being built: l2cap_add_conf_opt(&ptr, L2CAP_CONF_EFS, sizeof(efs), (unsigned long) &efs); So by sending a configuration request, or response, that contains an L2CAP_CONF_EFS element, but with an element length that is not sizeof(efs) - the memcpy to the uninitialized efs variable can be avoided, and the uninitialized variable would be returned to the attacker (16 bytes).
CVE-2017-1000410
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2022-05-14. NVD baseline CVSS 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.
Also known asEUVD-2017-1549 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-6jqp-hcfj-vjh3 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 7.5
- EG Score
- 7.5HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 35EG Risk 35/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity75% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation4.2% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 4.2%
- EPSS %ILE
- 90th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (7.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 7.5 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 4.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-28). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
December 7, 2017
Last Modified
June 17, 2026
References (13)
- MITRE · CVE Programhttp://seclists.org/oss-sec/2017/q4/357Issue Tracking · Mailing List · Patch · Third Party Advisory
- MITRE · CVE Programhttp://www.securityfocus.com/bid/102101 (archived copy: the site no longer serves it)Issue Tracking · Third Party Advisory · VDB Entry
- MITRE · CVE Programhttps://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0654Third Party Advisory
- MITRE · CVE Programhttps://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0676Third Party Advisory
- MITRE · CVE Programhttps://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1062Third Party Advisory
- MITRE · CVE Programhttps://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1130Third Party Advisory
- MITRE · CVE Programhttps://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1170Third Party Advisory
- MITRE · CVE Programhttps://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1319Third Party Advisory
- MITRE · CVE Programhttps://help.ecostruxureit.com/display/public/UADCE725/Security+fixes+in+StruxureWare+Data+Center+Expert+v7.6.0Third Party Advisory
- MITRE · CVE Programhttps://usn.ubuntu.com/3933-1/
- MITRE · CVE Programhttps://usn.ubuntu.com/3933-2/
- MITRE · CVE Programhttps://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-4073Third Party Advisory
- MITRE · CVE Programhttps://www.debian.org/security/2018/dsa-4082Third Party Advisory
Vendor Advisories for CVE-2017-1000410(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Patch Availability(8)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ubuntu | linux-image-3.13.0-168-generic-lpae (3.13.0-168.218~precise1) @ precise | 2026-10-29 | ubuntu |
| ubuntu | linux-image-virtual (3.13.0.168.179) @ trusty | 2026-10-29 | ubuntu |
| redhat | kernel-0:2.6.32-696.28.1.el6 | 2018-05-08 | redhat |
| redhat | kernel-0:3.10.0-693.25.2.el7 | 2018-04-17 | redhat |
| redhat | kernel-rt-1:3.10.0-693.25.2.rt56.612.el6rt | 2018-04-17 | redhat |
| redhat | kernel-0:3.10.0-862.el7 | 2018-04-10 | redhat |
| redhat | kernel-rt-0:3.10.0-862.rt56.804.el7 | 2018-04-10 | redhat |
| redhat | kernel-alt-0:4.14.0-49.el7a | 2018-04-10 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(6 across 6 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| linux | — |
| — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| linux | — |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| linux | — |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| linux | — |
| — |
Debian:8(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| linux | 3.16.36-1 ... 3.16.7-ckt9-3~deb8u1~bpo70+1 (55 versions) |
| — |
Debian:9(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| linux | 4.9.30-2 ... 4.9.65-3~bpo8+1 (16 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Additional Vendor Advisories
(7)
Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.
- Red HatRHSA-2018:0654MODERATE2017-12-06
RHSA-2018:0654 — Moderate
- Red HatRHSA-2018:0676MODERATE2017-12-06
RHSA-2018:0676 — Moderate
- Red HatRHSA-2018:1062MODERATE2017-12-06
RHSA-2018:1062 — Moderate
- Red HatRHSA-2018:1130MODERATE2017-12-06
RHSA-2018:1130 — Moderate
- Red HatRHSA-2018:1170MODERATE2017-12-06
RHSA-2018:1170 — Moderate
- UbuntuUSN-3933-1LOW
Linux kernel vulnerabilities
- UbuntuUSN-3933-2LOW
Linux kernel (Trusty HWE) vulnerabilities
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 38× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 96 of 187 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 4 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 91 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-31 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-10-30 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-10-29 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-10-29 01:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-29 01:03 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-29 01:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6jqp-hcfj-vjh3 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-28 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-10-27 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-10-26 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-10-25 19:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-10-24 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-10-23 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-10-22 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-10-22 06:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 06:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-22 06:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6jqp-hcfj-vjh3 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-21 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-10-20 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-10-19 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-10-18 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-10-18 10:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-10-16 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-10-15 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
Show 71 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-14 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-10-13 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-10-12 20:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-10-12 01:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-10-08 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-10-07 20:24 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-10-06 15:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-09-30 14:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-09-30 09:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-09-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-09-24 13:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-09-23 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-09-19 15:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-09-18 02:20 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-17 19:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-09-15 03:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-09-13 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-09-12 14:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-09-11 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-09-11 09:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-09-07 15:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-09-04 13:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-09-01 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-09-01 03:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-08-30 03:18 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-28 21:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.9% · 89th percentile
- 2026-08-27 14:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-08-25 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-08-21 23:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-08-19 16:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-08-18 13:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-08-17 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-08-16 14:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-08-16 02:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-08-15 01:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-08-13 14:51 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-12 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.3% · 90th percentile
- 2026-08-11 13:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.3% · 90th percentile
- 2026-08-08 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.3% · 90th percentile
- 2026-08-07 16:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.3% · 90th percentile
- 2026-08-06 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.3% · 90th percentile
- 2026-08-05 19:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.3% · 90th percentile
- 2026-08-04 15:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.3% · 90th percentile
- 2026-08-02 02:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.3% · 90th percentile
- 2026-08-01 04:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.3% · 90th percentile
- 2026-07-30 16:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.3% · 90th percentile
- 2026-07-30 01:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.3% · 90th percentile
- 2026-07-28 21:21 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-07-28 15:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.3% · 90th percentile
- 2026-07-26 14:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.3% · 90th percentile
- 2026-07-25 14:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.3% · 90th percentile
- 2026-07-24 14:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.3% · 90th percentile
- 2026-07-23 14:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.3% · 90th percentile
- 2026-07-23 01:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 22:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.3% · 90th percentile
- 2026-07-21 15:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.3% · 89th percentile
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownDebian:9:linux
- CVE-2019-10126EG 9.8EPSS p94CRITICAL
- CVE-2019-13272NVD 7.8EG 9.0 KEVEPSS p99CRITICAL
- CVE-2019-11479NVD 7.5EG 9.0EPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2019-11478NVD 5.3EG 9.0EPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2019-11477NVD 7.5EG 9.0EPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2017-5753NVD 5.6EG 9.0EPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2019-14821EG 8.8HIGH
- CVE-2019-3846EG 8.8EPSS p93HIGH
- CVE-2017-12134EG 8.8HIGH
- CVE-2018-9363EG 8.4HIGH
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2018:0676 · redhat:RHSA-2018:0654 · redhat:RHSA-2018:1062
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2017-1000410?
When was CVE-2017-1000410 made public?
Is CVE-2017-1000410 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2017-1000410?
How do I remediate CVE-2017-1000410?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2017-1000410
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2017-1000410?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.