The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2; Windows RT 8.1; and Windows 10 Gold, 1511, and 1607; and Windows Server 2016 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory via a crafted packets, aka "Windows SMB Information Disclosure Vulnerability."
CVE-2017-0147
“▲” beside the score: it is higher than NVD's CVSS score.
Score elevated to 9.0 because this CVE is listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2022-05-24), indicating real-world exploitation has been confirmed by US federal agencies. NVD baseline CVSS 7.5 retained for reference. The 9.0 is the floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: this CVE's impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 7.5 HIGH under NVD CVSS v3. Confidence: HIGH.
Also known asEUVD-2017-0514 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-xh7q-7r6g-64g2 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- Actively exploited in the wild (CISA-KEV) — the reason this is sooner than the SSVC decision on this page at low or medium mission impact
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 7.5
- EG Score
- 9.0CRITICALhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 89EG Risk 89/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity75% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation100% × 40%Fixed at 100% for a CISA KEV listing: EchelonGraph's rule.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Attend at low or medium mission impact; Act at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it sooner than your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and as soon as possible at high. - EPSS PROB
- 99.7%
- EPSS %ILE
- 99th
- KEV
- ⚠ Exploited
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (9.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.0 is the CISA KEV floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: its impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 7.5 HIGH.
- EG Severity
- 7.5 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
- EG Likelihood
- 99.7% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- CISA KEV and EG-KEV Tier 1 (exploited in the wild)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Attend at medium mission impactAttend at low or medium mission impact; Act at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Attend at low or medium mission impact; Act at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it sooner than your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and as soon as possible at high.
Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV yes (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
CISA required action“Apply updates per vendor instructions.”
Quoted verbatim from CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. CISA directs it at US federal civilian executive branch agencies under Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 26-04, which replaced BOD 22-01 on 10 June 2026; it is not EchelonGraph's advice. CISA's notes: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-0147
Published
March 17, 2017
Last Modified
June 17, 2026
Advisory Details (10)
Auto-updated Nov 2, 2026Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 (x64) - 'SrvOs2FeaToNt' SMB Remote Code Execution (MS17-010) - Windows_x86-64 remote Exploit
https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/41987/Microsoft Windows - SMB Remote Code Execution Scanner (MS17-010) (Metasploit) - Windows dos Exploit
https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/41891/Security Update Guide - Microsoft Security Response Center
https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2017-0147Philips Intellispace Portal ISP Vulnerabilities | CISA
https://ics-cert.us-cert.gov/advisories/ICSMA-18-058-02Packet Storm
http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/156196/SMB-DOUBLEPULSAR-Remote-Code-Execution.htmlVendor Advisories for CVE-2017-0147(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 19× in last 7d / 170× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 1,696 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 1,596 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-11-02 00:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-02 00:25 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-11-02 00:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xh7q-7r6g-64g2 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 5.9
- 2026-11-01 01:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-01 01:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-11-01 01:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xh7q-7r6g-64g2 · GitHub CVSS 5.9
- 2026-10-31 03:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 03:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-31 03:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xh7q-7r6g-64g2 · GitHub CVSS 5.9
- 2026-10-30 04:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-30 04:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-30 04:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xh7q-7r6g-64g2 · GitHub CVSS 5.9
- 2026-10-29 06:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-29 06:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xh7q-7r6g-64g2 · GitHub CVSS 5.9
- 2026-10-28 07:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-28 07:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xh7q-7r6g-64g2 · GitHub CVSS 5.9
- 2026-10-27 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 99.7% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-27 09:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-27 09:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xh7q-7r6g-64g2 · GitHub CVSS 5.9
- 2026-10-26 10:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xh7q-7r6g-64g2 · GitHub CVSS 5.9
- 2026-10-25 19:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 99.7% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-25 11:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 11:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-25 11:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xh7q-7r6g-64g2 · GitHub CVSS 5.9
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-24 13:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 13:19 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-24 13:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xh7q-7r6g-64g2 · GitHub CVSS 5.9
- 2026-10-23 14:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-23 14:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xh7q-7r6g-64g2 · GitHub CVSS 5.9
- 2026-10-22 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 99.7% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-22 16:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xh7q-7r6g-64g2 · GitHub CVSS 5.9
- 2026-10-21 17:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-21 17:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-21 17:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xh7q-7r6g-64g2 · GitHub CVSS 5.9
- 2026-10-20 18:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-20 18:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xh7q-7r6g-64g2 · GitHub CVSS 5.9
- 2026-10-19 20:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 20:25 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-19 20:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xh7q-7r6g-64g2 · GitHub CVSS 5.9
- 2026-10-18 21:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-18 21:52 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-18 21:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xh7q-7r6g-64g2 · GitHub CVSS 5.9
- 2026-10-18 10:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 23:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 23:18 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-17 23:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xh7q-7r6g-64g2 · GitHub CVSS 5.9
- 2026-10-17 00:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 00:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xh7q-7r6g-64g2 · GitHub CVSS 5.9
- 2026-10-16 02:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 02:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xh7q-7r6g-64g2 · GitHub CVSS 5.9
- 2026-10-15 03:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 03:33 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-15 03:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xh7q-7r6g-64g2 · GitHub CVSS 5.9
- 2026-10-14 04:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 04:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xh7q-7r6g-64g2 · GitHub CVSS 5.9
- 2026-10-13 06:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-13 06:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xh7q-7r6g-64g2 · GitHub CVSS 5.9
- 2026-10-12 20:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 07:47 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-12 07:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xh7q-7r6g-64g2 · GitHub CVSS 5.9
- 2026-10-12 03:45 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-12 03:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xh7q-7r6g-64g2 · GitHub CVSS 5.9
- 2026-10-11 23:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 23:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xh7q-7r6g-64g2 · GitHub CVSS 5.9
- 2026-10-11 19:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 19:45 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 19:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xh7q-7r6g-64g2 · GitHub CVSS 5.9
- 2026-10-11 15:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 15:47 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 15:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xh7q-7r6g-64g2 · GitHub CVSS 5.9
- 2026-10-11 11:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 11:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 11:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xh7q-7r6g-64g2 · GitHub CVSS 5.9
- 2026-10-11 07:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 07:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xh7q-7r6g-64g2 · GitHub CVSS 5.9
- 2026-10-11 03:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 03:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xh7q-7r6g-64g2 · GitHub CVSS 5.9
- 2026-10-10 23:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 23:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xh7q-7r6g-64g2 · GitHub CVSS 5.9
- 2026-10-10 19:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xh7q-7r6g-64g2 · GitHub CVSS 5.9
- 2026-10-10 15:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xh7q-7r6g-64g2 · GitHub CVSS 5.9
- 2026-10-10 11:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 11:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xh7q-7r6g-64g2 · GitHub CVSS 5.9
- 2026-10-10 07:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 07:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xh7q-7r6g-64g2 · GitHub CVSS 5.9
- 2026-10-10 03:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 03:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xh7q-7r6g-64g2 · GitHub CVSS 5.9
- 2026-10-09 23:56 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 23:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xh7q-7r6g-64g2 · GitHub CVSS 5.9
- 2026-10-09 19:56 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 19:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xh7q-7r6g-64g2 · GitHub CVSS 5.9
- 2026-10-09 15:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 15:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xh7q-7r6g-64g2 · GitHub CVSS 5.9
- 2026-10-09 11:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 11:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xh7q-7r6g-64g2 · GitHub CVSS 5.9
- 2026-10-09 07:59 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 07:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xh7q-7r6g-64g2 · GitHub CVSS 5.9
- 2026-10-09 04:00 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 04:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xh7q-7r6g-64g2 · GitHub CVSS 5.9
Publicly available exploits
(9 references)Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (5 Metasploit modules, 4 Exploit-DB entries). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.
- Metasploitexploit/windows/smb/smb_doublepulsar_rce✓ verifiedPublished Feb 3, 2020
SMB DOUBLEPULSAR Remote Code Execution
Open source ↗ - Exploit-DBEDB-47456✓ verifiedPublished Oct 2, 2019
DOUBLEPULSAR - Payload Execution and Neutralization (Metasploit)
Open source ↗ - Exploit-DBEDB-43970✓ verifiedPublished Feb 5, 2018
Microsoft Windows - 'EternalRomance'/'EternalSynergy'/'EternalChampion' SMB Remote Code Execution (Metasploit) (MS17-010)
Open source ↗ - Metasploitauxiliary/admin/smb/ms17_010_command✓ verifiedPublished Feb 2, 2018
MS17-010 EternalRomance/EternalSynergy/EternalChampion SMB Remote Windows Command Execution
Open source ↗ - Metasploitexploit/windows/smb/ms17_010_psexec✓ verifiedPublished Feb 2, 2018
MS17-010 EternalRomance/EternalSynergy/EternalChampion SMB Remote Windows Code Execution
Open source ↗ - Metasploitexploit/windows/smb/ms17_010_eternalblue✓ verifiedPublished May 16, 2017
MS17-010 EternalBlue SMB Remote Windows Kernel Pool Corruption
Open source ↗ - Exploit-DBEDB-41891✓ verifiedPublished Apr 17, 2017
Microsoft Windows - SMB Remote Code Execution Scanner (MS17-010) (Metasploit)
Open source ↗ - Metasploitauxiliary/scanner/smb/smb_ms17_010✓ verifiedPublished Apr 14, 2017
MS17-010 SMB RCE Detection
Open source ↗ - Exploit-DBEDB-41987Published May 10, 2017
Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 (x64) - 'SrvOs2FeaToNt' SMB Remote Code Execution (MS17-010)
Open source ↗
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-200
- CVE-2017-0128EG 4.3EPSS p98MEDIUM
- CVE-2017-0127EG 4.3EPSS p98MEDIUM
- CVE-2017-0126EG 4.3EPSS p98MEDIUM
- CVE-2017-0125EG 4.3EPSS p98MEDIUM
- CVE-2017-0124EG 4.3EPSS p98MEDIUM
- CVE-2017-0123EG 4.3EPSS p98MEDIUM
- CVE-2017-0122EG 4.3EPSS p98MEDIUM
- CVE-2017-0121NVD 4.3EG 5.3EPSS p99MEDIUM
- CVE-2017-0120EG 4.3EPSS p98MEDIUM
- CVE-2017-0119EG 4.3EPSS p98MEDIUM
Frequently asked(6)
What is CVE-2017-0147?
When was CVE-2017-0147 made public?
Is CVE-2017-0147 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2017-0147?
Which products are affected by CVE-2017-0147?
How do I remediate CVE-2017-0147?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2017-0147
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2017-0147?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.