CVE-2017-0145

CRITICALNVD 8.89.0
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“▲” beside the score: it is higher than NVD's CVSS score.

Score elevated to 9.0 because this CVE is listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2022-02-10), indicating real-world exploitation has been confirmed by US federal agencies. NVD baseline CVSS 8.8 retained for reference. The 9.0 is the floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: this CVE's impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 8.8 HIGH under NVD CVSS v3. Confidence: HIGH.

Triggered by: CISA KEV (actively exploited)
Sources: CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 4 sources updated this weekExploited in the wild

Also known asEUVD-2017-0512 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-jxmr-j43h-4x9p (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.0EG
EchelonGraph verdictPatch nowTreat as an emergency — this is being exploited.
  • Actively exploited in the wild (CISA-KEV) — the reason this is sooner than the SSVC decision on this page at low or medium mission impact
CISA-KEV: ExploitedEPSS PROB: 90%CVSS: 8.8Exploit: Metasploit · Exploit-DB (verified) · other public PoCExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2; Windows RT 8.1; and Windows 10 Gold, 1511, and 1607; and Windows Server 2016 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted packets, aka "Windows SMB Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0143, CVE-2017-0144, CVE-2017-0146, and CVE-2017-0148.

CVSS v3
8.8
EG Score
9.0CRITICALhigh confidence
EG Risk
80
EG Risk 80/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity88% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation100% × 40%
Fixed at 100% for a CISA KEV listing: EchelonGraph's rule.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Attend at medium and Act at high mission impact.
Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low, sooner than that at medium and as soon as possible at high mission impact.
EPSS PROB
90%
EPSS %ILE
99th
KEV
⚠ Exploited

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.0 is the CISA KEV floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: its impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 8.8 HIGH.

EG Severity
8.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
90% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
CISA KEV and EG-KEV Tier 1 (exploited in the wild)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Attend at medium mission impactTrack at low, Attend at medium and Act at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Attend at medium and Act at high mission impact.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low, sooner than that at medium and as soon as possible at high mission impact.

Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV yes (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

CISA required action“Apply updates per vendor instructions.”

Quoted verbatim from CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. CISA directs it at US federal civilian executive branch agencies under Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 26-04, which replaced BOD 22-01 on 10 June 2026; it is not EchelonGraph's advice. CISA's notes: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-0145

Published

March 17, 2017

Last Modified

August 14, 2026

Advisory Details (9)

Auto-updated Nov 2, 2026
⚠️ Actively exploited (CISA KEV, CISA Vulnrichment). Patch available. Sources: microsoft.
Web page

Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 (x64) - 'SrvOs2FeaToNt' SMB Remote Code Execution (MS17-010) - Windows_x86-64 remote Exploit

https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/41987/
Web page

Microsoft Windows - SMB Remote Code Execution Scanner (MS17-010) (Metasploit) - Windows dos Exploit

https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/41891/
Microsoft

Security Update Guide - Microsoft Security Response Center

https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2017-0145
Web page

Philips Intellispace Portal ISP Vulnerabilities | CISA

https://ics-cert.us-cert.gov/advisories/ICSMA-18-058-02
Web page

PSIRT.COM — Product Security Incident Response Team

http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/96705

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2017-0145(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 19× in last 7d / 183× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 1,891 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 1,791 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-02 01:54 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-11-02 01:54 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-02 01:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jxmr-j43h-4x9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  4. 2026-10-31 23:41 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-31 23:41 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-31 23:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jxmr-j43h-4x9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  7. 2026-10-30 21:29 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-30 21:29 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-10-30 21:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jxmr-j43h-4x9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  10. 2026-10-29 19:17 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-29 19:17 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-10-29 19:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jxmr-j43h-4x9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  13. 2026-10-29 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
  14. 2026-10-28 17:06 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-28 17:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jxmr-j43h-4x9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  16. 2026-10-27 14:54 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-27 14:54 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-27 14:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jxmr-j43h-4x9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  19. 2026-10-26 12:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jxmr-j43h-4x9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  20. 2026-10-25 19:42 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-25 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
  22. 2026-10-25 10:29 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-25 10:29 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-25 10:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jxmr-j43h-4x9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  25. 2026-10-24 08:17 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-24 08:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jxmr-j43h-4x9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  2. 2026-10-23 06:05 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-23 06:05 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-10-23 06:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jxmr-j43h-4x9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  5. 2026-10-22 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
  6. 2026-10-22 03:52 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-22 03:52 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-22 03:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jxmr-j43h-4x9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  9. 2026-10-21 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
  10. 2026-10-21 01:41 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-21 01:41 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-10-21 01:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jxmr-j43h-4x9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  13. 2026-10-19 23:29 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-19 23:29 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-19 23:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jxmr-j43h-4x9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  16. 2026-10-18 21:17 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-18 21:17 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-18 21:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jxmr-j43h-4x9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  19. 2026-10-18 10:43 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-17 19:04 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-17 19:04 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-17 19:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jxmr-j43h-4x9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  23. 2026-10-17 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
  24. 2026-10-16 16:52 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-16 16:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jxmr-j43h-4x9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  26. 2026-10-16 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
  27. 2026-10-15 14:40 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-10-15 14:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jxmr-j43h-4x9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  29. 2026-10-14 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
  30. 2026-10-14 12:28 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-10-14 12:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jxmr-j43h-4x9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  32. 2026-10-13 10:15 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-10-13 10:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jxmr-j43h-4x9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  34. 2026-10-12 20:38 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-10-12 08:02 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-10-12 08:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jxmr-j43h-4x9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  37. 2026-10-12 04:21 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-10-12 04:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jxmr-j43h-4x9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  39. 2026-10-12 00:41 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-10-12 00:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jxmr-j43h-4x9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  41. 2026-10-11 21:01 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-10-11 21:01 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-10-11 21:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jxmr-j43h-4x9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  44. 2026-10-11 17:22 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-10-11 17:22 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-10-11 17:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jxmr-j43h-4x9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  47. 2026-10-11 13:40 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-10-11 13:40 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-10-11 13:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jxmr-j43h-4x9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  50. 2026-10-11 13:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jxmr-j43h-4x9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  51. 2026-10-11 09:54 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-10-11 09:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jxmr-j43h-4x9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  53. 2026-10-11 06:13 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-10-11 06:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jxmr-j43h-4x9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  55. 2026-10-11 02:33 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-10-11 02:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jxmr-j43h-4x9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  57. 2026-10-10 22:54 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-10-10 22:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jxmr-j43h-4x9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  59. 2026-10-10 19:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jxmr-j43h-4x9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  60. 2026-10-10 15:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jxmr-j43h-4x9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  61. 2026-10-10 11:55 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-10-10 11:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jxmr-j43h-4x9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  63. 2026-10-10 08:15 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-10-10 08:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jxmr-j43h-4x9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  65. 2026-10-10 04:35 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-10-10 04:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jxmr-j43h-4x9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  67. 2026-10-10 00:53 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-10-10 00:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jxmr-j43h-4x9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  69. 2026-10-09 21:14 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-10-09 21:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jxmr-j43h-4x9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  71. 2026-10-09 17:34 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-10-09 17:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jxmr-j43h-4x9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  73. 2026-10-09 13:55 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-10-09 13:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jxmr-j43h-4x9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  75. 2026-10-09 10:15 UTCVendor advisory

Publicly available exploits

(6 references)

Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (3 Metasploit modules, 3 Exploit-DB entries). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.

  • Metasploitexploit/windows/smb/smb_doublepulsar_rce✓ verified
    Published Feb 3, 2020

    SMB DOUBLEPULSAR Remote Code Execution

    Open source ↗
  • Exploit-DBEDB-47456✓ verified
    Published Oct 2, 2019

    DOUBLEPULSAR - Payload Execution and Neutralization (Metasploit)

    Open source ↗
  • Metasploitexploit/windows/smb/ms17_010_eternalblue✓ verified
    Published May 16, 2017

    MS17-010 EternalBlue SMB Remote Windows Kernel Pool Corruption

    Open source ↗
  • Exploit-DBEDB-41891✓ verified
    Published Apr 17, 2017

    Microsoft Windows - SMB Remote Code Execution Scanner (MS17-010) (Metasploit)

    Open source ↗
  • Metasploitauxiliary/scanner/smb/smb_ms17_010✓ verified
    Published Apr 14, 2017

    MS17-010 SMB RCE Detection

    Open source ↗
  • Exploit-DBEDB-41987
    Published May 10, 2017

    Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 (x64) - 'SrvOs2FeaToNt' SMB Remote Code Execution (MS17-010)

    Open source ↗

Frequently asked(6)

What is CVE-2017-0145?
CVE-2017-0145 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on March 17, 2017. The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2; Windows RT 8.1; and Windows 10 Gold, 1511, and 1607; and Windows Server 2016 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted packets, aka…
When was CVE-2017-0145 made public?
CVE-2017-0145 was made public on March 14, 2017: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, Microsoft Corporation, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on March 17, 2017. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of August 14, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2017-0145 actively exploited?
Yes. CISA added CVE-2017-0145 to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on February 10, 2022, affecting Microsoft SMBv1. KEV listing indicates confirmed exploitation in the wild; this CVE warrants immediate attention. A fix is available. Apply it.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2017-0145?
CVE-2017-0145 has a CVSS v3 base score of 8.8 (NVD). EchelonGraph synthesises NVD + CISA KEV + FIRST EPSS + GHSA into a combined EG score of 9.0 (CRITICAL).
Which products are affected by CVE-2017-0145?
CVE-2017-0145 affects Microsoft SMBv1.
How do I remediate CVE-2017-0145?
A fix for CVE-2017-0145 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2017-0145 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2017-0145

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2017-0145?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.