CVE-2015-5317

CRITICALNVD 7.59.0
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“▲” beside the score: it is higher than NVD's CVSS score.

Score elevated to 9.0 because this CVE is listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2023-05-12), indicating real-world exploitation has been confirmed by US federal agencies. NVD baseline CVSS 7.5 retained for reference. The 9.0 is the floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: this CVE's impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 7.5 HIGH under GitHub Security Advisory CVSS. Confidence: HIGH.

Triggered by: CISA KEV (actively exploited)
Sources: CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 4 sources updated this weekExploited in the wild

Also known asEUVD-2015-5288 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-8pqx-3rxx-f5pm (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.0EG
EchelonGraph verdictPatch nowTreat as an emergency — this is being exploited.
  • 33 internet-facing services (distinct ip:port) on record running an affected version — derived from Shodan data (© Shodan); a patched service can stay counted while its port stays open
  • Actively exploited in the wild (CISA-KEV) — the reason this is sooner than the SSVC decision on this page at low or medium mission impact
CISA-KEV: ExploitedEPSS PROB: 23%CVSS: 7.5Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: 33

A fix is available — apply it.

The Fingerprints pages in Jenkins before 1.638 and LTS before 1.625.2 might allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive job and build name information via a direct request.

Internet exposure · derived from Shodan data

33 internet-facing services (distinct ip:port) on record running a version that maps to CVE-2015-5317, in our KEV-Exposure radar’s Shodan-derived sample.

across 15 countries (United States, China, France, Argentina, Japan)top: jenkins
See the KEV-Exposure radar →Derived from Shodan data. Shodan data is owned by Shodan, which holds its copyright (© Shodan). EchelonGraph claims no ownership of it or copyright in it. Aggregate, host-redacted.

How it counts: every 12 hours, when Shodan query credits allow, the radar runs one Shodan query per tracked product, reads up to 100 ip:port services per query, and keeps a service when its banner version matches a CISA-KEV or high-EPSS CVE; a service is dropped when neither a search nor a Shodan InternetDB port re-check has refreshed it for 21 days. A re-check that finds the port still listed by Shodan InternetDB refreshes the service without re-reading the banner, so a patched service can stay counted while its port stays open. A count is a banner-version inference over a sample, not an exploit test and not an internet-wide census, and the unit is a service, not a machine: a machine answering on two ports counts twice.

CVSS v3
7.5
EG Score
9.0CRITICALhigh confidence
EG Risk
89
EG Risk 89/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity75% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation100% × 40%
Fixed at 100% for a CISA KEV listing: EchelonGraph's rule.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Attend at low or medium mission impact; Act at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it sooner than your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and as soon as possible at high.
EPSS PROB
23%
EPSS %ILE
97th
KEV
⚠ Exploited

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.0 is the CISA KEV floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: its impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 7.5 HIGH.

EG Severity
7.5 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
23% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
CISA KEV and EG-KEV Tier 1 (exploited in the wild)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Attend at medium mission impactAttend at low or medium mission impact; Act at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Attend at low or medium mission impact; Act at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it sooner than your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and as soon as possible at high.

Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV yes (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

CISA required action“Apply updates per vendor instructions.”

Quoted verbatim from CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. CISA directs it at US federal civilian executive branch agencies under Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 26-04, which replaced BOD 22-01 on 10 June 2026; it is not EchelonGraph's advice. CISA's notes: https://www.jenkins.io/security/advisory/2015-11-11/ · https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-5317

Published

November 25, 2015

Last Modified

April 22, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Nov 2, 2026
⚠️ Actively exploited (CISA KEV, CISA Vulnrichment). Patch available. Sources: redhat, cisa.
CISA🔴 Active Exploitation

Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog | CISA

Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog | CISA. Listed in CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.

https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2015-5317
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0070

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2015-5317(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(4)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatrubygem-openshift-origin-node-0:1.38.5.3-1.el6op2016-03-22redhat
redhatorigin-kibana-0:0.5.0-1.el7aos2016-01-26redhat
mavenorg.jenkins-ci.main:jenkins-core @ 1.625.2 (fixes < 1.625.2)—ghsa
mavenorg.jenkins-ci.main:jenkins-core @ 1.638 (fixes >= 1.626, < 1.638)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Maven(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
org.jenkins-ci.main:jenkins-core1.626 ... 1.637 (12 versions)
  • every version up to 1.625.2: fixed in 1.625.2
  • 1.626 up to 1.638: fixed in 1.638
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(1)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 24× in last 7d / 135× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 1,134 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 1,034 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-02 10:06 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-11-02 10:06 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-02 10:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8pqx-3rxx-f5pm · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  4. 2026-11-01 10:59 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-11-01 10:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8pqx-3rxx-f5pm · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  6. 2026-11-01 08:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8pqx-3rxx-f5pm · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  7. 2026-11-01 08:48 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-31 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 23% · 97th percentile
  9. 2026-10-31 11:54 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-31 11:54 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-30 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 23% · 97th percentile
  12. 2026-10-30 12:49 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-30 12:49 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-10-29 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 23% · 97th percentile
  15. 2026-10-29 13:44 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-29 13:44 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-10-28 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 23% · 97th percentile
  18. 2026-10-28 14:37 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-28 14:37 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-27 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 23% · 97th percentile
  21. 2026-10-27 15:30 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-27 15:30 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-26 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 23% · 97th percentile
  24. 2026-10-26 16:24 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-10-25 17:18 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-25 17:18 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-10-25 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 23% · 97th percentile
  3. 2026-10-24 18:13 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-24 18:13 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-10-24 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 23% · 97th percentile
  6. 2026-10-23 19:08 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-23 19:08 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-23 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 23% · 97th percentile
  9. 2026-10-22 20:01 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-22 20:01 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-22 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 23% · 97th percentile
  12. 2026-10-21 20:52 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-21 20:52 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-10-21 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 23% · 97th percentile
  15. 2026-10-20 21:48 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-20 21:48 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-10-20 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 23% · 97th percentile
  18. 2026-10-19 22:42 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-19 22:42 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-19 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 23% · 97th percentile
  21. 2026-10-18 23:37 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-18 23:37 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-18 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 23% · 97th percentile
  24. 2026-10-18 11:01 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-18 00:32 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-10-18 00:32 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-10-17 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 23% · 97th percentile
  28. 2026-10-17 01:25 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-10-17 01:25 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-10-16 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 23% · 97th percentile
  31. 2026-10-16 02:18 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-10-16 02:18 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-10-15 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 23% · 97th percentile
  34. 2026-10-15 03:11 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-10-15 03:11 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-10-14 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 23% · 97th percentile
  37. 2026-10-14 04:06 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-10-14 04:06 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-10-13 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 23% · 97th percentile
  40. 2026-10-13 05:00 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-10-12 20:52 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-10-12 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 23% · 97th percentile
  43. 2026-10-12 05:54 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-10-12 01:48 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-10-11 21:44 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-10-11 21:44 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-10-11 17:38 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-10-11 17:38 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-10-11 13:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 23% · 97th percentile
  50. 2026-10-11 13:30 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-10-11 13:30 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-10-11 09:21 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-10-11 05:17 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-10-11 01:12 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-10-10 21:06 UTCEG score recompute
  56. 2026-10-10 21:06 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-10-10 19:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 23% · 97th percentile
  58. 2026-10-10 16:58 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-10-10 12:53 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-10-10 08:49 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-10-10 04:44 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-10-10 00:38 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-10-09 20:32 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-10-09 20:32 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-10-09 20:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 23% · 97th percentile
  66. 2026-10-09 16:27 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-10-09 12:22 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-10-09 08:16 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-10-09 04:12 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-10-09 00:07 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-10-08 20:02 UTCEG score recompute
  72. 2026-10-08 20:02 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-10-08 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 23% · 97th percentile
  74. 2026-10-08 15:56 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-10-08 11:51 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(6)

What is CVE-2015-5317?
CVE-2015-5317 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on November 25, 2015. The Fingerprints pages in Jenkins before 1.638 and LTS before 1.625.2 might allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive job and build name information via a direct request.
When was CVE-2015-5317 made public?
CVE-2015-5317 was made public on November 18, 2015: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, Red Hat, Inc., gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on November 25, 2015. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of April 22, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2015-5317 actively exploited?
Yes. CISA added CVE-2015-5317 to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on May 12, 2023, affecting Jenkins Jenkins User Interface (UI). KEV listing indicates confirmed exploitation in the wild; this CVE warrants immediate attention. A fix is available. Apply it.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2015-5317?
CVE-2015-5317 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.5 (NVD). EchelonGraph synthesises NVD + CISA KEV + FIRST EPSS + GHSA into a combined EG score of 9.0 (CRITICAL).
Which products are affected by CVE-2015-5317?
CVE-2015-5317 affects Jenkins Jenkins User Interface (UI). The affected packages EchelonGraph has on record, with version ranges, are listed in the Affected Packages section of this page.
How do I remediate CVE-2015-5317?
A fix for CVE-2015-5317 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2015-5317 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2015-5317

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2015-5317?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.