CVE-2015-0192

CRITICALNVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2022-05-14. NVD baseline CVSS 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 4 sources updated this week

Also known asEUVD-2015-0230 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-3q8x-6m7c-5p98 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 4.1%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Unspecified vulnerability in IBM Java 8 before SR1, 7 R1 before SR2 FP11, 7 before SR9, 6 R1 before SR8 FP4, 6 before SR16 FP4, and 5.0 before SR16 FP10 allows remote attackers to gain privileges via unknown vectors related to the Java Virtual Machine.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
61
EG Risk 61/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation4.1% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
4.1%
EPSS %ILE
90th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
4.1% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

July 2, 2015

Last Modified

May 27, 2026

Patch Availability(4)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatjava-1.6.0-ibm-1:1.6.0.16.4-1jpp.1.el6_62015-06-11redhat
redhatjava-1.5.0-ibm-1:1.5.0.16.10-1jpp.1.el6_62015-05-20redhat
redhatjava-1.7.1-ibm-1:1.7.1.3.0-1jpp.2.ael7b_12015-05-20redhat
redhatjava-1.7.0-ibm-1:1.7.0.9.0-1jpp.1.el52015-05-13redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 27× in last 7d / 88× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 99 of 232 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 1 repeat row among the latest 100 is merged into the row it repeats. The 133 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-02 14:07 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-11-02 14:07 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-02 14:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3q8x-6m7c-5p98 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  4. 2026-11-01 12:26 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-11-01 12:26 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-11-01 12:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3q8x-6m7c-5p98 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  7. 2026-10-31 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.1% · 90th percentile
  8. 2026-10-31 10:48 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-31 10:48 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-10-31 10:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3q8x-6m7c-5p98 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  11. 2026-10-30 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.1% · 90th percentile
  12. 2026-10-30 09:09 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-30 09:09 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-10-30 09:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3q8x-6m7c-5p98 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  15. 2026-10-29 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.1% · 90th percentile
  16. 2026-10-29 07:29 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-29 07:29 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-29 07:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3q8x-6m7c-5p98 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  19. 2026-10-28 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.1% · 90th percentile
  20. 2026-10-28 05:50 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-28 05:50 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-28 05:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3q8x-6m7c-5p98 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  23. 2026-10-27 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.1% · 90th percentile
  24. 2026-10-27 04:11 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-27 04:11 UTCVendor advisory
Show 74 more
  1. 2026-10-27 04:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3q8x-6m7c-5p98 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  2. 2026-10-26 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.1% · 90th percentile
  3. 2026-10-25 22:09 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-10-25 22:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3q8x-6m7c-5p98 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  5. 2026-10-25 19:58 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-25 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.1% · 90th percentile
  7. 2026-10-24 20:22 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-24 20:22 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-10-24 20:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3q8x-6m7c-5p98 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  10. 2026-10-24 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.1% · 90th percentile
  11. 2026-10-23 18:43 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-23 18:43 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-23 18:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3q8x-6m7c-5p98 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  14. 2026-10-23 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.1% · 90th percentile
  15. 2026-10-22 16:59 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-22 16:59 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-10-22 16:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3q8x-6m7c-5p98 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  18. 2026-10-22 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.0% · 90th percentile
  19. 2026-10-21 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.0% · 90th percentile
  20. 2026-10-21 15:19 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-21 15:19 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-21 15:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3q8x-6m7c-5p98 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  23. 2026-10-20 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.0% · 90th percentile
  24. 2026-10-20 13:39 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-20 13:39 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-10-20 13:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3q8x-6m7c-5p98 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  27. 2026-10-19 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.0% · 90th percentile
  28. 2026-10-19 11:59 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-10-19 11:59 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-10-19 11:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3q8x-6m7c-5p98 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  31. 2026-10-18 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.0% · 90th percentile
  32. 2026-10-18 10:07 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-10-18 10:07 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-10-18 10:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3q8x-6m7c-5p98 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  35. 2026-10-17 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.0% · 90th percentile
  36. 2026-10-17 08:26 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-10-17 08:26 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-10-17 08:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3q8x-6m7c-5p98 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  39. 2026-10-16 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.0% · 90th percentile
  40. 2026-10-16 06:45 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-10-16 06:45 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-10-16 06:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3q8x-6m7c-5p98 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  43. 2026-10-15 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.0% · 90th percentile
  44. 2026-10-15 05:06 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-10-15 05:06 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-10-15 05:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3q8x-6m7c-5p98 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  47. 2026-10-14 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.0% · 90th percentile
  48. 2026-10-14 00:53 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-10-14 00:53 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-10-14 00:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3q8x-6m7c-5p98 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  51. 2026-10-13 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.0% · 90th percentile
  52. 2026-10-12 20:57 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-10-12 20:57 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-10-12 20:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3q8x-6m7c-5p98 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  55. 2026-10-12 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.0% · 90th percentile
  56. 2026-10-12 01:19 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-10-11 13:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.0% · 90th percentile
  58. 2026-10-10 19:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.0% · 90th percentile
  59. 2026-10-09 20:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.0% · 90th percentile
  60. 2026-10-08 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.0% · 90th percentile
  61. 2026-10-07 23:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.0% · 90th percentile
  62. 2026-10-06 15:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.0% · 90th percentile
  63. 2026-10-05 17:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.0% · 90th percentile
  64. 2026-10-03 14:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.0% · 90th percentile
  65. 2026-10-01 19:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.0% · 90th percentile
  66. 2026-09-30 14:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.0% · 90th percentile
  67. 2026-09-30 09:00 UTCEG score recompute
  68. 2026-09-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.0% · 90th percentile
  69. 2026-09-26 15:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.0% · 90th percentile
  70. 2026-09-20 20:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.0% · 90th percentile
  71. 2026-09-19 15:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.0% · 90th percentile
  72. 2026-09-18 19:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.0% · 90th percentile
  73. 2026-09-17 19:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.0% · 89th percentile
  74. 2026-09-15 03:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.0% · 89th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2015-0192?
CVE-2015-0192 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on July 2, 2015. Unspecified vulnerability in IBM Java 8 before SR1, 7 R1 before SR2 FP11, 7 before SR9, 6 R1 before SR8 FP4, 6 before SR16 FP4, and 5.0 before SR16 FP10 allows remote attackers to gain privileges via unknown vectors related to the Java Virtual Machine.
When was CVE-2015-0192 made public?
CVE-2015-0192 was made public on May 5, 2015: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, IBM Corporation, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on July 2, 2015. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of May 27, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2015-0192 actively exploited?
CVE-2015-0192 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 4.1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (90th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2015-0192?
CVE-2015-0192 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2015-0192?
A fix for CVE-2015-0192 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2015-0192 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2015-0192

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2015-0192?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.