CVE-2014-6271

CRITICALNVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score elevated to 9.8 because this CVE is listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2022-01-28), indicating real-world exploitation has been confirmed by US federal agencies. NVD baseline CVSS 9.8 retained for reference. Confidence: HIGH.

Triggered by: CISA KEV (actively exploited)
Sources: CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 4 sources updated this weekExploited in the wild

Also known asEUVD-2014-6157 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-6hfc-grwp-2p9c (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPatch nowTreat as an emergency — this is being exploited.
  • Actively exploited in the wild (CISA-KEV) — the reason this is sooner than the SSVC decision on this page at low mission impact
CISA-KEV: ExploitedEPSS PROB: >99.9%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: Metasploit · Exploit-DB (verified) · other public PoCExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

GNU Bash through 4.3 processes trailing strings after function definitions in the values of environment variables, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted environment, as demonstrated by vectors involving the ForceCommand feature in OpenSSH sshd, the mod_cgi and mod_cgid modules in the Apache HTTP Server, scripts executed by unspecified DHCP clients, and other situations in which setting the environment occurs across a privilege boundary from Bash execution, aka "ShellShock." NOTE: the original fix for this issue was incorrect; CVE-2014-7169 has been assigned to cover the vulnerability that is still present after the incorrect fix.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALhigh confidence
EG Risk
99
EG Risk 99/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation100% × 40%
Fixed at 100% for a CISA KEV listing: EchelonGraph's rule.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Attend at low mission impact; Act at medium or high.
Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it sooner than your standard update timelines at low mission impact and as soon as possible at medium or high.
EPSS PROB
>99.9%
EPSS %ILE
99th
KEV
⚠ Exploited

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
>99.9% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-02). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
CISA KEV and EG-KEV Tier 1 (exploited in the wild)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Act at medium mission impactAttend at low mission impact; Act at medium or high.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 3 days & forensic triage if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Attend at low mission impact; Act at medium or high.

A fix is available. Apply it sooner than your standard update timelines at low mission impact and as soon as possible at medium or high.

Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 3 days & forensic triage if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV yes (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

CISA required action“Apply updates per vendor instructions.”

Quoted verbatim from CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. CISA directs it at US federal civilian executive branch agencies under Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 26-04, which replaced BOD 22-01 on 10 June 2026; it is not EchelonGraph's advice. CISA's notes: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-6271

Published

September 24, 2014

Last Modified

June 17, 2026

Advisory Details (7)

Auto-updated Oct 29, 2026
⚠️ Actively exploited (CISA KEV, CISA Vulnrichment). Patch available.
Web page

linux.oracle.com | ELSA-2014-1294

http://linux.oracle.com/errata/ELSA-2014-1294.html
Web page

linux.oracle.com | ELSA-2014-1293

http://linux.oracle.com/errata/ELSA-2014-1293.html
Web page

lcamtuf's old blog: Quick notes about the bash bug, its impact, and the fixes so far

http://lcamtuf.blogspot.com/2014/09/quick-notes-about-bash-bug-its-impact.html
Web page

JVN#55667175: QNAP QTS vulnerable to OS command injection

http://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN55667175/index.html
Web page

Mageia Advisory: MGASA-2014-0388 - Updated bash packages fix CVE-2014-6271

http://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2014-0388.html
Web page

メンテナンス中

http://jvndb.jvn.jp/jvndb/JVNDB-2014-000126

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2014-6271(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(5)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntubash-static (4.3-7ubuntu1.1) @ trusty2026-10-31ubuntu
redhatrhev-hypervisor6-0:6.5-20140930.1.el6ev2014-10-02redhat
redhatbash-0:4.1.2-15.el6_5.1.sjis.12014-09-24redhat
redhatbash-0:4.1.2-15.el6_4.12014-09-24redhat
redhatbash-0:4.2.45-5.el7_0.22014-09-24redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(6 across 6 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
bash—
  • every version up to 4.3-9.1: fixed in 4.3-9.1
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
bash—
  • every version up to 4.3-9.1: fixed in 4.3-9.1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
bash—
  • every version up to 4.3-9.1: fixed in 4.3-9.1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
bash—
  • every version up to 4.3-9.1: fixed in 4.3-9.1
—
Debian:6.0(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
bash4.1-3
  • every version up to 4.1-3+deb6u1: fixed in 4.1-3+deb6u1
—
Debian:7(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
bash4.2+dfsg-0.1
  • every version up to 4.2+dfsg-0.1+deb7u1: fixed in 4.2+dfsg-0.1+deb7u1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(4)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 21× in last 7d / 162× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 1,663 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 1,563 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-02 20:09 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-11-02 20:09 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-02 20:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6hfc-grwp-2p9c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  4. 2026-11-02 04:25 UTCOSV refresh
  5. 2026-11-01 18:10 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-11-01 18:10 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-11-01 18:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6hfc-grwp-2p9c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  8. 2026-10-31 16:12 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-31 16:12 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-10-31 16:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6hfc-grwp-2p9c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  11. 2026-10-30 14:09 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-30 14:09 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-30 14:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6hfc-grwp-2p9c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  14. 2026-10-29 12:12 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-29 12:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6hfc-grwp-2p9c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  16. 2026-10-28 10:13 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-28 10:13 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-28 10:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6hfc-grwp-2p9c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  19. 2026-10-27 08:15 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-27 08:15 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-27 08:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6hfc-grwp-2p9c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  22. 2026-10-26 06:17 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-26 06:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6hfc-grwp-2p9c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  24. 2026-10-25 20:00 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-25 04:19 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-25 04:19 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-10-25 04:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6hfc-grwp-2p9c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  3. 2026-10-24 02:21 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-24 02:21 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-10-24 02:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6hfc-grwp-2p9c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  6. 2026-10-23 00:24 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-23 00:24 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-23 00:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6hfc-grwp-2p9c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  9. 2026-10-21 22:24 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-21 22:24 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-21 22:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6hfc-grwp-2p9c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  12. 2026-10-20 20:24 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-20 20:24 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-10-20 20:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6hfc-grwp-2p9c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  15. 2026-10-19 18:26 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-19 18:26 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-10-19 18:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6hfc-grwp-2p9c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  18. 2026-10-18 16:27 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-18 16:27 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-18 16:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6hfc-grwp-2p9c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  21. 2026-10-18 11:09 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-17 15:28 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-17 15:28 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-17 15:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6hfc-grwp-2p9c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  25. 2026-10-16 13:30 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-10-16 13:30 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-10-16 13:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6hfc-grwp-2p9c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  28. 2026-10-15 11:32 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-10-15 11:32 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-10-15 11:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6hfc-grwp-2p9c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  31. 2026-10-14 09:33 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-10-14 09:33 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-10-14 09:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6hfc-grwp-2p9c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  34. 2026-10-13 07:34 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-10-13 07:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6hfc-grwp-2p9c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  36. 2026-10-12 21:15 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-10-12 05:36 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-10-12 05:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6hfc-grwp-2p9c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  39. 2026-10-12 01:23 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-10-12 01:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6hfc-grwp-2p9c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  41. 2026-10-11 21:09 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-10-11 21:09 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-10-11 21:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6hfc-grwp-2p9c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  44. 2026-10-11 16:57 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-10-11 16:57 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-10-11 16:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6hfc-grwp-2p9c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  47. 2026-10-11 12:44 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-10-11 12:44 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-10-11 12:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6hfc-grwp-2p9c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  50. 2026-10-11 08:29 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-10-11 08:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6hfc-grwp-2p9c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  52. 2026-10-11 04:16 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-10-11 04:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6hfc-grwp-2p9c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  54. 2026-10-11 00:02 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-10-11 00:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6hfc-grwp-2p9c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  56. 2026-10-10 19:50 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-10-10 19:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6hfc-grwp-2p9c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  58. 2026-10-10 15:36 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-10-10 15:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6hfc-grwp-2p9c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  60. 2026-10-10 11:23 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-10-10 11:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6hfc-grwp-2p9c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  62. 2026-10-10 07:11 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-10-10 07:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6hfc-grwp-2p9c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  64. 2026-10-10 02:54 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-10-10 02:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6hfc-grwp-2p9c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  66. 2026-10-09 22:41 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-10-09 22:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6hfc-grwp-2p9c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  68. 2026-10-09 18:29 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-10-09 18:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6hfc-grwp-2p9c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  70. 2026-10-09 14:14 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-10-09 14:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6hfc-grwp-2p9c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  72. 2026-10-09 09:59 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-10-09 09:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6hfc-grwp-2p9c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  74. 2026-10-09 05:45 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-10-09 05:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6hfc-grwp-2p9c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8

Publicly available exploits

(43 references, 10 shown)

Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (10 Metasploit modules, 21 Exploit-DB entries, 10 GitHub PoCs), as are 1 Nuclei detection template, 1 GitHub checker repository. A detection template checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code. A GitHub repository named or described as a checker or scanner checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code. Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.

  • Exploit-DBEDB-42938✓ verified
    Published Oct 2, 2017

    Qmail SMTP - Bash Environment Variable Injection (Metasploit)

    Open source ↗
  • Metasploitexploit/unix/smtp/qmail_bash_env_exec✓ verified
    Published Sep 29, 2017

    Qmail SMTP Bash Environment Variable Injection (Shellshock)

    Open source ↗
  • Exploit-DBEDB-40938✓ verified
    Published Dec 18, 2016

    RedStar 3.0 Server - 'Shellshock' 'BEAM' / 'RSSMON' Command Injection

    Open source ↗
  • Exploit-DBEDB-39918✓ verified
    Published Jun 10, 2016

    IPFire - 'Shellshock' Bash Environment Variable Command Injection (Metasploit)

    Open source ↗
  • Metasploitexploit/linux/http/ipfire_bashbug_exec✓ verified
    Published Jun 7, 2016

    IPFire Bash Environment Variable Injection (Shellshock)

    Open source ↗
  • Exploit-DBEDB-38849✓ verified
    Published Dec 2, 2015

    Advantech Switch - 'Shellshock' Bash Environment Variable Command Injection (Metasploit)

    Open source ↗
  • Metasploitexploit/linux/http/advantech_switch_bash_env_exec✓ verified
    Published Dec 1, 2015

    Advantech Switch Bash Environment Variable Code Injection (Shellshock)

    Open source ↗
  • Exploit-DBEDB-35115✓ verified
    Published Oct 29, 2014

    CUPS Filter - Bash Environment Variable Code Injection (Metasploit)

    Open source ↗
  • Metasploitexploit/multi/http/cups_bash_env_exec✓ verified
    Published Oct 28, 2014

    CUPS Filter Bash Environment Variable Code Injection (Shellshock)

    Open source ↗
  • Exploit-DBEDB-34895✓ verified
    Published Oct 6, 2014

    Bash CGI - 'Shellshock' Remote Command Injection (Metasploit)

    Open source ↗

Past incidents using this CVE

(1)

This CVE was central to one or more publicly-documented breaches. Each card links to authoritative reporting at the time of the incident.

  • Shellshock (bash)Sep 2014

    GNU bash environment-variable parsing flaw allowed remote command execution via CGI scripts, SSH, DHCP and Git. Affected millions of Unix systems.

    Source: The Register

Frequently asked(6)

What is CVE-2014-6271?
CVE-2014-6271 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on September 24, 2014. GNU Bash through 4.3 processes trailing strings after function definitions in the values of environment variables, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted environment, as demonstrated by vectors involving the ForceCommand feature in OpenSSH sshd, the mod_cgi and…
When was CVE-2014-6271 made public?
CVE-2014-6271 was made public on September 24, 2014: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, Debian GNU/Linux, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on September 24, 2014. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of June 17, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2014-6271 actively exploited?
Yes. CISA added CVE-2014-6271 to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on January 28, 2022, affecting GNU Bourne-Again Shell (Bash). KEV listing indicates confirmed exploitation in the wild; this CVE warrants immediate attention. A fix is available. Apply it.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2014-6271?
CVE-2014-6271 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
Which products are affected by CVE-2014-6271?
CVE-2014-6271 affects GNU Bourne-Again Shell (Bash). The affected packages EchelonGraph has on record, with version ranges, are listed in the Affected Packages section of this page.
How do I remediate CVE-2014-6271?
A fix for CVE-2014-6271 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2014-6271 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2014-6271

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2014-6271?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.