CVE-2014-0195

NONECVSS 0.09.0▲
EchelonGraph scoreLOW confidence

Score elevated to 9.0 because EPSS predicts 100% probability of exploitation within the next 30 days (top 0.0% of all CVEs). Confidence: see factors.

Triggered by: EPSS exploit prediction ≥85%
Sources: epss
Weaponized
0.0
EchelonGraph verdictPatch this weekExploitation is likely or a public exploit exists.
  • High exploitation likelihood — EPSS 100%
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 100%CVSS: —Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

The dtls1_reassemble_fragment function in d1_both.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h does not properly validate fragment lengths in DTLS ClientHello messages, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (buffer overflow and application crash) via a long non-initial fragment.

CVSS v3
—
EG Score
9.0(low)
EG Risk
—
EPSS
100.0%
KEV
Not listed

Published

June 5, 2014

Last Modified

May 6, 2026

References (252)

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2014-0195(3)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(3)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulibssl1.0.0 (1.0.1-4ubuntu5.14) @ precise2026-05-28ubuntu
redhatopenssl-1:1.0.1e-34.el7_0.32014-06-10redhat
redhatopenssl-0:1.0.1e-16.el6_5.142014-06-05redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(1)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 2× in last 7d / 7× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-22 21:53 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-07-22 05:18 UTCOSV refresh
  3. 2026-07-06 02:20 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-06 02:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-05 00:26 UTCOSV refresh
  6. 2026-06-25 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-06-25 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-06-16 11:44 UTCOSV refresh
  9. 2026-06-15 17:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-06-12 23:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-06-08 14:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-06-07 15:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-05-31 00:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-05-31 00:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-05-29 13:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-05-29 13:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-05-28 18:37 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-05-28 18:37 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-05-28 18:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-05-28 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-05-28 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-05-28 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-05-27 13:38 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 6 more
  1. 2026-05-27 13:38 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-05-26 15:01 UTCOSV refresh
  3. 2026-05-20 22:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-05-20 22:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-05-18 21:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-05-18 21:29 UTCEPSS rescore

Publicly available exploits

(2 references)

Working exploit code is in the public domain (1 Metasploit module) (1 GitHub PoC). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly — public PoCs typically lead to mass-exploitation within 24-72 hours.

  • GitHub PoCricedu/CVE-2014-0195
    First seen Jun 10, 2014

    OpenSSL heap overflow PoC (CVE-2014-0195)

    Open source ↗
  • Metasploitauxiliary/dos/ssl/dtls_fragment_overflow✓ verified
    First seen Jun 5, 2014

    OpenSSL DTLS Fragment Buffer Overflow DoS

    Open source ↗

Related CVEs(same vendor + same CWE)

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2014-0195?
CVE-2014-0195 is a none vulnerability published on June 5, 2014. The dtls1reassemblefragment function in d1_both.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h does not properly validate fragment lengths in DTLS ClientHello messages, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (buffer overflow…
When was CVE-2014-0195 disclosed?
CVE-2014-0195 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on June 5, 2014, with the most recent update on May 6, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2014-0195 actively exploited?
CVE-2014-0195 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 100.0% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
How do I remediate CVE-2014-0195?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2014-0195, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2014-0195

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2014-0195?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.

Start Free Scan →Browse All CVEs