CVE-2012-6075

NONECVSS 0.0Trending — 3 sources updated this week
0.0
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • No confirmed exploitation signals yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 5%CVSS: —Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

Buffer overflow in the e1000_receive function in the e1000 device driver (hw/e1000.c) in QEMU 1.3.0-rc2 and other versions, when the SBP and LPE flags are disabled, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (guest OS crash) and possibly execute arbitrary guest code via a large packet.

CVSS v3
—
EG Score
0.0(none)
EG Risk
0
EG Risk 0/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. It is distinct from the 0–10 EG Score, which measures severity.

EPSS
91.2%
KEV
Not listed

Published

February 13, 2013

Last Modified

April 29, 2026

References (44)

Patch Availability(6)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntuqemu-kvm (1.2.0+noroms-0ubuntu2.12.10.2) @ quantal2026-05-29ubuntu
redhatrhev-hypervisor6-0:6.4-20130306.2.el6_42013-03-13redhat
redhatqemu-kvm-rhev-2:0.12.1.2-2.355.el6_4.22013-03-12redhat
redhatqemu-kvm-2:0.12.1.2-2.355.el6_4.22013-03-07redhat
redhatkvm-0:83-262.el5_9.12013-03-07redhat
redhatxen-0:3.0.3-142.el5_9.22013-03-06redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(7)

Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 15× in last 7d / 38× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-23 01:08 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-07-23 00:12 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-07-22 21:50 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-07-22 14:31 UTCOSV refresh
  5. 2026-07-22 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-22 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-21 15:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-20 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-20 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-19 14:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-19 14:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-19 02:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-19 02:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-18 10:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-16 16:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-15 16:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-15 16:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-15 01:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-13 22:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-13 06:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-11 08:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-09 19:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-08 15:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-06 02:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-06 02:19 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 71 more
  1. 2026-07-05 09:59 UTCOSV refresh
  2. 2026-07-05 02:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-04 06:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-01 15:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-06-30 23:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-06-30 23:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-06-28 04:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-06-28 04:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-06-27 03:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-06-25 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-06-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-06-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-23 21:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-21 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-21 01:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-21 01:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-19 19:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-19 19:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-18 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-18 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-17 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-17 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-16 21:05 UTCOSV refresh
  24. 2026-06-16 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-16 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-15 17:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-14 23:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-13 22:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-12 23:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-11 13:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-10 13:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-07 15:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-05 22:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-05 22:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-05 06:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-05 06:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-02 20:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-02 20:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-01 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-01 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-05-31 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-05-31 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-05-31 00:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-05-31 00:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-05-29 13:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-05-29 13:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-05-29 01:00 UTCEG score recompute
  50. 2026-05-29 01:00 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-05-29 01:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  52. 2026-05-28 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-05-28 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-05-28 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-05-27 13:38 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-05-27 13:38 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-05-26 13:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-05-26 13:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-05-24 16:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-05-22 21:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-05-22 21:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-05-22 21:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-05-21 22:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-05-21 17:06 UTCOSV refresh
  65. 2026-05-20 22:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-05-20 22:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-05-20 11:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-05-20 11:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-05-20 11:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-05-18 21:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-05-18 21:29 UTCEPSS rescore

Related CVEs(same vendor + same CWE)

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2012-6075?
CVE-2012-6075 is a none vulnerability published on February 13, 2013. Buffer overflow in the e1000_receive function in the e1000 device driver (hw/e1000.c) in QEMU 1.3.0-rc2 and other versions, when the SBP and LPE flags are disabled, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (guest OS crash) and possibly execute arbitrary guest code via a large packet.
When was CVE-2012-6075 disclosed?
CVE-2012-6075 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on February 13, 2013, with the most recent update on April 29, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2012-6075 actively exploited?
CVE-2012-6075 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 91.2% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
How do I remediate CVE-2012-6075?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2012-6075, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2012-6075

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2012-6075?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.

Start Free Scan →Browse All CVEs