Apache Tomcat 6.0.0 through 6.0.14, 5.5.0 through 5.5.25, and 4.1.0 through 4.1.36 does not properly handle (1) double quote (") characters or (2) %5C (encoded backslash) sequences in a cookie value, which might cause sensitive information such as session IDs to be leaked to remote attackers and enable session hijacking attacks. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2007-3385.
CVE-2007-5333
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS v2 base score.
This CVE was only ever scored under CVSS v2.0. NVD CVSS v2.0 base 5.0 — NVD rates that MEDIUM (NVD's v2 bands: LOW 0.0–3.9 / MEDIUM 4.0–6.9 / HIGH 7.0–10.0; no CRITICAL band). Vector AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N. CVSS v2 is an older, coarser metric than v3.1/v4.0 (no Scope, no User Interaction, no Attack Requirements), so it is not directly comparable to a v3 or v4 score. NVD has never re-scored this record under v3. EPSS predicts 63% exploitation probability in the next 30 days; it does not lift the v2 base. EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 2 (Weaponized) sets EG Risk's exploitation input, not EPSS. Confidence: LOW.
Also known asEUVD-2022-3654 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-cww4-vj5r-rx57 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- 29 internet-facing services (distinct ip:port) on record running an affected version — derived from Shodan data (© Shodan); a patched service can stay counted while its port stays open
- High exploitation likelihood — EPSS 63%
- Public exploit code is available (Exploit-DB, marked verified by Exploit-DB)
A fix is available — apply it.
29 internet-facing services (distinct ip:port) on record running a version that maps to CVE-2007-5333, in our KEV-Exposure radar’s Shodan-derived sample.
How it counts: every 12 hours, when Shodan query credits allow, the radar runs one Shodan query per tracked product, reads up to 100 ip:port services per query, and keeps a service when its banner version matches a CISA-KEV or high-EPSS CVE; a service is dropped when neither a search nor a Shodan InternetDB port re-check has refreshed it for 21 days. A re-check that finds the port still listed by Shodan InternetDB refreshes the service without re-reading the banner, so a patched service can stay counted while its port stays open. A count is a banner-version inference over a sample, not an exploit test and not an internet-wide census, and the unit is a service, not a machine: a machine answering on two ports counts twice.
- CVSS v2.0 (legacy)
- 5.0MEDIUMNVD never assigned a CVSS v3 rating to this CVE
- EG Score
- 5.0MEDIUMlow confidence
- EG Risk
- 49EG Risk 49/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity50% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 5.0 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation65% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 2 (Weaponized): a constant, not a probability.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.Exploitation public PoC (exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 63%
- EPSS %ILE
- 99th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (5.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.0 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 5.0 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v2.0 · CVSS v2.0AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
- EG Likelihood
- 63% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-31). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation public PoC (exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
February 12, 2008
Last Modified
April 23, 2026
References (55)
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://jvn.jp/jp/JVN%2309470767/index.htmlThird Party Advisory · VDB Entry
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2008//Jun/msg00002.htmlMailing List · Third Party Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2008/Oct/msg00001.htmlMailing List · Third Party Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-02/msg00002.htmlThird Party Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=139344343412337&w=2Mailing List · Third Party Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://secunia.com/advisories/28878 (archived copy: the site no longer serves it)Broken Link
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://secunia.com/advisories/28884 (archived copy: the site no longer serves it)Broken Link
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://secunia.com/advisories/28915 (archived copy: the site no longer serves it)Broken Link
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://secunia.com/advisories/29711 (archived copy: the site no longer serves it)Broken Link
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://secunia.com/advisories/30676 (archived copy: the site no longer serves it)Broken Link
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://secunia.com/advisories/30802 (archived copy: the site no longer serves it)Broken Link
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://secunia.com/advisories/32036 (archived copy: the site no longer serves it)Broken Link
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://secunia.com/advisories/32222 (archived copy: the site no longer serves it)Broken Link
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://secunia.com/advisories/33330 (archived copy: the site no longer serves it)Broken Link
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://secunia.com/advisories/37460 (archived copy: the site no longer serves it)Broken Link
15 of 55 shown · show the other 40
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://secunia.com/advisories/44183 (archived copy: the site no longer serves it)Broken Link
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://secunia.com/advisories/57126 (archived copy: the site no longer serves it)Broken Link
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200804-10.xmlBroken Link
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://securityreason.com/securityalert/3636Broken Link
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://support.apple.com/kb/HT2163Third Party Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://support.apple.com/kb/HT3216Third Party Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://tomcat.apache.org/security-4.htmlVendor Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://tomcat.apache.org/security-5.htmlVendor Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://tomcat.apache.org/security-6.htmlVendor Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg24018932Third Party Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg27012047Third Party Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg27012048Third Party Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1IZ20133Third Party Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1IZ20991Third Party Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2009:018Third Party Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2010:176Third Party Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://www.redhat.com/docs/en-US/JBoss_Enterprise_Application_Platform/4.2.0.cp08/html-single/Release_Notes/index.htmlThird Party Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/487822/100/0/threaded (archived copy: the site no longer serves it)Third Party Advisory · VDB Entry
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/507985/100/0/threaded (archived copy: the site no longer serves it)Third Party Advisory · VDB Entry
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://www.securityfocus.com/bid/27706 (archived copy: the site no longer serves it)Exploit · Patch · Third Party Advisory · VDB Entry
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://www.securityfocus.com/bid/31681 (archived copy: the site no longer serves it)Third Party Advisory · VDB Entry
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://www.vmware.com/security/advisories/VMSA-2008-0010.htmlThird Party Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://www.vmware.com/security/advisories/VMSA-2009-0016.htmlThird Party Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/0488URL Repurposed
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/1856/referencesURL Repurposed
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/1981/referencesURL Repurposed
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/2690URL Repurposed
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/2780URL Repurposed
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/3316URL Repurposed
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532111Issue Tracking · Third Party Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/06cfb634bc7bf37af7d8f760f118018746ad8efbd519c4b789ac9c2e%40%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/29dc6c2b625789e70a9c4756b5a327e6547273ff8bde7e0327af48c5%40%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8dcaf7c3894d66cb717646ea1504ea6e300021c85bb4e677dc16b1aa%40%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/c62b0e3a7bf23342352a5810c640a94b6db69957c5c19db507004d74%40%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r3aacc40356defc3f248aa504b1e48e819dd0471a0a83349080c6bcbf%40%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r584a714f141eff7b1c358d4679288177bd4ca4558e9999d15867d4b5%40%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rb71997f506c6cc8b530dd845c084995a9878098846c7b4eacfae8db3%40%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttps://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A11177Tool Signature
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttps://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-February/msg00315.htmlThird Party Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttps://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-February/msg00460.htmlThird Party Advisory
Vendor Advisories for CVE-2007-5333(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Patch Availability(8)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | xml-commons-0:1.3.02-2jpp_1rh | 2010-08-04 | redhat |
| redhat | tomcat5-0:5.5.23-0jpp_18rh | 2009-11-30 | redhat |
| redhat | tomcat5-0:5.5.23-0jpp_4rh.16 | 2009-11-09 | redhat |
| redhat | tomcat5-0:5.5.23-0jpp.9.6.ep5.el5 | 2009-09-21 | redhat |
| redhat | tomcat5-0:5.5.23-0jpp.7.el5_3.2 | 2009-07-21 | redhat |
| maven | org.apache.tomcat:tomcat @ 6.0.15 (fixes >= 6.0.0, < 6.0.15) | — | ghsa |
| maven | org.apache.tomcat:tomcat @ 5.5.26 (fixes >= 5.5.0, < 5.5.25) | — | ghsa |
| maven | org.apache.tomcat:tomcat @ 4.1.37 (fixes >= 4.1.0, < 4.1.36) | — | ghsa |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Maven(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| org.apache.tomcat:tomcat | — |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Additional Vendor Advisories
(5)
Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 6× in last 7d / 27× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 84 of 104 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 16 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 20 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-11-01 08:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cww4-vj5r-rx57 · GitHub severity MODERATE
- 2026-11-01 08:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-30 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-28 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-27 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-26 11:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-25 20:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-24 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-23 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-21 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-20 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-19 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-18 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-18 11:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-15 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-14 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-13 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-12 21:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 02:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
Show 59 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-07 23:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-30 14:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-29 07:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 19:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-17 19:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-15 03:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-12 14:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-05 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-04 04:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-30 01:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-07 16:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-05 19:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-04 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-30 16:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-30 01:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-28 15:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-26 13:33 UTCEG score recomputeAssessed again: 5.0 MEDIUM
- 2026-07-25 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-24 14:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-23 14:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-23 00:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-23 00:33 UTCEG score recompute▼ 5.30
- 2026-07-22 23:59 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 5.3 MEDIUM
- 2026-07-22 21:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 14:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-21 15:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-20 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-18 09:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-16 16:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-15 16:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-13 06:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-11 08:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-05 02:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-02 14:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-01 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-28 04:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-27 03:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-25 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-23 21:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-22 14:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-21 01:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-18 17:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-17 17:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-16 17:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-15 17:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 63% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-12 23:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 88% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-10 22:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 88% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-10 13:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 88% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-08 14:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 88% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-07 15:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 88% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-05 06:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-04 13:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-02 20:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-01 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
- 2026-05-31 00:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
Publicly available exploits
(1 reference)Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 Exploit-DB entry). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.
- Exploit-DBEDB-31130✓ verifiedPublished Feb 9, 2008
Apache Tomcat 6.0.15 - Cookie Quote Handling Remote Information Disclosure
Open source ↗
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownMaven:org.apache.tomcat:tomcat
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2009:1164 · redhat:RHSA-2010:0602
- CVE-2008-5515CVSS v2 5.0EG 5.3EPSS p97MEDIUM
- CVE-2009-0033EG 5.0EPSS p96MEDIUM
- CVE-2009-0580EG 4.3EPSS p100MEDIUM
- CVE-2009-0783EG 4.2MEDIUM
- CVE-2009-0781EG 4.3EPSS p96MEDIUM
- CVE-2009-2412EG 10.0EPSS p97HIGH
- CVE-2009-1955NVD 7.5EG 8.1EPSS p99HIGH
- CVE-2007-5116EG 7.5EPSS p92HIGH
- CVE-2009-1891EG 7.1EPSS p97HIGH
- CVE-2010-0407EG 6.8MEDIUM
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-200
Frequently asked(4)
What is CVE-2007-5333?
When was CVE-2007-5333 made public?
Is CVE-2007-5333 actively exploited?
How do I remediate CVE-2007-5333?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2007-5333
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2007-5333?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.